Connect with us

CBS News

Behind the scenes with the best actress Oscar nominees ahead of the 2024 Academy Awards ceremony

Avatar

Published

on


Watch scenes from the performances nominated in the category of best actress at the 96th annual Academy Awards, as well as interviews with the Oscar nominees below. The 2024 Oscars will be presented on Sunday, March 10.

best-actress-wide.jpg
Oscar nominees for best actress, from left; Annette Bening, “Nyad”; Lily Gladstone, “Killers of the Flower Moon”; Sandra Hüller, “Anatomy of a Fall”; Carey Mulligan, “Maestro”; and Emma Stone, “Poor Things.” 

Netflix; Apple Original Films/Paramount Pictures; Neon; Searchlight Pictures



Annette Bening, “Nyad”

In 1978 endurance swimmer Diana Nyad failed in her first attempt to swim from Havana, Cuba to Key West, Florida, a distance of 110 miles. She would return more than three decades later, in what would be another five attempts to finish the course, challenged by heavy seas, bad weather, jellyfish and sharks.

Jimmy Chin and Elizabeth Chai Vasarhelyi, directors of the Oscar-winning documentary “Free Solo,” co-directed this inspiring sports drama featuring strong performances from Annette Bening as Nyad and Jodie Foster as her former girlfriend and swimming coach, Bonnie. The two actresses have a comfortable rapport that speaks to their characters’ decades-long friendship, as well as a willingness to confront each other.

In this scene, Nyad springs on her old friend her plan to attempt, at age 60, a Cuba-to-Florida swim. Bonnie is the more reasonable one, but when someone has an unshakable dream, reason doesn’t stand much of a chance:


“Nyad” clip: Annette Bening and Jodie Foster by
CBS Sunday Morning on
YouTube

Bening realized perhaps a little too late the demands of the role: “I was a bit naïve — more than a bit, a lot naïve,” Bening told The Wrap. She ended up training for more than a year, hiring former Olympian Rada Owen. “She immediately made me feel I could do it. I swam for her.”

Jodie Foster attested to the Los Angeles Times Bening’s own endurance during her swimming scenes: “She’s super stoic, never complains. She’s a real San Diego girl. She’d get in the water and then just not get out. After three, four, five hours, it gets cold and her way of warming up was doing more laps, which is crazy, I was continually flagging down [assistant directors] and going, ‘What’s wrong with you? Enough already. Get her out of there.'”

Bening also spent time with the real Diana Nyad. She told The Guardian, “What I’ve come to understand about Diana, what I admire, is not only the fact that she swam 54 hours; it was that she found the ability to think enough of herself to say, ‘I have the right to say I’m going to do this thing.’ I think that is what a lot of us struggle with.”

She wasn’t afraid to make her Diana prickly — a pain in the neck to everyone whose lives were turned upside down in order to facilitate Diana’s obsession. Bening welcomed the opportunity to play someone not entirely likable. “When women have complexity, when women are difficult, our metric for being able to accept them is so different,” she said. “It’s like politicians: there’s always this sense that they have to be likable. There’s a quality that a woman has to have that’s non-threatening and pleasing.”

In an interview with The Associated Press (video below), Bening talked about playing someone with a big ego: “I think that a big ego is a weak ego. People who have a lot of bluster, it’s because of something inherently fragile that’s going on inside. And I think that what’s so interesting about Diana is that she does have a lot of bluster, and she is very obviously charismatic and intelligent and energetic and willing to say, ‘I’m going to do that,’ when everyone else is saying, ‘No, you can’t do that, so just stop.’ But I think with Diana it is true that she has a kind of inner softness, and a vulnerability to her. And it’s because of everything that happened to her (just like all of us, I guess) when she was a kid, that she had to find that thing within her, not only the will and the power to do it, but the desire.

“Because really, I mean how many of us regard ourselves well enough to say, ‘My life is important enough that I’m going to go and do this thing’?”


