Connect with us

CBS News

Actor Ashley Judd discusses overturned Weinstein conviction: “Sexual violence is such a thief”

Avatar

Published

on


New York’s highest court overturned disgraced Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein’s 2020 conviction for sexual assault on Thursday.

The court of appeals ruled four-to-three that alleged victims who weren’t involved in the charges against Weinstein, now 72, should not have been allowed to testify.

Ashley Judd was the first actor to come forward with allegations of sexual harassment against the former movie mogul. She said she was planning her summer vacation to Yellowstone National Park when she heard the conviction was overturned.

“What I want to note is male sexual violence is such a thief,” Judd said in a live interview with “CBS Mornings.” “First, they rape us and then they steal our time. Because I was having a great morning and now I have to invest in talking about how not only is Harvey Weinstein still guilty, but we have institutional betrayal, which is a real thing.”

Weinstein maintains his innocence. He was found guilty of third-degree rape in the 2020 New York case for sexually assaulting an actress in 2013. A jury also found him guilty of committing a criminal sex act that involved a former production assistant in 2006. 

Weinstein was sentenced to 23 years in prison.

“We knew Harvey Weinstein did not get a fair trial. There are some people who are unpopular in society, but we still have to apply the law fairly,” his attorney said Thursday.

New York Times investigative reporter Jodi Kantor, whose reporting with Megan Twohey on Weinstein helped launch the “Me Too” movement, joined Judd on “CBS Mornings” on Friday and said the case was fragile from the start.

“So think of it this way, if you took all of the women who have terrible stories about Harvey Weinstein, they could fill a courtroom of their own, women like Ashley,” Kantor said. “However most of those women, like Ashley, were not eligible to stand at the center of a New York criminal trial.”

She explained that it was due to the location and time of the alleged crimes.

“The acts didn’t take place here in New York. They took place too long ago. A lot of it was sexual harassment as you experienced and not the kind of criminal violent acts that can land you in jail,” Kantor said.

That left prosecutors with two women at the center of Weinstein’s New York trial.

“So to bolster their case, prosecutors brought in additional witnesses, women who had experienced terrible things at the hands of Weinstein,” Kantor explained. “But it was controversial legally because the classic rule of criminal court of course is that the evidence should only pertain to the acts that are under scrutiny in court.”

Kantor told “CBS Mornings” that when Weinstein was convicted, it was important for the “Me Too” movement because “he was convicted with a chorus of women’s voices.” However, that also became the center of his appeal, she said.

Manhattan prosecutors said they plan to retry the case.

“We will do everything in our power to retry this case, and remain steadfast in our commitment to survivors of sexual assault,” a spokesperson for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who was not in office at the time of Weinstein’s 2020 case, said following the announcement of the appeals court decision.

For Judd, she knows that could be painful for survivors.

“Courtrooms are not healing spaces,” she said. “They are traumatizing spaces and victims should not have to perform their trauma in order to find peace. You know what will give us satisfaction and peace is when men stop raping women. Period.”

Weinstein will continue serving a 16-year sentence after a conviction in a separate California case, where there is an anticipated appeal being filed next month that could use similar arguments to the overturned conviction in New York. 

“The California rules on allowing those kinds of witnesses are a little clearer so that case may hold up,” Kantor said. “I should tell you the attorney that Weinstein is using is the same one who was able to get Bill Cosby’s conviction thrown out.”

In a statement regarding the New York court ruling, the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office said:

“Unlike New York law, California law (Evidence Code section 1108) permits the admissibility of propensity evidence in sexual assault cases subject to the judge’s discretion,” the office said. “Consistent with this law, our office sought the admission of propensity evidence of Mr. Weinstein’s sexual assaults in other jurisdictions.”

Judd said “Me Too” is a movement, not a moment. She’s committed to helping survivors.

“So I think we have to look at the whole pattern and then we have to look at our institutions and strive toward institutional courage,” Judd said of where her focus is now.

“The bad news is there are many survivors of male sexual violence and the good news is there are a lot of us. We can support each other. We can nurture each other and when we tell our stories we’re exercising leadership,” she said. “We’re encouraging others to join us in collective action for a moral purpose.”



