CBS News
Another Trump delay effort in “hush money” trial rejected, but judicial panel will take up appeal during trial
A New York appeals court judge on Tuesday denied former President Donald Trump’s motion to pause his upcoming criminal trial, while considering arguments against a gag order.
It was the second time in two days New York’s Appellate Division, First Department declined to push back his trial, slated to begin April 15. An attorney for Trump argued Tuesday that the gag order, which prevents Trump from posting broadsides against the daughter of the judge, is unconstitutional.
Counsel for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg shot back that Trump has a track record of attacking the family members of people involved in cases against him.
The sides faced off in a second hastily scheduled appellate hearing. Trump on Monday sued the judge in his case, Juan Merchan, asking a New York appellate court in sealed filings to dispense with the gag order Merchan issued April 1 and to delay the start of the April 15 trial while Trump seeks a change of venue.
A judge in New York’s Appellate Division, First Department first dealt with the delay request, known as a stay, on Monday.
Associate Justice Lizbeth Gonzalez did not weigh in on either the change of venue or gag order in her brief Monday evening ruling that denied a stay of the upcoming trial. On Tuesday, Associate Justice Cynthia Kern, also said she would not delay the trial, for now.
But even as the trial gets underway, Trump’s efforts to pause it will continue.
Kern indicated in her brief ruling Tuesday that a panel of appellate judges will take up the two issues Trump raised. A briefing to the panel by Trump’s lawyers is due the morning of April 15, just as potential jurors are being shepherded into the courtroom.
Emil Bove, an attorney for Trump, argued against the gag order in the case Tuesday, claiming it prevents Trump fromwas unable to responding to attacks by two main witnesses in the case: former attorney Michael Cohen and adult film star Stormy Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford.
“Mr. Cohen and Ms. Clifford are attacking President Trump in public in a way that is completely different than in any of the other cases,” Bove claimed, saying the gag order violates Trump’s First Amendment rights.
“The First Amendment harms rising from this gag order, right now, are irreparable,” Bove said.
Steven Wu, an attorney for Bragg, replied that Bove was seeking to give Trump cover to hurl “insults” and make “inflammatory remarks about people involved in the case.”
“The slippery slope about this constitutional argument is that he can attack anyone,” Wu said, pointing to Trump’s social media attacks against the family members of judges and prosecutors in several other cases.
In addition to asking for the gag order to be lifted, Trump’s lawyers again asked for the trial to be delayed while the gag order appeal is under consideration by the full panel on the appeals court.
Wu said, “There is no basis for staying a criminal trial” for this reason, and “they have cited no case record” in support of that.
Filings by Trump and Bragg in the matter are not public, but in an online court database, they appear under the headers “change of venue” and “stay.” Documents for an appeal related to a criminal proceeding are initially sealed while they’re reviewed for sensitive information.
Trump has also seethed at the gag order in the case, which put a halt to near-daily social media attacks against Merchan, who he claimed was biased due to his daughter’s work for a Democrat-aligned consulting firm.
Trump has twice sought Merchan’s recusal from the case, an effort that was first rejected in 2023, when Merchan cited a state ethics panel review that concluded he was not ethically compromised.
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
nui/Getty Images
If you’re tired of making monthly credit card payments only to see minimal reductions in your balances then you may be looking into debt relief options. Credit card debt forgiveness is one to consider.
Debt forgiveness companies aim to help you save money and get out of debt faster through negotiations. If those negotiations are successful, your credit card companies may forgive a percentage of your balances, which could provide the relief you’re looking for.
But, like all debt relief options, credit card debt forgiveness isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution. So, what are some signs that credit card debt forgiveness may not work for you? That’s what we will detail below.
Let a debt relief expert help you put your credit card debt behind you now.
4 signs credit card debt forgiveness may not work for you
While credit card debt forgiveness programs are a good fit for some borrowers, they aren’t perfect for everyone. Here are a few signs that credit card debt forgiveness may not work for you:
You always make your payments on time
Credit card debt forgiveness is typically designed for borrowers who can’t consistently make minimum payments. So, if you make your credit card payments on time, every time, that may be a sign that these programs aren’t a good fit for you.
There are a wide range of debt relief options. And, credit card debt forgiveness is a more extreme option that can come with more significant repercussions than others. So, if you can afford to make your monthly payments on time – even if it’s not always comfortable – other debt relief solutions may be a better fit.
Find alternatives to credit card debt settlement here.
You don’t have enough credit card debt
Most credit card debt forgiveness companies require minimum debt amounts to qualify for their services. For example, you’ll need at least $10,000 in credit card debt to qualify for the services Accredited Debt Relief provides and Freedom Debt Relief and National Debt Relief both impose $7,500 minimums. If you have under $7,500 in credit card debt, you may be hard-pressed to find a service provider to work with.
You already have a judgment
If you forego payments to your credit card companies for too long, they may sue you for the money you owe. And, if your credit card companies sell your debt to a debt collector, that collector may take you to court, too.
If you lose the case, your credit card companies, or the debt collectors they’ve sold your debt to, may win judgments against you. Those judgments can give them leverage, making them less likely to negotiate what you owe. While you may be able to settle a debt following a judgment against you, doing so may be more difficult. So, if you already have one or more judgments against you and can’t afford to pay the debt back, bankruptcy may be a better option.
You’re considering a large purchase
Credit card debt forgiveness may not be your best debt relief option if you want to make a large purchase, like a home or car. That’s because these solutions can harm your credit score, making it difficult to access new loans.
“Asking for payment relief or debt forgiveness should be given serious consideration prior to taking action,” explains Michael Broughton, founder and CEO of the credit-building app, ALTRO. “Once you request a change to terms or a lower payment, your credit could be impacted and the chances that you will be able to get loans for other, unrelated items can be severely diminished.”
The bottom line
Credit card debt forgiveness is a fitting solution for many people – especially if they can’t afford their minimum payments. But, it’s not the best fit for everyone. You may want to consider other options if you always make your payments on time, don’t have enough credit card debt, already have judgments against you or you’re in the market for a large purchase. Chat with an expert about your debt relief options now.
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
