Connect with us

CBS News

CBS News Harris-Trump poll has closer look inside gender gap as Trump, Harris draw even

Avatar

Published

on


Amid an election-defining gender gap that is now tied for the largest this year, the already close presidential race between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump has become closer still.

But vote differences in the 2024 election between men and women are not just crosstabs on a poll memo. They reflect divergent attitudes about larger social matters, such as gender equality in the U.S. More immediately, they mark differences in how candidates are seen, with more women saying only Harris has the cognitive health to serve and more men thinking Trump would be a “strong leader.” 

vote-gender-gap.png

Here’s one example. Men are more likely to say efforts in the U.S. to promote gender equality have gone too far of late. When they do, they’re voting overwhelmingly for Trump.

Women are more apt to say those efforts haven’t gone far enough. Voters who say this are overwhelmingly for Harris

efforts-by-gender.png

vote-choice-by-efforts.png

And on this candidate assessment: women are a full 10 points more likely than men to say that only Kamala Harris has the mental and cognitive health to serve as president, and Trump does not. 

cognitive-health-by-gender.png

Men are less likely than women to think Harris will be a strong leader. 

harris-leader-by-gender.png

But a sizable majority of men think Trump will be a strong leader. 

trump-leader-by-gender.png

For both men and women who think Harris would be a strong leader, a quarter say it is because she is a woman. For those who think Harris won’t be a strong leader, nearly 1 in 5 say it’s at least partly because she is a woman. 

harris-leader-bc-woman.png

trump-leader-bc-man.png

In all, it nets out to even — and to an even-tighter contest. It’s tied across the composite battleground states collectively, and Harris is down to just a +1 in national vote preference. (Harris had once been at +3 in the battlegrounds in September and it narrowed to +1 two weeks ago. Trump has incrementally erased a 4-point national edge Harris had after their debate.) 

horse-race.png

In individual CBS estimates from the specific battlegrounds, it’s also effectively tied. For context, in recent history, Democrats have needed a larger national polling lead to imply competitive Electoral College chances across the battlegrounds because so many of their national votes have come from larger, safely blue coastal states. But this year, at least so far, we see a different pattern in which the battlegrounds track more closely to the national.

Addressing the concerns of men and women

On balance, voters say women face more discrimination than men do today, and women are especially apt to say so. But men who think men face at least some discrimination (and half of them do) are voting for Trump. Women who think women face discrimination are overwhelming for Harris.

There’s also a gender gap on who thinks they’re getting attention from the campaign.

Most men think Trump is paying the right amount of attention to the concerns of men, but many think Harris is paying too little.

Women, by contrast, say Harris is paying enough attention to women’s concerns, but don’t think Trump is. 

A sizable 4 in 10 women think Trump’s campaign is paying too much attention to men.

among-women-attention.png

among-men-attention.png

But the percentage who say the U.S. is “ready to elect a Black woman as president” has risen, and this majority includes people who are voting for Harris and many who are not.

america-ready.png

Approaches to governance

There’s plenty of talk in this campaign about how the candidates might lead as president, not just about policies. And on that we see differences by age, and some by gender too, but plenty by party.

Asked how best to solve the U.S.’ problems, voters mainly call for cooperation between the parties. Some — often the more ideological partisans — think one party running government would be best.

Trump voters are twice as apt as Harris voters to call for “one strong leader to do what they think best.”

Younger voters — and in particular younger men — are comparably more likely to say the country needs that.

best-solv.png

Trump continues to win the votes of people who think the U.S. political system needs to be completely rebuilt. 

vote-by-poli-sys.png

The economy — and how it still underpins Trump

Some potentially good news for Harris is that people say they’re judging her more on her own economic plans than on the economic record of the Biden administration. 

She’s cut a bit into his edge on who’d make people financially better off. 

finance-better-off.png

But that edge remains nonetheless, and she has stalled in cutting into Trump’s edge with voters who say the economy is a major factor for them. 

vote-by-econ-factor.png

A big majority continue to say they recall the Trump economy as good, so Harris has not gotten voters to reconsider or rethink that memory. 

