Washington — The Senate is set to vote Tuesday on legislation to protect access to IVF as Democrats look to draw attention to Republicans’ positions on the issue following former President Donald Trump’s statements supporting the fertility treatments.

The package, called the Right to IVF Act, centers on a right to receive and provide IVF services, while working to make the treatments more affordable. The legislation was blocked by Senate Republicans just three months ago.

Now, Democrats are daring the GOP to reconsider their votes, with fewer than 50 days until Election Day.

“If Donald Trump and Republicans want to protect people’s right to access IVF, they can vote yes on it,” Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois, who sponsored the legislation, said in an interview with CBS News. “He’s shown that it only takes one sentence from him, and the Republican Party will fall in line behind him.”

The issue was thrust into the national spotlight early this year, when the Alabama Supreme Court deemed that embryos are children under state law, which prompted providers to temporarily halt fertility treatments in the state. Since then, amid concern about access to IVF in Alabama and beyond, many Republicans have expressed their support for the popular fertility treatments, including Trump in last week’s presidential debate. 

Democrats have sought to tie IVF to reproductive rights more broadly, arguing that the 2022 decision overturning Roe v. Wade opened the door to restrictions on other procedures.

“From the moment the MAGA Supreme Court reversed Roe as Donald Trump promised they would, Democrats warned that the hard-right would not stop there in eliminating reproductive freedoms,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a letter to colleagues on Sunday, adding that “IVF has become one of the hard-right’s next targets.”

The New York Democrat said the upper chamber would vote again on the package due to Trump’s recent pledges of support for the issue, including backing a mandate that would require insurance companies to cover IVF services, which is also a provision in the Democratic-led legislation. All but two Senate Republicans voted against the bill in June.

“So, we are going to give our Republican colleagues another chance to show the American people where they stand,” Schumer wrote. 

Senate Republicans have repeatedly expressed support for IVF, while claiming that the  Democratic package goes too far. And when two GOP senators unveiled their own package to protect access to the procedure in May, Democrats quickly rejected it, questioning its scope and its enforcement mechanism, which makes continued access to IVF a condition for states to receive federal funding for Medicaid.

The two sides have yet to identify a bipartisan path forward on the issue as they head toward what will likely be another failed vote on the IVF legislation Tuesday. 

Trump has been under pressure from multiple sides in recent months over reproductive rights. While he’s often touted his appointment of three of the Supreme Court justices who voted to overturn Roe v. Wade, he’s also said he believes that abortion should now be left up to the states. And his recent statements in support of expanding access to IVF, while claiming to be a “leader on fertilization,” have earned him rebukes from conservatives who oppose the practice.

It’s been a long and bumpy road to the Federal Reserve’s first interest rate cut in more than four years — a moment that could prove decisive to the finances of millions of Americans. 

On Wednesday, the Fed is expected to reduce its benchmark rate, which currently stands at its highest point in 23 years, after the central bank introduced a flurry of rate hikes to tame the pandemic’s high inflation. While economists are unanimous in expecting a rate cut on September 18, they’re split between predicting a 0.25 percentage point cut versus a 0.5 percentage point reduction, according to financial data firm FactSet.

Whatever the size of the cut, the Fed’s first rate reduction since March 2020 will provide some welcome relief for consumers who are in the market for a home or auto purchase, as well as for those carrying pricey credit card debt. The decision is also expected to kick off a series of rate reductions later this year and into 2025, which could have lasting implications on mortgage and auto loan rates, but could also have a downside of shaving the relatively high returns recently enjoyed by savers.

“It’s been a long marathon — the Fed feels it’s time to lower interest rates again,” Sara Rathner, co-host of the Smart Money podcast and a personal finance expert for NerdWallet, told CBS MoneyWatch. “Consumers are definitely feeling the pinch. It’s been this one-two punch of higher interest rates and inflation.”

Wednesday’s rate cut will “present an opportunity for consumers to take a look at their finances and save money on some of their borrowing,” she said.

When is the Fed’s September 2024 meeting?