Full interview: “Nyad” stars Annette Bening and Jodie Foster on ego, cooking and risk-taking by
Associated Press on
YouTube

Bening appreciated the sensation of acting while in the water. She told the L.A. Times, “If I’m swimming, there’s a sort of vibrancy. You can listen. You can receive. It was such a gift to be in the water and have that zero-gravity lusciousness around me. Especially in those scenes where I’m struggling. Your physical body is so absorbed in being in the water. In fact, from now on, every movie I’m in, I want to be in the water while I’m acting.”

“Nyad” is streaming on Netflix.


Lily Gladstone, “Killers of the Flower Moon”

Martin Scorsese’s crime epic tells the story of a murder spree that was little-known for decades until the publication in 2017 of David Grann’s bestseller, “Killers of the Flower Moon.” 

In the late 19th century, tribe members of the Osage Nation were herded onto a region of the Oklahoma Territory, rocky and infertile land deemed to be of little value — until it was discovered to contain some of the largest oil deposits in the United States. By the early 20th century the Osage were the richest people per capita in the world. Such wealth couldn’t fail to attract the attention of wolves in sheep’s clothing.

Lily Gladstone plays Mollie, an Osage woman who catches the eye of Ernest Burkhart (Leonardo DiCaprio), a World War I veteran returning to Oklahoma. Encouraged by his uncle to marry an Osage, Ernest sets his cap for Mollie, for whom he works as a chauffeur. 

In this scene, Mollie discusses her suitor, Ernest, just one of many white men who have sought marriages with the wealthy Osage:


“Killers of the Flower Moon” clip: Lily Gladstone by
CBS Sunday Morning on
YouTube

In this scene, Mollie impresses upon Ernest her desire to submit to the natural forces brewing outside her home. His inclination to rationalize it, to make the rainstorm somehow commercially beneficial, runs counter to her wish to be at peace with Nature:


“Killers of the Flower Moon” clip: Lily Gladstone and Leonardo DiCaprio by
CBS Sunday Morning on
YouTube

In a performance of great stillness, Gladstone portrays a woman whose eyes beseech others to live up to her expectations, or dare them to reveal their inner devil. 

Gladstone, who grew up in Montana on the reservation of the Blackfeet Nation, had previously appeared in Kelly Reichardt’s 2016 anthology film “Certain Women,” as a woman who becomes obsessed with a law instructor (Kristen Stewart). For “Killers of the Flower Moon,” her character is the emotional center of the film — and filling that role, for a Native American actress, was both a tremendous opportunity, and a responsibility that she told “Sunday Morning” was “terrifying.”

“It’s hard being a Native actor having this sort of this much that you can audition for; Marty showed me what’s possible,” she said.

Gladstone said her portrayal of Mollie was deeply influenced by DiCaprio’s performance as Ernest. “He gave me a character that was so easy to believe, so easy to fall in love with, so easy to not see what the sinister side of him was doing,” she told “CBS Mornings.”

Gladstone, who won the Screen Actors Guild and Golden Globe Awards for her performance, is the first Native American to be nominated for an Academy Award for best actress. She learned the news while on a FaceTime call with her family in Osage County. She told “CBS Mornings” she chose to experience the moment there because she felt like the moment belonged to the Osage Nation. “This is their story. So, it felt really special to be able to be there when the announcement came in,” she said.


Lily Gladstone on how “Killers of the Flower Moon” changed her as a person

06:23

“Killers of the Flower Moon” is streaming on Apple TV+, and is available on VOD.     

More on “Killers of the Flower Moon”:


Sandra Hüller, “Anatomy of a Fall”

Justine Triet’s “Anatomy of Fall,” which won top prize at the Cannes Film Festival last year, is an exceptional examination of a marriage, wrapped in the twisting logic of a courtroom drama.

German actress Sandra Hüller (who starred in the 2016 Oscar-nominated “Toni Erdmann”) plays Sandra, a German writer whose French husband, Samuel, has resettled their family in Grenoble, France. We learn that there have been tensions between the two — jealousies, disputes over money, anger over an accident that impaired the vision of their son, Daniel.

