Connect with us

Star Tribune

Someone stole three blue mail collection boxes off St. Paul streets

Avatar

Published

on


Someone took mail theft to new lows in St. Paul by stealing three blue collection boxes — the entire box — from their public locations by cutting them free from the ground, according to an official with the U.S. Postal Inspection Service.

The boxes were later recovered, but neither the exact spot they were taken from nor where they were found is being disclosed for now as the investigation continues, said Rachel Williams, a spokesperson for the inspection service, the federal agency that protects the mail.

The boxes were taken sometime in early January from an area that Williams said was “not a high-volume” location for mail delivery. The boxes were cut into, said Williams, but it’s unclear if mail was stolen since it’s not known how much mail they contained at the boxes were taken.

The USPS uses a network of nearly 140,000 blue collection boxes nationwide, and the theft of one of the boxes is rare, said Williams. “It’s not a frequent occurrence,” she said.

Crimes against letter carriers have spiked in recent years, however, including armed robberies less than 24 hours apart of carriers in Edina and Brooklyn Center last fall.

Thieves have been targeting mail for a variety of reasons, including ‘check washing’ schemes in which information is stolen from real checks to create fake checks using real bank account numbers. The National Association of Letter Carriers held a press conference last month calling for more protections for members of their group, citing statistics that show some 2,000 violent attacks on letter carriers nationwide since 2020. The USPS stepped up efforts last year to reduce postal crimes in response, using enforcement surges, more secure collection boxes and new, electronic locks to thwart criminals.

Anyone with information on the stolen St. Paul boxes is encouraged to call the National Law Enforcement Communications Center of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service at 1-888-876-5322.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Star Tribune

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey rebuffs calls for police chief’s firing

Avatar

Published

on


Anti-police brutality activists interrupted a Minneapolis City Council meeting Thursday to call for Police Chief Brian O’Hara’s firing, saying his department failed a Black man who begged police for help for months, to no avail, before he was finally shot in the neck by his white neighbor.

John Sawchak, 54, is charged with shooting Davis Moturi, 34, even though three warrants had been issued for his arrest in connection with threats to Moturi and other neighbors.

Activists showed up at the council meeting and asked for time to talk about the case. Instead, the council recessed and activists took the podium and castigated the city for failing Black people, even as state and federal officials are forcing the police department into court-sanctioned monitoring because of past civil rights violations.

Nekima Levy Armstrong, founder of the Racial Justice Network, said O’Hara needs to be held accountable.

“This is not the first time instance where the community has raised concerns about his poor judgment, poor leadership, blaming the community and excuses. It’s completely unacceptable for him to get away with it,” she said. “How many Black people’s doors have they kicked in for less?”

On Thursday the council voted to request the city auditor review the city’s involvement in and response to the matters between Moturi and Sawchak.

Mayor Jacob Frey released a statement in response saying he supports the council’s call for an independent review of the case, but O’Hara “will continue to be the Minneapolis police chief.”

Protesters also questioned why the public hadn’t heard from Community Safety Commissioner Toddrick Barnette, who called a news conference within hours to say he’s not going to fire O’Hara and the city leadership supports him.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Star Tribune

Backyard chickens approved for more areas in Woodbury, but not typical city lot

Avatar

Published

on


A Girl Scout from Troop 58068 told the Woodbury City Council recently that they should allow backyard chickens in the city: They cheer people up, she said.

It turned out that chickens were on an upcoming agenda and, perhaps pushed a bit by the scout’s lobbying, the Woodbury City Council at their next meeting passed a new ordinance allowing for backyard hens.

The new ordinance went into effect on Oct. 23, the night of the council meeting, and will allow people who live on property zoned R-2, a “rural estate” district, to have backyard chickens. A typical city lot is zoned R-4 and those areas still cannot have chickens, the council said.

The city has received requests “here and there” for the last several years about backyard chickens, City Council Member Andrea Date said.

Backyard chickens come have home to roost — and never leave — in a host of other Minnesota cities that allow them, from Hopkins to Thief River Falls. It’s long been allowed in both St. Paul and Minneapolis, and new cities started approving backyard coops during the pandemic, when interest spiked.

In Woodbury, it wasn’t until the question was included on the city’s biannual survey that city staff knew how people felt. The survey found less support for chickens on a typical city lot — just 13% of respondents said they strongly approve of the idea while 43% percent strongly disapproved — but a majority approved of backyard chickens on lots of 1 acre or more.

The city’s rules until recently only allowed chickens on “rural estate” properties of five or more acres.

The new ordinance allows up to six hens, but no roosters, on property less than four acres that meets the zoning requirements. Larger properties can have an additional two chickens per acre above four acres. The ordinance also sets a height limit for chicken coops of 7 feet. No license or permit is required in Woodbury for backyard chickens.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Star Tribune

Anonymous donor pays overdue bill for Fergus Falls home where town’s first Black resident lived

Avatar

Published

on


A $10,000 overdue special assessment bill threatening tax forfeiture of a historic Fergus Falls home was paid off this week thanks to an anonymous donor.

Prince Albert Honeycutt lived at 612 Summit Avenue East, renamed Honeycutt Memorial Drive in 2021. Not only was Honeycutt the town’s first Black resident — settling there in 1872 from Tennessee — he was the state’s first Black professional baseball player, first Black firefighter and first Black mayoral candidate.

He was an early pioneer and prominent businessman who owned a barbershop in town. Missy Hermes, with the Otter Tail County Historical Society, said Honeycutt and his wife were likely the first Black people in Minnesota to testify in a capital murder trial of a man who was convicted and hanged in Fergus Falls.

“In other places, you would never have a Black person testifying against a white person, especially a woman, too, before women could vote even,” Hermes said. “Obviously he was respected enough.”

Nancy Ann and Prince Albert Honeycutt with their children inside the now-historic Honeycutt house in 1914. Photo from the collections of the Otter Tail County Historical Society.

When dozens of people from Kentucky moved to Fergus Falls in April 1898, known as “the first 85,” Honeycutt helped integrate them into the community.

He died in 1924 at age 71 and is buried in Oak Grove Cemetery in Fergus Falls.

Up until 2016, several owners lived in the Honeycutt home. But the city bought and sold the house to nonprofit Flowingbrook Ministry for $1 to take over the tax-exempt property and operate the ministry.

Ministry founder Lynette Higgins-Orr, who previously lived in Fergus Falls, moved to Florida several years ago and little activity has been going on in the historic home since. But she said there are plans to make it into a museum.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024 Breaking MN

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.