Read the original article

Leave your vote

CBS News

Luigi Mangione indictment announced for UnitedHealthcare CEO murder caae

Avatar

Published

on


Luigi Mangione indictment announced for UnitedHealthcare CEO murder caae – CBS News


Watch CBS News



Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced an indictment against Luigi Margione that includes one count of murder in the first degree, in furtherance of terrorism, and two other murder counts. CBS News’ Anna Schecter reports.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

Trump lawyers allege juror misconduct in New York criminal case

Avatar

Published

on


President-elect Donald Trump fired another salvo in his long-running effort to have his New York criminal conviction tossed, with his attorneys alleging earlier this month that there was juror misconduct during his trial.

In a previously undisclosed Dec. 3 letter to Justice Juan Merchan that was made public Tuesday, Todd Blanche and Emil Bove wrote that there was “grave juror misconduct” in the proceedings in a Manhattan courtroom earlier this year. 

However, heavy redactions in the letter and subsequent exchanges with prosecutors obscured almost all information about the accusations themselves.

“The jury in this case was not anywhere near fair and impartial,” they wrote.

Merchan on Tuesday directed Trump to make the redacted letter public, and instructed prosecutors to publish their own redacted responses. The judge also criticized Trump’s lawyers for making such serious allegations without sworn statements.

Prosecutors called the allegations “vague accusations of juror misconduct” in one of their responses. They claimed Trump’s attorneys did not want to have the allegations subject to investigation or a public hearing.

“Notwithstanding the import of their allegations, counsel do not request and in fact oppose a hearing at which their allegations could be fully examined, referring to such a hearing as ‘invasive fact-finding,'” wrote a prosecutor for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

Still, they argued such an investigation wasn’t yet appropriate. 

“Counsel’s allegations fall far short of the standard required to request such a hearing in any event,” they wrote.

It is unclear if the allegations relate to a June 7 letter from Merchan that alerted prosecutors and Trump’s attorneys to a comment left on the court’s Facebook page the night before Trump’s conviction.

“My cousin is a juror and says Trump is getting convicted,” the user wrote. “Thank you folks for all your hard work!!!!”

The person who made the comment had previously described themselves as a “professional s**tposter.”

Trump was found guilty in May of 34 counts of falsifying business records, connected with a scheme to cover up a “hush money” payment to an adult film star. He pleaded not guilty and is contesting the conviction on multiple fronts.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

Japan’s Honda and Nissan to begin merger talks, report says

Avatar

Published

on


Japanese automakers Honda Motor and Nissan Motor are reportedly entering merger talks to help them compete against Tesla and other electric vehicle makers, according to the Nikkei financial newspaper.

The two firms are considering operating under a single holding company, and are expected to sign a memorandum of understanding for the new entity, according to the Tokyo-based Nikkei.

The paper also reports that Honda and Nissan are considering bringing in Mitsubishi Motors, of which Nissan is the top shareholder, under the holding company to create one of the world’s largest auto groups.

In a statement to CBS MoneyWatch, Nissan said it has not announced the details in the report, but that the two companies “are exploring various possibilities for future collaboration, leveraging each other’s strengths,” which it announced in March. 

Honda did not immediately respond to CBS MoneyWatch’s request for comment.

In March, Japan’s number two and three automakers, after rival Toyota, deepened ties when they agreed to explore a strategic partnership on electric vehicles.

Analysts characterized the move as one that is aimed at helping the automakers catch up with Chinese competitors, including BYD, which have captured more market share, while Japanese firms have lost ground by focusing more on hybrid vehicles.

China overtook Japan as the world’s biggest vehicle exporter in 2023, aided in part by its dominance in the electric car space.

Honda announced plans in May to double its investment in electric vehicles to $65 billion by 2030, as part of a target set three years ago of achieving 100% EV sales by 2040.

Similarly, Nissan in March announced that 16 of the 30 new models it plans to launch over the next three years would be “electrified.”

Climate concerns drive demand

The world’s auto giants are increasingly prioritizing electric and hybrid vehicles, with demand growing for less polluting models as concern about climate change grows.

At the same time, however, consumer demand for EVs has slowed amid high prices, range anxiety and developing infrastructure around charging points. 

Hybrids that combine battery power and internal combustion engines have remained popular in Japan, accounting for 40% of sales in 2022.

But Japanese firms’ focus on hybrids has left them in the slow lane in meeting the growing appetite for purely electric vehicles. Just 1.7% of cars sold in Japan in 2022 were electric, compared to 15% in western Europe and 5.3% in the United States.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024 Breaking MN

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.