CBS News
Is a debt consolidation program a good idea?
Getty Images
Today’s high-rate environment has made it pretty tough for people to juggle their daily living expenses and their revolving debt. After all, when interest rates are high overall, variable-rate debt, like credit card debt, tends to cost a lot more than it otherwise would. And, with the average credit card rate currently closing in on 22%, and persistent inflation pushing prices higher on housing, gas and food, it’s easy to see why many people’s paychecks are being stretched thin.
These types of debts could get a bit easier to manage if interest rates decline in the future, but it’s unclear if and when that will happen. While many experts expected the Federal Reserve to start slashing rates mid-year, the sticky inflation issues that have surfaced over the last couple of months have pushed out those rate-cut predictions. So, it appears credit card rates are likely to stay high, at least for the near term.
If you’re currently struggling with credit card debt, future Fed rate cuts aren’t the only solution to the issue. Enrolling in a debt consolidation program can also help you get a lower interest rate on your existing debts, making it easier to pay off what you owe. But is enrolling in one of these programs actually a good idea?
Find out how the right debt relief solution could help you pay off what you owe.
Is a debt consolidation program a good idea?
A debt consolidation program is a type of debt relief service offered by debt relief companies — and these programs work similarly to taking out a debt consolidation loan on your own.
When you enroll in a debt consolidation program, your existing unsecured debts are consolidated into one loan, which typically comes with a lower interest rate than your credit cards. The loan is then repaid by making monthly payments to the debt relief company rather than making individual payments to each credit card servicer.
In general, a debt consolidation program can be a useful tool in a lot of scenarios, and it can result in significant interest savings over time. That said, this type of debt relief option may not be the best route to consider in all situations. Here’s when a debt consolidation program may (or may not) make sense.
When a debt consolidation program makes sense
For the right candidate, one of these programs can provide much-needed breathing room and a structured path out from under the burden of unsecured debt. In general, a debt consolidation program is ideal for those who:
- Owe $10,000 or more across unsecured debts with high interest rates over 15%
- Have a steady source of income to commit to a repayment plan
- Don’t qualify for low interest rates on traditional debt consolidation loans or balance transfer credit cards due to less-than-excellent credit
And, a debt consolidation program can make sense if:
You need more affordable payments
If you need more affordable monthly payments, a debt consolidation plan can make sense. With a debt consolidation plan, you typically get a lower interest rate on your loan compared to the individual rates on your credit cards. This makes your monthly payments more affordable and more of the money is allocated toward paying off the principal balances.
You prefer a single monthly payment
Rather than juggling payment due dates across different credit card issuers, each credit card debt gets packaged into one simplified monthly payment toward the consolidation loan. This helps to eliminate the risk of missed payments and the accompanying penalties and fees.
You want a fixed interest rate
The interest rate on a debt consolidation loan through a debt consolidation program typically remains fixed for the entire repayment period, providing consistency in terms of your monthly payments.
Learn more about the best debt relief options available to you now.
When a debt consolidation program doesn’t make sense
While the benefits of a debt consolidation loan are undeniable for the right candidates, these programs aren’t right for every borrower. A debt consolidation program may not make sense for:
- Borrowers who have reasonable unsecured debt balances that could realistically be repaid debt-free within two years or less through budgeting
- Those who qualify for low APR balance transfers or personal loans
And, debt consolidation programs may not make sense if:
You want to avoid extra fees
Most debt relief companies charge fees for their programs, and in many cases, these fees can be a portion of your total debt load. Those fees, in turn, can potentially negate some of the interest savings you receive from the lower interest rate tied to your debt consolidation loan.
Your credit score isn’t high
You’ll typically need a higher credit score to enroll in a debt consolidation program than you would for another type of debt relief, like debt management or debt settlement. So, if your credit score is damaged, you may not qualify for this type of program.
You want to pay off secured debt
Debt consolidation programs have no flexibility whatsoever for including secured debts like mortgages or auto loans. They are only an option for paying off your unsecured debts.