So, when Samuel is discovered dead from a fall from the top floor of their chalet, it looks at first to be accidental, or possibly a suicide. But then the police investigate it as a possible homicide — and Sandra is the sole suspect.

In this scene, during the trial in which she stands accused of her husband’s murder, Sandra responds to testimony from the doctor who had been treating her husband’s depression before his death:


“Anatomy of a Fall” clip: Sandra Hüller by
CBS Sunday Morning on
YouTube

In this scene — a flashback to an argument between Sandra and her husband from the day before his death — she accuses him of misrepresenting the sacrifices he has made for the family in lieu of his faltering writing career:


“Anatomy of a Fall” clip: Sandra Hüller by
CBS Sunday Morning on
YouTube

We won’t tell you how the court case is resolved, but the film is powerful precisely because of its ambiguity.

In an interview with Variety, Hüller said she prefers the audience to be left questioning. “I think I wanted to create somebody who would be capable of doing it. I wanted certain people to be a little bit afraid of her,” she said. “Because why do we always have to be sweet, and good victims and all these things? I had a little fun in leaving it in a dark.”

In fact, she explained to W Magazine, she purposely avoided deciding on Sandra’s innocence or guilt for her own sake. “There was a moment in preparation where I had to find out if Sandra killed her husband or not,” Hüller said. “But I realized that this is not really what the film is about. So I let the question go. And I just played the question. … I like when everything stays in the imagination.”

Hüller also stars in the acclaimed drama “The Zone of Interest,” which is nominated for five Oscars, including best picture, best director, and best international film. She plays Hedwig, wife of the commandment of Auschwitz, who goes about her life seemingly undisturbed by the hellish scenes taking place just beyond the wall of her garden, unseen but not unheard.

The success of “Zone” and “Anatomy” are an indication of the increasing internationalization of the motion picture academy. “I appreciate it very much,” Hüller told Vanity Fair. “I also think it’s very modern — that’s the world we live in. We cannot make films just for a specific country, it doesn’t make sense. The things that happen in the world have to do with everybody. That’s what globalization is about. So I think that’s a good thing, and it’s about time that this happens.”

“Anatomy of a Fall” is available via VOD, and will begin streaming on Hulu March 22.


Carey Mulligan, “Maestro”

In “Maestro,” Academy Award-nominee Bradley Cooper (who also co-wrote, produced and directed) plays conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein, who from the age of 25 until his death in 1990 at age 72 was a powerhouse in American concert halls, on the Broadway stage and on television. 

But top billing in Cooper’s film goes to Carey Mulligan, who plays Felicia Montealegre, an actress who married Bernstein, with whom she had three children. The film is both rhapsodic and ice cold in examining their marriage and the affection they share, their love story complicated by the fact that Bernstein also had affairs with men. 

In this scene, in a topiary maze at Tanglewood, Felicia and Leonard take their relationship to the next level:


“Maestro” clip: Carey Mulligan and Bradley Cooper by
CBS Sunday Morning on
YouTube

But while their relationship was stricken with infidelity, they would keep the façade up for the public’s sake, and for the children’s. Felicia also accepted being second to Bernstein’s muse as he wrote timeless shows such as “West Side Story,” conducted orchestras, and taught at Tanglewood. 

In this scene, after she has separated from her husband, Felicia admits to Leonard’s sister, Shirley (Sarah Silverman), that Leonard’s indiscretions were not a surprise: “I’ve always known who he is,” she says. And as to why she stayed with him as long as she did? “It’s my own arrogance… to think I could survive on what he could give.”


“Maestro” clip: Carey Mulligan and Sarah Silverman by
CBS Sunday Morning on
YouTube

In an interview with “CBS Mornings,” Mulligan said of Montealegre, “There was something so iconic about her and so magnetic and wry and deeply intelligent. But also this devotion that she had for him from the moment she met him, I think, it’s just so beautiful. But there’s a real … struggle within her.”

Mulligan said facing up to the challenge of roles like Montealegre and Bernstein is “the fun stuff.”

