CBS News
More than a third of all trees species at risk of extinction, global assessment finds
More than a third of all tree species worldwide face extinction, threatening ecosystems, plants, animals and economies around the world, experts warned Monday.
In all, 38% of trees are at risk, according to the International Union for the Conservation of Nature global assessment. They face threats from climate change, deforestation, invasive species, pests and disease in almost every single country in the world.
Trees account for more than a quarter of the species on the International Union for the Conservation of Nature’s Red List. The number of threatened trees is more than double the number of threatened birds, mammals, reptiles and amphibians.
The loss of trees is a threat to thousands of plants, fungi and animals, according to the organization. Trees are considered a “defining component of many ecosystems” through their role in carbon, water and nutrient cycles, soil formation and climate regulation. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, 100 trees can remove 54 tons of carbon monoxide and 430 pounds of other air pollutants a year.
“Trees directly underpin the survival of so many species – including many found on the IUCN Red List. Thriving, naturally diverse forests are essential in mitigating both climate change and biodiversity loss, and as such solutions for one crisis often have mutually reinforcing benefits for the other,” said Dr. Dave Hole, vice president for global solutions at Conservation International’s Moore Center for Science. “This makes the growing number of threatened tree species included on the Red List all the more troubling. Without biodiverse ecosystems that include healthy and diverse tree populations the world will face an even greater climate threat than the one we are already facing.”
People are also economically dependent on trees. According to IUCN, more than 5,000 of the tree species on the Red List are used for timber in construction. Over 2,000 species are used for medicines, food and fuels.
In 2021, world leaders representing more than 85% of the world’s forests pledged to end deforestation by 2030. Yet last year, 6.37 million hectares (15.7 million acres) of forest were permanently lost around the world, according to The Forest Declaration Assessment 2024.
“We are now one-third of the way through this decade, and collectively, we have barely made a dent in curbing deforestation,” according to the Forest Declaration Assessment.
A 2022 assessment of tree species native to the contiguous U.S. found 11-16% of species are threatened with extinction. The greatest threats are invasive pests and diseases.
More than 1,000 tree experts were involved in the International Union for the Conservation of Nature global assessment, which was largely funded by nonprofit Fondation Franklinia. Foundation Director General Jean-Christophe Vié urged the world to act based on the tree assessment.
“Trees are seen as an easy fix to climate change and trees are planted everywhere; but the way reforestation is done needs to be greatly improved, diversifying species and including threatened ones in tree-planting schemes,” Vié said. “Governments and their forestry departments, companies and all those planting trees could easily do this and get positive impact quickly, tackling both the climate change and biodiversity crises.”
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
After the 2024 election next week on Nov. 5, former President Donald Trump will be met with one of two fates: a return to the Oval Office, or years of criminal court proceedings, and perhaps incarceration, experts say.
Perhaps no candidate in U.S. history has faced such stark personal stakes on Election Day.
Trump’s third campaign for president has played out alongside the four criminal cases against him — two in halting fits and spurts, one toward dismissal and one moving relatively swiftly toward a potential conviction.
Where they go from here could very well depend on whether Trump is elected.
New York “hush money” case
A unanimous jury found Trump guilty in May of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. The seven-week trial focused on a scheme Trump signed off on, while in office as president, in which he and others covered up a payment to an adult film star to prevent her from airing a claim that she and Trump had a sexual encounter years before.
The $130,000 payment was made days before the 2016 presidential election. The consequences are scheduled to be revealed days after the 2024 election.
Trump’s sentencing, initially scheduled for July 11 and then postponed again in September, is set for Nov. 26.
Former New York prosecutor Bennett Gershman said even if Trump wins the election, “I don’t see any reason in law for why the sentencing would be delayed.”
Whether he’s president-elect, or once again a defeated candidate, one thing is relatively certain, said Gershman, who’s a professor at Pace University’s law school. Even if Trump loses the election and is sentenced to time in jail or prison, it could be years before he’s incarcerated.
“It’s going to take time for the appeal to wash out,” said Gershman. And if Trump wins, appeal proceedings or the sentence itself, would likely be delayed until after his presidency.
“He’d be a president with 34 felony convictions, and maybe he’s a felon who’s sentenced to two or three years in jail, and he’s running the nation,” Gershman said. “This is all new stuff, but it’s not out of fantasy land anymore.”
The special counsel cases
2020 election
Trump was indicted in August 2023 in a case brought by special counsel Jack Smith. He was charged with four counts stemming from his conduct after the 2020 election, as he and others sought to turn over the results, which showed Trump had lost to Joe Biden.
The case ground to a halt as Trump brought a claim of presidential immunity to the Supreme Court, which in July ruled former presidents are shielded from prosecution for official acts taken while in the White House.
