Connect with us

CBS News

Is a $30,000 home equity loan or HELOC better right now?

Avatar

Published

on


gettyimages-1368368301.jpg
Home equity loans and HELOCs are beneficial under different circumstances. 

Getty Images/iStockphoto


There are several reasons why you may need access to $30,000 right now. As inflation persists, the cost of living continues to increase. So, when unexpected expenses arise – like home repairs, medical bills and more – it may be difficult to find the money you need to cover them in your budget. 

But, your home equity can help. In today’s high interest rate environment, home equity loans and home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) can open the door to borrowing power at single-digit interest rates. That’s a significant benefit when compared to other options like personal loans and credit cards that typically come with double-digit rates. 

But, which home equity borrowing option is better right now? Should you take out a home equity loan or open a HELOC if you need to borrow $30,000 worth of your equity?

Find out how affordable borrowing against your home equity can be now

Is a $30,000 home equity loan or HELOC better right now?

There are a few important factors to consider when you decide if a home equity loan or HELOC is better given your unique financial situation. The first of those is the monthly cost of the loan or credit line. Here’s what you can expect from each: 

  • 10-year home equity loan: Today’s 10-year home equity loans come with an average interest rate of 8.77%. Your payments on a $30,000 10-year loan at 8.77% would be $376.30 per month and you would pay $15,156.38 in interest over the life of the loan. 
  • 15-year home equity loan: Today’s 15-year home equity loans come with an average interest rate of 8.75%. At that rate, your payments on a $30,000 15-year home equity loan would be $299.83 and you would pay $23,970.23 in interest over the life of the loan. 
  • HELOC (with a 15-year repayment period): HELOCs have variable interest rates. That means your interest rate and payment on these lines of credit are subject to change from time to time. At the moment, HELOCs have an average interest rate of 9.16%. If that rate stayed the same through the life of your credit line, and your credit line had a 15-year repayment period, your monthly HELOC payments would be $307.14 through the repayment period on a $30,000 balance. You would pay $25,285.56 in interest over the life of the repayment period (in the unlikely chance that your interest rate and payments remain the same throughout the entire repayment period.)

It’s also important to note that home equity loans and HELOCs come with different features. Home equity loans offer your financing in one lump sum. HELOCs provide a credit line that you can use as needed through your draw period. And, home equity loans typically have fixed interest rates. So, which is better right now?

Compare leading home equity borrowing options today

When a $30,000 home equity loan would be better

A $30,000 home equity loan may be your better option if you need predictable payments. Since HELOCs usually come with variable rates, their payments may rise or fall over time. But, home equity loan interest rates are fixed. So, you’ll know how much your payments will be each month regardless of the overall interest rate environment. That stability may be important considering the fact that the cost of living is on the rise. 

Fixed rates are also beneficial if you believe overall interest rates will rise in the future. If you lock in today’s rates with a home equity loan, and interest rates head up in the future, your rate will remain the same. 

When a $30,000 HELOC would be better

A HELOC could be better if you need more flexibility in your financing. After all, having a credit line with a single-digit interest rate to tap into when you need it can be beneficial in today’s inflationary environment. 

“If you don’t know how much you need and won’t need the money all at once, a HELOC currently comes with a higher rate but it offers flexibility to draw it down over time,” explains Alex Blackwood, CEO and co-founder of the real estate investing platform, Mogul Club. “At this moment, HELOC interest rates are higher but give you the flexibility, an advantage if rates come down in the future.”

So, a HELOC makes sense if you believe interest rates will fall. If they do, your HELOC rate could follow, bringing your payments down. 

Finally, if you need a lower payment in the near term, a HELOC can help. Because of the nature of the draw period, you’ll only usually be required to pay interest during this period – which could lead to low monthly payments for the first five to 10 years of your credit line (the term of your draw period). 

Compare HELOCs among leading financial institutions now

The bottom line

Home equity loans and HELOCs both make sense under different circumstances. If you need a fixed payment or believe that interest rates will rise ahead, a home equity loan could be your better option. If you need a lower payment early on and more flexible access to funding, a HELOC may be the better choice. That’s especially true if you believe that interest rates will drop in the future. Compare your home equity borrowing options now



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

U.S. Marines, Japanese and Australian troops will train together amid heightened concerns over China

Avatar

Published

on


U.S. Marines will take part in joint training with Japanese and Australian forces in northern Australia, the three countries’ defense ministers announced Sunday as they expressed concern about a spate of confrontations with China’s increasingly assertive military.

Australia’s acting Prime Minister Richard Marles hosted U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Japanese Defense Minister Nakatani Gen for talks in Darwin, Australia.

The trilateral amphibious training between Australia, Japan and the U.S. Marine rotational force in northern Australia will begin in 2025 with Exercise Talisman Sabre. Australia will also join Exercise Orient Shield in Japan for the first time next year.

“Recognizing the critical role the trilateral partnership plays to uphold regional stability, we commit to trilateral policy coordination and to consult each other on regional security issues and contingencies,” they said in a joint statement.

In their statement, the three defense ministers reiterated “serious concern” about destabilizing actions in the East and South China seas including “dangerous conduct” by the Chinese military against Philippine and other vessels from the region. China claims the South China Sea almost in its entirety.

“We reiterate our strong opposition to any unilateral attempts to change the status quo by force or coercion,” they said, adding that it is “important that all states are free to exercise rights and freedoms consistent with international law.”

The ministers also urged the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. China claims self-ruled Taiwan as its own territory and has stepped up military harassment with frequent drills around the island.

Marles, who is also Australia’s defense minister, said following talks with his Japanese counterpart in September that both nations looked to ways to build greater familiarity between their forces. One of the “obvious opportunities” was for Japan to participate in activities during the U.S. Marine rotation in Australia, he said Sunday.