“I think that’s what we’re looking for,” she said. “If it’s not terrifying, it’s kind of not worth doing. Like, you want to do something that is terrifying and daunting.”

Mulligan, who is also married to a musician (Marcus Mumford), talked with Vanity Fair about a familiar aspect in playing Felicia: “She had this proximity to someone who could command a huge amount of people. I’ve stood at the side of stage at Glastonbury and watched Marcus play to a hundred thousand people — it’s something to see that. … So there was that standing in the wings that I could relate to, and all the feelings that go through your heart and your head when you’re watching the person you love doing that.”

This is Mulligan’s third Academy Award nomination. She was previously nominated for “An Education” and “Promising Young Woman.”

“Maestro” is currently streaming on Netflix.     

More on “Maestro”:


Emma Stone, “Poor Things”

Five years ago Yorgos Lanthimos directed Emma Stone in “The Favourite,” a biting and brutal comedy about politics, ambition, betrayal and lust in the court of 18th century English monarch Queen Anne. Stone earned an Academy Award nomination, along with her co-star Rachel Weisz, while Olivia Colman won an Oscar.

In Lanthimos’ darkly comic new film, “Poor Things,” Stone plays Bella Baxter, a woman who is revived from the dead by a mad scientist (Willem Dafoe). Possessing a new brain, Bella must learn from scratch such things as walking, talking, and having wanton sex. But this “Frankenstein”-like creation is also learning about empowerment, the cruelty of mankind, the boundaries of social behavior, and the vices of men.

This featurette from Searchlight Pictures offers extended glimpses of Bella, a character for whom there were, basically, no guardrails for Stone’s performance:


POOR THINGS | “Who Is Bella Baxter” Featurette | Searchlight Pictures by
SearchlightPictures on
YouTube

Stone is brazenly uninhibited as a child in a woman’s body taking on the world. It’s a wonderfully kinetic showcase for her gifts of bearing wide-eyed wonder to an audience. The audience can’t help but reflect wide-eyed wonder back.

In this scene, Bella excites in the discovery of dance, while a jealous cad, Duncan (Academy Award nominee Mark Ruffalo), tries to match her, beat by beat:


POOR THINGS | “Dancing Scene” Clip | Searchlight Pictures by
SearchlightPictures on
YouTube

Stone told “Sunday Morning” that her character was a challenge to play. Asked if there was ever moment where she thought, I don’t know if I’m gonna get this, Stone replied, “Yes, the entire time.”

Why? “I don’t think there’s been a day on set, of any film of anything I’ve ever done, where I’ve been like, I really got it today. That was exactly what it’s supposed to be! I mean, I think that’s for any creative person. You see something in your head or you feel like it should be a particular way, and then it has to come out of your mouth and your body and all of that. And it never matches up to what exactly you have in your head.”

And she doesn’t discount the role of anxiety in her performance. “I feel so lucky to be anxious,” Stone said. “Because I think it can be sort of like a superpower, sometimes. Anxiety is very activating. It gets you out of bed. You kind of can’t just stay in one place. It sort of forces you to keep moving. I don’t know, I find a lot of positives from it.”


Emma Stone, director Yorgos Lanthimos on “Poor Things”

07:54

Stone won the Golden Globe (musical or comedy) for “Poor Things.” This marks her fifth Academy Award nomination. She previously won for “La La Land.”

“Poor Things” is streaming on Hulu, and is available via VOD.   

More on “Poor Things”:


More on the 2024 Oscars: 



Read the original article

Leave your vote

CBS News

Israel ramps up Gaza City operations as images of Rafah show mass destruction

Avatar

Published

on


Israel ramps up Gaza City operations as images of Rafah show mass destruction – CBS News


Watch CBS News



CBS News foreign correspondent Holly Williams got a rare look inside Rafah, where she joined the Israel Defense Forces trying to eradicate Hamas in the southern Gaza city. This comes as efforts for a potential hostage release and cease-fire deal appear to progress and as Israel ramps up raids in Gaza City.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

What is Project 2025? What to know about the conservative blueprint for a second Trump administration

Avatar

Published

on


Washington — Voters in recent weeks have begun to hear the name “Project 2025” invoked more and more by President Biden and Democrats, as they seek to sound the alarm about what could be in store if former President Donald Trump wins a second term in the White House.