In August, a federal grand jury returned a superseding indictment that narrowed the allegations against him to comply with the high court’s new framework for presidential immunity.
Handling of sensitive documents
Smith is also overseeing a prosecution in a Florida federal court in which Trump is accused of mishandling sensitive government records after leaving the White House in January 2021. That case was dismissed in July by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who said in a 93-page order that she concluded Smith had been appointed unlawfully.
Smith’s office appealed that decision, arguing Cannon ruled incorrectly. Trump’s team has seized on her decision and argued it provides grounds to similarly dismiss the election case Smith brought.
The arguments from both sides may be for naught if Trump wins the election, according to CBS News legal analyst Rikki Klieman, who said his administration’s Justice Department would likely drop the cases.
“If Donald Trump becomes President of the United States, it would logically follow that his attorney general and the new Department of Justice would dismiss the cases that special counsel Jack Smith brought,” Klieman said.
Trump himself has said if he’s elected, Smith will be out of a job.
“It’s so easy — I would fire him within two seconds,” Trump said during an Oct. 24 radio interview.
Fulton County, Georgia, case on 2020 election
Trump was among 19 people charged in a state case in Georgia in August 2023, accusing the group of a racketeering enterprise that sought to illegally thwart Trump’s election defeat in the state.
Five of the 13 counts against Trump have been dismissed, though Fulton County D.A. Fani Willis has appealed the dismissal of three and is likely to appeal the others.
The case has been on hold since June, when the state’s Court of Appeals agreed to consider whether Willis should be removed from the case for having had a romantic relationship with former special prosecutor Nathan Wade.
If Trump wins, the Fulton County criminal case will go from on hold to “a grinding halt,” said Emory University law professor John Acevedo.
“There is that right that all defendants have to confront witnesses, but you can’t really have the president of the United States sitting in an Atlanta courtroom,” Acevedo said.
One person who shares that view is Trump’s lead attorney in the Georgia case, Steve Sadow. He said during a December 2023 hearing in the case that if Trump won, any trial would need to be delayed until at least 2029.
Sadow cited the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, and argued the state’s prosecution would essentially be outranked by the federal government’s needs while Trump is in the White House.
“I believe that the supremacy clause and his duties as president of the United States [mean] this trial would not take place at all until after his term in office,” Sadow said.
CBS News
Threat actors likely to take advantage of election fraud claims to fuel violence, bulletin warns
Washington — Threat actors are likely to leverage claims of election fraud to drive election-related violence, according to a federal bulletin obtained by CBS News.
“Some individuals are calling for violence as a response to election fraud narratives, primarily targeting election officials and populations that threat actors perceive as threatening the integrity of the 2024 general election,” the bulletin says.
The bulletin, which was published Monday by the Department of Homeland Security, warned that online forums used by domestic violent extremists contain threats of violence against election officials and infrastructure “to prevent perceived fraud or to retaliate against it.” Many of the posts are promoting narratives about election fraud linked to mail-in ballots or electronic voting machines, it said.
“Some individuals motivated by this narrative have stated their intent online to intimidate voters or elections staff through surveillance of election infrastructure or personnel, including by armed individuals,” the bulletin continued. “Some of these online users have encouraged violence against ideological opponents related to the use of mail-in voting while others promoted methods of sabotaging ballot drop boxes. Other individuals are using online forums to call for violence against local election officials in response to allegations of fraud.”
Federal investigators believe there are several factors that could increase threat actors’ perceptions of election fraud, including “a contested or close election, variations in state election laws and regulations impacting the release of results, unforeseen events that delay vote counting, or technological or administrative errors impacting vote counting processes.”
The warning comes as ballot boxes have been set on fire in Portland, Oregon, and Vancouver, Washington, destroying hundreds of ballots. A number of mail-in ballots were also damaged when a U.S. Postal Service mailbox was recently set on fire in Phoenix, Arizona. The incidents are under investigation.
Last week, intelligence and law enforcement agencies said Russian actors had “manufactured and amplified” a video purporting to show someone destroying mail-in ballots in Bucks County, Pennsylvania “as part of Moscow’s broader effort to raise unfounded questions about the integrity of the U.S. election and stoke divisions among Americans.”
A joint intelligence bulletin issued earlier this month by the Department of Homeland Security and FBI warned of the potential for domestic violent extremists “with election-related grievances” to target political candidates and elected officials in the coming weeks. It said domestic extremists “pose a threat of violence to a range of targets directly and indirectly associated with elections through at least the presidential inauguration” on Jan. 20, 2025.
A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said Monday that the U.S. remains in a “heightened” threat environment.
“The Department continues to advise federal, state, and local partners to remain vigilant to potential threats and encourages the public to report any suspicious activity to local authorities,” the spokesperson said.