“Having a more forward-leaning opportunity for greater training with Japan and the U.S. together is a really fantastic opportunity,” he said.

Asked if the increased military cooperation would anger Beijing, Marles said the decision was about building “the best relationships possible with like-minded countries, with our friends and with our allies.”



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

Photographing the rooms of kids killed in school shootings

Avatar

Published

on


An unmade bed

A library book 12 years overdue

The next day’s outfit

Notes to her future self

Click on the door to enter



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

How do you make a portrait of a child who isn’t there? Photographer Lou Bopp found a way, but it wasn’t easy.

Avatar

Published

on


In early 2018, I was deplaning after an 18-hour flight when Steve Hartman called. He had an idea: to photograph the still-intact bedrooms of kids who had been killed in school shootings. 

It’s a headful. And six years later, I still don’t have an “elevator pitch” for the project — but then, I don’t often talk about this project. It is by far the most difficult I have ever worked on.

When Steve, my friend of about 25 years, asked me if I would like to be involved, I said yes without hesitation — even though I didn’t think we would get any families to agree. There is no way that I would have said no to partnering with him on this.

Emotionally, I was not sure how I would get through it. Within a few months I was on my way to Parkland, Florida. Alone. I’m not sure that I realized that I would be on my own. 

But here I was. An on-location commercial photographer who focuses on people and pets to create compelling, honest, textural and connective moments for large brands, per my LinkedIn professional profile, on a project where there is no one to take photos of — for the most brutal of reasons. 

How do you make a portrait of a child who is not there?

In each of these children’s rooms — the most sacred of places for these families — there was the sense that the child had just been there, and was coming right back. It was as if they’d just left their room like that when they went to school in the morning and were returning in the afternoon. 

I wanted to capture that essence.

Most kids’ bedrooms are their very own special places, and these were no different. I looked everywhere, without touching anything. I photographed inside trash cans, under beds, behind desks. Their personalities shone through in the smallest of details — hair ties on a doorknob, a toothpaste tube left uncapped, a ripped ticket for a school event — allowing me to uncover glimpses as to who they were. 

But there was an emotional challenge in addition to that creative one. Over the course of more than six years, we visited with many families around the country. The parents I spoke with seemed grateful that I was there. But each time I received a call or text from Steve about a new family, my heart sank. 

It meant another family had lost a child.

I find it unfathomable that children being killed at school is even an issue. It makes no sense. It’s impossible to process. The night prior to each one of the family visits, I didn’t sleep. And I knew I wouldn’t going into the project. It’s not a self-fulfilling prophecy. It is nerves. And empathy. And sorrow. And fear. 

In my notes from early on in the project, back in 2018, writing in seat 6H on the flight back from Nairobi, I reflected on the emotional task ahead.

“This is going to be one of the most difficult things ever, emotionally, for me, and not just work related. As I read my research documents, I get visibly emotional,” I wrote, noting my gratitude that the dark cabin prevented the other passengers from seeing me.

The prospect brought my own fears to the fore, both for myself — “I can’t help thinking about Rose,” my daughter, “and what if. I’ve lost sleep over envisioning the what-ifs well before Parkland” — and about and for meeting the families in the project: “When I read about April & Phillip and Lori’s plight, I somehow, for some reason put myself in their emotional position even though that is impossible, I have no idea, it’s beyond comprehension, I do not know what they feel. I do not know what I am going to say to them, I’m scared beyond belief. And alone.”

But just days later, I was photographing the first assignment for the project: Alyssa Alhadeff’s room. She was just 14 years old when she walked out of that room to head to Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. I was shaky meeting the family friend who greeted me at the house. Her daughter was Alyssa’s best friend, and a photo of the two girls was on the table.

According to my notes, “The room was a beautiful teenager’s messy room. My emotions were kept in check the way that they usually are; By hiding behind the camera. I removed my shoes before entering. My heart was pounding and it reverberated through my body and soul, I felt like I was in one of the most sacred and special places on Earth. I was so careful not to touch anything.”

I left feeling ready to explode in sadness and anger.

Later that day, I photographed Carmen Schentrup’s room. Her younger sister had survived the Parkland shooting, but 16-year-old Carmen was killed in her AP Psychology class. Meeting her parents, April and Phillip, was what I was most scared of. 

“I feel so much pain and compassion for them and I don’t want to say the wrong thing, drop cliches etc.,” I wrote at the time. “I spoke to Steve for guidance. He said, just be you. That’s all I can do. Just be me. He was right, those three words helped carry me through this entire project. Just be me.”

April let me in, and I worked quickly, only meeting Phillip as I was leaving. “The conversation felt like we all three were just trying to hold it together. I cannot imagine what they are going through, my heart hurts for them. This was / is such a painful project, and reconciling it will be impossible.

“I think about how anything can happen at any time to any of us. Literally. You never know,” I wrote.

After only about 16 hours on the ground in Florida, I was done with the first portion. I felt the project was a must, but I also dreaded the next call from Steve about the next family. I didn’t know when that call would come — many years later, or the very next day, possibly never. 

But last month, we — and the documentary crew that filmed us working — completed this project. While I haven’t seen it yet, I know Steve’s piece won’t be a typical Steve Hartman segment. How could it be? I know he struggled too, and we both have spent a lot of time processing this. 

I remember one August evening, I was devastated as I left the home of one of the families. Within minutes, I passed an ice cream shop crowded with other families — seemingly carefree, full of joy and laughter. The juxtaposition, mere minutes apart, cracked my soul.

I hope some way, somehow, this project can facilitate change — the only possible positive outcome for this I could comprehend. After the news cycle ends, these families will still be living with an incomprehensible nightmare.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024 Breaking MN

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.