Overseen by the conservative Heritage Foundation, the multi-pronged initiative includes a detailed blueprint for the next Republican president to usher in a sweeping overhaul of the executive branch.

Trump and his campaign have worked to distance themselves from Project 2025, with the former president going so far as to call some of the proposals “abysmal.” But Democrats have continued to tie the transition project to Trump, especially as they find themselves mired in their own controversy over whether Mr. Biden should withdraw from the 2024 presidential contest following his startling debate performance last month.

Here is what to know about Project 2025:

What is Project 2025?

Project 2025 is a proposed presidential transition project that is composed of four pillars: a policy guide for the next presidential administration; a LinkedIn-style database of personnel who could serve in the next administration; training for that pool of candidates dubbed the “Presidential Administration Academy;” and a playbook of actions to be taken within the first 180 days in office.

It is led by two former Trump administration officials: Paul Dans, who was chief of staff at the Office of Personnel Management and serves as director of the project, and Spencer Chretien, former special assistant to Trump and now the project’s associate director.

Project 2025 is spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, but includes an advisory board consisting of more than 100 conservative groups.

Much of the focus on — and criticism of — Project 2025 involves its first pillar, the nearly 900-page policy book that lays out an overhaul of the federal government. Called “Mandate for Leadership 2025: The Conservative Promise,” the book builds on a “Mandate for Leadership” first published in January 1981, which sought to serve as a roadmap for Ronald Reagan’s incoming administration.

The recommendations outlined in the sprawling plan reach every corner of the executive branch, from the Executive Office of the President to the Department of Homeland Security to the little-known Export-Import Bank. 

President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with advisers in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D,C., on June 25, 2019.
President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with advisers in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D,C., on June 25, 2019.

MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images


The Heritage Foundation also created a “Mandate for Leadership” in 2015 ahead of Trump’s first term. Two years into his presidency, it touted that Trump had instituted 64% of its policy recommendations, ranging from leaving the Paris Climate Accords, increasing military spending, and increasing off-shore drilling and developing federal lands. In July 2020, the Heritage Foundation gave its updated version of the book to then-White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows. 

The authors of many chapters are familiar names from the Trump administration, such as Russ Vought, who led the Office of Management and Budget; former acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller; and Roger Severino, who was director of the Office of Civil Rights at the Department of Health and Human Services.

Vought is the policy director for the 2024 Republican National Committee’s platform committee, which released its proposed platform on Monday. 

John McEntee, former director of the White House Presidential Personnel Office under Trump, is a senior advisor to the Heritage Foundation, and said that the group will “integrate a lot of our work” with the Trump campaign when the official transition efforts are announced in the next few months.

Candidates interested in applying for the Heritage Foundation’s “Presidential Personnel Database” are vetted on a number of political stances, such as whether they agree or disagree with statements like “life has a right to legal protection from conception to natural death,” and “the President should be able to advance his/her agenda through the bureaucracy without hindrance from unelected federal officials.”

The contributions from ex-Trump administration officials have led its critics to tie Project 2025 to his reelection campaign, though the former president has attempted to distance himself from the initiative.

What’s in the Project 2025 policy agenda?

Some of the policies in the Project 2025 agenda have been discussed by Republicans for years or pushed by Trump himself: less federal intervention in education and more support for school choice; work requirements for able-bodied, childless adults on food stamps; and a secure border with increased enforcement of immigration laws, mass deportations and construction of a border wall. 

But others have come under scrutiny in part because of the current political landscape. 