People are split over whether Trump’s policies helped them financially during the pandemic specifically, and that cuts to vote. 

trump-economy.png

trump-covid-policies.png

A few notes on what’s changed since Harris last month had more of an edge:

Perhaps one of the biggest indicators of why this race remains so close: Harris does well when people rate abortion as a top issue, especially among women who think so. And it is a major issue for half, but she has not succeeded over the course of the campaign in getting many more voters to rate it as a top issue. It’s hovered in the low 50s range for those who call it a major factor.

vote-choice-by-abort-factor.png

major-factors.png

abort-factor-over-time.png


This CBS News/YouGov survey was conducted with a representative sample of 2,161 registered voters nationwide interviewed between October 23-25, 2024. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, and education based on the U.S. Census American Community Survey and the U.S. Census Current Population Survey, as well as past vote. Respondents were selected to be representative of registered voters nationwide. The margin of error for registered voters is ±2.6 points. Battlegrounds are AZ, GA, MI, NC, NV, PA, and WI.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

CBS News

Transcript: “Face the Nation” excerpt of Norah O’Donnell interview with Vice President Kamala Harris

Avatar

Published

on


Harris warns Iran not to respond to Israel’s counterstrike


Harris warns Iran not to respond to Israel’s counterstrike: “It would be a mistake”

00:54

NORAH O’DONNELL: Israel launched an attack on Iran- 

VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS: Yeah.

NORAH O’DONNELL: -that has raised fears of a widening conflict in the Middle East. What is your message to Iran?

VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS: Well, first of all, do not respond. It would be a mistake. And we are prepared to defend Israel, as we have before. We will again. But the critical point is that there must be a de-escalation in the region. And we are working through diplomatic channels and other channels to ensure that there is a de-escalation in the region.

NORAH O’DONNELL: Is there any indication, based on the intelligence that you’ve seen, that Iran wants to respond?

VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS: I can’t speak to that, but we’ve been very clear as the United States that they should not respond and that it would be a mistake.

NORAH O’DONNELL: What are the consequences if they do?

VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS: I’ll keep you posted. 



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

Harris warns Iran not to respond to Israel’s counterstrike: “It would be a mistake”

Avatar

Published

on


Vice President Kamala Harris said Saturday she believes “it would be a mistake” for Tehran to respond to Israel’s counterstrike on Iran.

In an interview with “CBS Evening News” anchor and managing editor Norah O’Donnell conducted on the campaign trail in Kalamazoo, Michigan, Harris said her message to Iran was “do not respond.”

“It would be a mistake,” the Democratic presidential candidate said. “And we are prepared to defend Israel, as we have before. We will again. But the critical point is that there must be a de-escalation in the region. And we are working through diplomatic channels, and other channels, to ensure that there is a de-escalation in the region.”

Early Saturday morning local time, the Israeli military launched a series of what it described as “precise strikes on military targets” in response to Iran’s Oct. 1 missile attack on Israel in which it fired about 200 ballistic missiles.

While explosions were heard in Tehran, according to Iranian state media, Iran’s military appeared to downplay the attack, with a government spokesperson saying the strikes caused only “limited damage.” Iranian state media said four soldiers were killed.

Speaking to reporters in Philadelphia Saturday on his way to a campaign event, Biden said that he received a head’s up from Israel prior to the attacks.

“It looks like they didn’t hit anything other than military targets,” Mr. Biden said. “My hope is this is the end.”

And in a call with reporters, a senior Biden administration official said the U.S. did not participate in the operation, describing Israel’s attack as an “act of self-defense.”

The senior official said that Mr. Biden last week spoke to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and “encouraged” him “to design a response that served to deter further attacks against Israel while reducing risk of further escalation.”

A spokesperson for Netanyahu’s office said in a statement that “Israel chose in advance the targets of the attack in accordance with its national interests, and not according to American dictates.”

When asked about Netanyahu’s relationship with the Biden administration in an interview with “60 Minutes” earlier this month, Harris responded, “I think, with all due respect, the better question is, do we have an important alliance between the American people and the Israeli people.”

The Biden administration in August approved $20 billion in weapons sales to Israel.

Harris declined to say if U.S. intelligence indicated that Iran wants to respond, reiterating that the U.S. stance is that Tehran “should not respond and that would be a mistake.”

And when pushed on whether there would be consequences for such an Iranian response, Harris said, “I’ll keep you posted.”



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

Pennsylvania top election official says that 2020 ligation upheld that “elections were accurate”

Avatar

Published

on


Pennsylvania top election official says that 2020 ligation upheld that “elections were accurate” – CBS News


Watch CBS News



Top elections officials from two of the top battleground states, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennyslvania Al Schmidt and Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, tell “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” that they are confident in their states’ election systems despite false claims of election fraud, they are confident in their systems. In Pennsylvania in particular, Schmidt said the litigation after the 2020 election showed that in “every one of those cases upheld that our elections were accurate and were not susceptible to any sort of widespread voter fraud or anything like that.”

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024 Breaking MN

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.