Debt consolidation program alternatives to consider
Before enrolling in a debt consolidation program, it could be wise to explore some other options, including:
- Debt management plans: A debt management plan can help you negotiate reduced interest rates on your credit cards without any upfront fees.
- Balance transfer cards: Those with good credit may qualify for a 0% APR balance transfer credit card promotion to consolidate debt interest-free for 12-18 months while aggressively repaying balances.
- Personal loans or home equity borrowing: Qualified borrowers could explore personal loans or home equity loans and home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) from banks and credit unions as lower-fee options for consolidating debt.
- Debt settlement: Those with low credit scores, little or no income or those who have already entered default status may want to consider debt settlement, or debt forgiveness, instead, as negotiating lump-sum debt settlements makes more sense than consolidation in these situations.
- Bankruptcy: When debts exceed your assets and income, bankruptcy is the option of last resort to discharge eligible unsecured debts entirely and get a financial fresh start.
The bottom line
Debt consolidation programs provide one viable solution for debt relief — but the best path forward depends heavily on your full financial picture. Before deciding on a route to take, be sure to carefully assess your debt amount and the types of debt you have, along with your income, assets and credit. Weighing these and other factors can help you determine the best path forward.
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed a bill Saturday that would have required new cars to beep at drivers if they exceed the speed limit in an effort to reduce traffic deaths.
California would have become the first to require such systems for all new cars, trucks and buses sold in the state starting in 2030. The bill would have mandated that vehicles beep at drivers when they exceed the speed limit by at least 10 mph.
The European Union has passed similar legislation to encourage drivers to slow down. California’s proposal would have provided exceptions for emergency vehicles, motorcycles and motorized scooters.
In explaining his veto, Newsom said federal law already dictates vehicle safety standards and adding California-specific requirements would create a patchwork of regulations.
The National Highway Traffic Safety “is also actively evaluating intelligent speed assistance systems, and imposing state-level mandates at this time risks disrupting these ongoing federal assessments,” the Democratic governor said.
Opponents, including automotive groups and the state Chamber of Commerce, said such regulations should be decided by the federal government, which earlier this year established new requirements for automatic emergency braking to curb traffic deaths. Republican lawmakers also said the proposal could make cars more expensive and distract drivers.
The legislation would have likely impacted all new car sales in the U.S., since the California market is so large that car manufacturers would likely just make all of their vehicles comply.
California often throws that weight around to influence national and even international policy. The state has set its own emission standards for cars for decades, rules that more than a dozen other states have also adopted. And when California announced it would eventually ban the sale of new gas-powered cars, major automakers soon followed with their own announcement to phase out fossil-fuel vehicles.
Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener, who sponsored the bill, called the veto disappointing and a setback for street safety.
“California should have led on this crisis as Wisconsin did in passing the first seatbelt mandate in 1961,” Wiener said in a statement. “Instead, this veto resigns Californians to a completely unnecessary risk of fatality.”
The speeding alert technology, known as intelligent speed assistance, uses GPS to compare a vehicle’s pace with a dataset of posted limits. If the car is at least 10 mph over, the system emits a single, brief, visual and audio alert.
The proposal would have required the state to maintain a list of posted speed limits, and it’s likely that those would not include local roads or recent changes in speed limits, resulting in conflicts.
The technology has been used in the U.S. and Europe for years. Starting in July, the European Union will require all new cars to have the technology, although drivers would be able to turn it off. At least 18 manufacturers including Ford, BMW, Mercedes-Benz and Nissan, have already offered some form of speed limiters on some models sold in America, according to the National Transportation Safety Board.
The National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration estimates that 10% of all car crashes reported to police in 2021 were related to speeding. This was especially a problem in California, where 35% of traffic fatalities were speeding-related — the second highest in the country, according to a legislative analysis of the proposal.
Last year the NTSB recommended federal regulators require all new cars to alert drivers when they speed. Their recommendation came after a crash in January 2022, when a man with a history of speeding violations ran a red light at more than 100 mph and struck a minivan, killing himself and eight other people.