Abortion and social issues

In recommendations for the Department of Health and Human Services, the agenda calls for the Food and Drug Administration to reverse its 24-year-old approval of the widely used abortion pill mifepristone. Other proposed actions targeting medication abortion include reinstating more stringent rules for mifepristone’s use, which would permit it to be taken up to seven weeks into a pregnancy, instead of the current 10 weeks, and requiring it to be dispensed in-person instead of through the mail.

The Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal group that is on the Project 2025 advisory board, was involved in a legal challenge to mifepristone’s 2000 approval and more recent actions from the FDA that made it easier to obtain. But the Supreme Court rejected the case brought by a group of anti-abortion rights doctors and medical associations on procedural grounds.

The policy book also recommends the Justice Department enforce the Comstock Act against providers and distributors of abortion pills. That 1873 law prohibits drugs, medicines or instruments used in abortions from being sent through the mail.

US-NEWS-SCOTUS-ABORTION-PILL-NEWSOM-TB
Mifepristone and Misoprostol pills. 

Erin Hooley/Chicago Tribune/Tribune News Service via Getty Images


Now that the Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade, the volume states that the Justice Department “in the next conservative administration should therefore announce its intent to enforce federal law against providers and distributors of such pills.”

The guide recommends the next secretary of Health and Human Services get rid of the Reproductive Healthcare Access Task Force established by the Biden administration before Roe’s reversal and create a “pro-life task force to ensure that all of the department’s divisions seek to use their authority to promote the life and health of women and their unborn children.”

In a section titled “The Family Agenda,” the proposal recommends the Health and Human Services chief “proudly state that men and women are biological realities,” and that “married men and women are the ideal, natural family structure because all children have a right to be raised by the men and women who conceived them.”

Further, a program within the Health and Human Services Department should “maintain a biblically based, social science-reinforced definition of marriage and family.”

During his first four years in office, Trump banned transgender people from serving in the military. Mr. Biden reversed that policy, but the Project 2025 policy book calls for the ban to be reinstated.

Targeting federal agencies, employees and policies

The agenda takes aim at longstanding federal agencies, like the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA. The agency is a component of the Commerce Department and the policy guide calls for it to be downsized. 

NOAA’s six offices, including the National Weather Service and National Marine Fisheries Service, “form a colossal operation that has become one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry and, as such, is harmful to future U.S. prosperity,” the guide states. 

The Department of Homeland Security, established in 2002, should be dismantled and its agencies either combined with others, or moved under the purview of other departments altogether, the policy book states. For example, immigration-related entities from the Departments of Homeland Security, Justice and Health and Human Services should form a standalone, Cabinet-level border and immigration agency staffed by more than 100,000 employees, according to the agenda.

The Department of Homeland Security logo is seen on a law enforcement vehicle in Washington on March 7, 2017.
The Department of Homeland Security logo is seen on a law enforcement vehicle in Washington on March 7, 2017.

Getty Images


If the policy recommendations are implemented, another federal agency that could come under the knife by the next administration, with action from Congress, is the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

The agenda seeks to bring a push by conservatives to target diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, initiatives in higher education to the executive branch by wiping away a slew of DEI-related positions, policies and programs and calling for the elimination of funding for partners that promote DEI practices.

It states that U.S. Agency for International Development staff and grantees that “engage in ideological agitation on behalf of the DEI agenda” should be terminated. At the Treasury Department, the guide says the next administration should “treat the participation in any critical race theory or DEI initiative without objecting on constitutional or moral grounds, as per se grounds for termination of employment.”

The Project 2025 policy book also takes aim at more innocuous functions of government. It calls for the next presidential administration to eliminate or reform the dietary guidelines that have been published by the Department of Agriculture for more than 40 years, which the authors claim have been “infiltrated” by issues like climate change and sustainability.

Immigration

Trump made immigration a cornerstone of his last two presidential runs and has continued to hammer the issue during his 2024 campaign. Project 2025’s agenda not only recommends finishing the wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, but urges the next administration to “take a creative and aggressive approach” to responding to drug cartels at the border. This approach includes using active-duty military personnel and the National Guard to help with arrest operations along the southern border.