The Fed’s September 2024 meeting will be held from September 17-18, with the central bank scheduled to announce its rate decision at 2 p.m. Eastern time on September 18. 

That will be followed by a press conference with Fed Chair Jerome Powell at 2:30 p.m. E.T., where Powell will discuss the central bank’s economic outlook. 

Powell has recently signaled the central bank is ready to reduce its benchmark rate, noting at an August speech that “the time has come” for the Fed to adjust its monetary policy after inflation dropped below 3% on an annual basis and amid  some signs of weakness in the labor market.

What size of rate cut is expected?

That’s the big debate among economists, with some predicting that the Fed will shave its benchmark rate by 0.25 percentage points — the Fed’s standard reduction — while others are predicting a jumbo cut of 0.5 percentage points. 

Regardless of the size, the rate cut will provide some relief to borrowers, albeit at a relatively small dose given that the current Fed funds’ target stands in a range of 5.25% to 5.5%. A reduction of 0.25 percentage points, for instance, would take the target range down to 5% to 5.25%, providing only a small reduction in borrowing costs. 

“By itself, one rate cut isn’t a panacea for borrowers grappling with high financing costs and has a minimal impact on the overall household budget,” noted Greg McBride, chief financial analyst at Bankrate, in an email. “What will be more significant is the cumulative effect of a series of interest rate cuts over time.”

Will the Fed cut rates later in 2024? 

Yes, economists polled by FactSet are predicting rate cuts at the Fed’s November and December meetings —there is no October rate decision meeting. Additionally, many economists expect the Fed to continue to cut throughout 2025, with most forecasting that, by May 2025, the benchmark rate will stand between 3% to 3.5%, according to FactSet.

“Our baseline forecast is for three consecutive 25bp cuts in September, November and December, and an eventual terminal rate of 3.25%-3.5%,” Goldman Sachs analysts wrote in a September 15 research note.

How will the rate cut impact mortgage rates? 

Mortgage rates have surged alongside the Fed’s hikes, with the 30-year fixed-rate loan topping 7% in 2023 as well as earlier this year. That placed homebuying out of financial reach for many would-be buyers, especially as home prices continue to climb. 

Already, mortgage rates have slid ahead of the September 18 rate decision, partly due to anticipation of a cut as well as weaker economic data. The 30-year fixed-rate mortgage currently sits at about 6.29%, the lowest rate since February 2023, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.

But the September 18 rate cut may not result in a significant additional drop in rates, especially if the economy remains relatively strong, Orphe Divounguy, senior economist at Zillow, told CBS MoneyWatch.

“We expect mortgage rates to end the year kind of roughly where they are now,” he said.

Even so, this could prove to be the right time for recently sidelined homebuyers to enter the market, Divounguy added. That’s because housing affordability is improving while inventory is scaling back up after a dip in 2022, providing buyers with more choices. 

Some homeowners with mortgages of more than 7% may also want to consider refinancing into a lower rate, experts said. For instance, a homeowner with a $400,000 mortgage could save about $400 a month by refinancing into a loan at today’s rate of about 6.3% versus the peak of about 7.8% in 2023.

“Generally, lenders would recommend refinancing when it’s a difference of 1 percentage point or more,” noted Smart Money’s Rathner. 

What about auto loans, credit cards and other debt?

Auto loan rates are likely to see reductions after the rate cut, experts said. And that could convince some consumers to start shopping around for a vehicle according to Edmunds, which found that about 6 in 10 car shoppers have held off on buying because of high rates. 

Currently, the average APR on a loan for a new car is 7.1%, and 11.3% for a used car, according to Edmunds. 

“A Fed rate cut wouldn’t necessarily drive all those consumers back into showrooms right away, but it would certainly help nudge holdout car buyers back into more of a spending mood, especially coupled with some of the advertising messages that automakers typically push during Black Friday and through the end of the year,” said Jessica Caldwell, Edmunds’ head of insights, in an email.

Likewise, credit card rates, which have been at historic highs, are likely to follow the rate cut, but this probably won’t make much of a difference for people carrying balances, said LendingTree credit analyst Matt Schulz. He calculates that someone with a $5,000 balance and a card with a 24.92% APR could save less than $1 a month on interest if their APR is reduced by one-quarter percentage point. 

A better bet, experts say, is to pay down the debt, if possible, or look for a zero-percent balance transfer card or a personal loan, which typically carries a lower rate than credit cards.

How will a Fed cut impact savings accounts and CDs?

If rate hikes have a silver lining, it’s that savers have enjoyed high rates on certificate of deposits (CDs) and high-yield savings accounts. Some banks have offered APYs as high as 5%, giving Americans a chance to juice their savings accounts.

But that may be finally coming to a close, Schulz noted. 

There’s still time for people to take advantage of relatively high rates, even if they slide slightly in the coming months, he added. “I don’t think anybody should expect rates to fall off a cliff immediately,” he said.

Still, some experts have predicted that the top savings accounts could see rates drop by as much as 0.75 percentage points after the Fed cuts rates. Even so, consumers can still benefit by moving money from a traditional savings account into a high-yield savings account, which can help them build up an emergency fund or bolster their savings with higher returns.

As for CDs, Schulz recommends people lock in rates now, if they can. “Rates are already starting to come down, and they’re only going to continue to come down,” he said. 

San Francisco — Meta late Monday said it’s banning Russian state media outlets from its apps around the world due to “foreign interference activity.”

The ban comes after the United States accused RT and employees of the state-run outlet of funneling $10 million through shell entities to covertly fund influence campaigns on social media channels including TikTok, Instagram, X and YouTube, according to an unsealed indictment.

“After careful consideration, we expanded our ongoing enforcement against Russian state media outlets,” Meta said in response to an AFP inquiry.

“Rossiya Segodnya, RT and other related entities are now banned from our apps globally for foreign interference activity,” said Meta, whose apps include Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Threads.

The Kremlin slammed Meta’s decision Tuesday. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters that, “With this action, Meta discredits itself. Such actions against Russian media are unacceptable.”

RT was forced to cease formal operations in Britain, Canada, the European Union and the United States due to sanctions after Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, according to the indictment unsealed in New York,

U.S. prosecutors quoted an RT editor in chief as saying it created an “entire empire of covert projects” designed to shape public opinion in “Western audiences.”

One of the covert projects involved funding and direction of an online content creation company in Tennessee, according to the indictment.

Since launching in late 2023, the U.S. content creation operation supported by Russia has posted nearly 2,000 videos that have logged more than 16 million views on YouTube alone, according to the indictment.

Prosecutors cited a content producer as grousing about being pressed by the company to post a video early this year of a “well known US political commentator visiting a grocery store in Russia,” complaining it felt like “overt shilling” but agreeing to put the video out.

The company never disclosed to viewers it was funded by RT, U.S. prosecutors said.

“RT has pursued malign influence campaigns in countries opposed to its policies, including the United States, in an effort to sow domestic divisions and thereby weaken opposition to Government of Russia objectives,” prosecutors argued in the indictment.

Russia is the biggest source of covert influence operations disrupted by Meta at its platform since 2017, and such efforts at deceptive online influence ramped up after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, according to threat reports released routinely by the social media giant.

Meta had previously banned the Federal News Agency in Russia to thwart foreign interference activities by the Russian Internet Research Agency.

RT capabilities were expanded early last year, when the Russian government enhanced it with “cyber operational capabilities and ties to Russian intelligence,” the U.S. State Department said in a recent release.

Cyber capabilities were focused primarily on influence and intelligence operations around the world, according to the department.

Information gathered by covert RT operations flows to Russia’s intelligence services, Russian media outlets, Russian mercenary groups and other “proxy arms” of the Russian government, the United States maintained.

The State Department said it was engaged in diplomatic efforts to inform governments around the world about Russia’s use of RT to conduct covert activities and encourage them to take action to limit “Russia’s ability to interfere in foreign elections and procure weapons for its war against Ukraine.”