A memo from Immigration and Customs Enforcement that prohibits enforcement actions from taking place at “sensitive” places like schools, playgrounds and churches should be rolled back, the policy guide states. 

When the Homeland Security secretary determines there is an “actual or anticipated mass migration of aliens” that presents “urgent circumstances” warranting a federal response, the agenda says the secretary can make rules and regulations, including through their expulsion, for as long as necessary. These rules, the guide states, aren’t subject to the Administration Procedure Act, which governs the agency rule-making process.

What do Trump and his advisers say about Project 2025?

In a post to his social media platform Friday, Trump wrote, “I know nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal. Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them.”

Trump’s pushback to the initiative came after Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts said in a podcast interview that the nation is “in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.”

But even before Roberts’ comments during “The War Room” podcast — typically hosted by conservative commentator Steve Bannon, who reported to federal prison to begin serving a four-month sentence last week — Trump’s top campaign advisers have stressed that Project 2025 has no official ties to his reelection bid.

Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita, senior advisers to the Trump campaign, said in a November statement that 2024 policy announcements will be made by Trump or his campaign team.

“Any personnel lists, policy agendas, or government plans published anywhere are merely suggestions,” they said.

While the efforts by outside organizations are “appreciated,” Wiles and LaCivita said, “none of these groups or individuals speak for President Trump or his campaign.”

In response to Trump’s post last week, Project 2025 reiterated that it was separate from the Trump campaign.

“As we’ve been saying for more than two years now, Project 2025 does not speak for any candidate or campaign. We are a coalition of more than 110 conservative groups advocating policy & personnel recommendations for the next conservative president. But it is ultimately up to that president, who we believe will be President Trump, to decide which recommendations to implement,” a statement on the project’s X account said.

What do Democrats say?

Despite their attempts to keep some distance from Project 2025, Democrats continue to connect Trump with the transition effort. The Biden-Harris campaign frequently posts about the project on X, tying it to a second Trump term.

Mr. Biden himself accused his Republican opponent of lying about his connections to the Project 2025 agenda, saying in a statement that the agenda was written for Trump and “should scare every single American.”

Congressional Democrats have also begun pivoting to Project 2025 when asked in interviews about Mr. Biden’s fitness for a second term following his lackluster showing at the June 27 debate, the first in which he went head-to-head with Trump.

“Trump is all about Project 2025,” Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman told CNN on Monday. “I mean, that’s what we really should be voting on right now. It’s like, do we want the kind of president that is all about Project ’25?”

In a statement reiterating her support for Mr. Biden, Rep. Frederica Wilson of Florida called Project 2025 “MAGA Republicans’ draconian 920-page plan to end U.S. democracy, give handouts to the wealthy and strip Americans of their freedoms.”

What are Republicans saying about Project 2025?

Two GOP senators under consideration to serve as Trump’s running mate sought to put space between the White House hopeful and Project 2025, casting it as merely the product of a think tank that puts forth ideas.

“It’s the work of a think tank, of a center-right think tank, and that’s what think tanks do,” Florida Sen. Marco Rubio told CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday.

He said Trump’s message to voters focuses on “restoring common sense, working-class values, and making our decisions on the basis of that.”

Ohio Sen. J.D. Vance raised a similar sentiment in an interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press,” saying organizations will have good ideas and bad ideas.

“It’s a 900-page document,” he said Sunday. “I guarantee there are things that Trump likes and dislikes about that 900-page document. But he is the person who will determine the agenda of the next administration.”



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

Questions on neurologist’s White House visits spark heated exchange over Biden’s health

Avatar

Published

on


Questions on neurologist’s White House visits spark heated exchange over Biden’s health – CBS News


Watch CBS News



White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre got into a tense back-and-forth with members of the media Monday over questions about a Parkinson’s expert reportedly visiting the White House multiple times over the last year. It was not clear whether the expert was consulting about President Biden’s health or not. The briefing was the third straight briefing dominated by questions on the president’s health following his debate with former President Donald Trump.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024 Breaking MN

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.