Connect with us

CBS News

House Republicans sue Attorney General Merrick Garland, seeking Biden audio

Avatar

Published

on


Washington — House Republicans filed a lawsuit against Attorney General Merrick Garland on Monday as they seek audio recordings of President Biden’s interview with special counsel Robert Hur as part of their impeachment inquiry. 

The House Judiciary Committee’s lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in Washington is the latest escalation in the fight over the audiotapes of Hur’s interview with the president and the ghostwriter of his book, Mark Zwonitzer. Hur interviewed both men as investigated Mr. Biden’s handling of classified documents. 

The committee says it needs the audiotapes “because they offer unique and invaluable insight about information that cannot be captured in a transcript, such as vocal tone, pace, inflections, verbal nuance, and other idiosyncrasies,” according to the lawsuit. Lawmakers asked the court to order the Justice Department to hand over the material.

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland speaks during a press conference at the U.S. Department of Justice on June 27, 2024 in Washington, DC.
U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland speaks during a press conference at the U.S. Department of Justice on June 27, 2024, in Washington, DC. 

Samuel Corum / Getty Images


Hur declined to seek criminal charges against Mr. Biden for his handling of classified materials that he kept after serving as vice president, saying the evidence did not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden violated the law. The special counsel made a number of observations about the president’s memory that enraged the White House and provided political ammunition to Republicans. 

“Audio recordings are better evidence than transcripts of what happened during the Special Counsel’s interviews with President Biden and Mr. Zwonitzer,” the lawsuit said. “For example, they contain verbal and nonverbal context that is missing from a cold transcript. That verbal and nonverbal context is quite important here because the Special Counsel relied on the way that President Biden presented himself during their interview — ‘as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory’ — when ultimately recommending that President Biden should not be prosecuted for unlawfully retaining and disclosing classified information.” 

The Republican-led House voted last month to hold Garland in contempt of Congress after the White House asserted executive privilege, blocking him from releasing the recordings to lawmakers. 

But the Justice Department declined to take up the contempt referral, citing its longstanding policy to not prosecute officials for refusing to turn over subpoenaed information while citing executive privilege. 

The lawsuit argued there is “no lawful basis” for Garland’s refusal to turn over the audiotapes.

“Garland violated, and continues to violate, his legal obligation by refusing to produce to the Committee the audio recordings of the Special Counsel’s interviews with President Biden and Mark Zwonitzer when those recordings are not covered by executive privilege, and, even if they were, executive privilege has been waived,” the lawsuit said. 

Republicans have argued that the president waived executive privilege when the Justice Department released transcripts of the interviews. 

House Republicans are also considering other avenues to acquire the tapes, including holding Garland in “inherent contempt,” a tool rarely used in modern times. An inherent contempt vote, which is being pushed by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, could result in the attorney general being taken into custody, but most observers consider that outcome highly unlikely. 



Read the original article

Leave your vote

CBS News

Polls predicting historic loss for U.K.’s Conservative Party on eve of election

Avatar

Published

on


Polls predicting historic loss for U.K.’s Conservative Party on eve of election – CBS News


Watch CBS News



Voters in the United Kingdom will vote Thursday in an election that, if polls are to be believed, could end in disaster for the country’s Conservative Party. BBC correspondent Damian Grammaticas joined CBS News with more on the election.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

Arizona abortion rights advocates submit double the signatures needed to put constitutional amendment on ballot

Avatar

Published

on


Washington — Abortion rights advocates in Arizona on Wednesday submitted more than double the signatures needed to place an initiative on the November ballot that would enshrine the right to abortion in the state’s constitution.

Organizers with Arizona for Abortion Access, the coalition behind the effort, said they submitted 823,685 signatures, far more than the 383,923 required to place an initiative proposing a constitutional amendment before voters.

The Arizona Constitution requires valid signatures from 15% of registered voters for ballot questions. The secretary of state and county officials will next process the petitions and determine whether enough valid signatures were gathered to put the proposal on the ballot.

Called the Arizona Abortion Access Act, the initiative would amend the state constitution to establish the right to abortion. Under the plan, the state would not be allowed to restrict access to abortion before viability, generally around 22 to 24 weeks in a pregnancy. An abortion may be performed after viability if necessary to save the life of the mother, or her physical or mental health. The proposal prohibits the state from penalizing others for assisting a pregnant woman in exercising her right to abortion.

If the measure is cleared for the November ballot, Arizona would join at least five other states where voters will decide whether to amend their respective state constitutions to recognize the right to abortion. Those states are Colorado, Florida, Maryland, Nevada and South Dakota.

Efforts are underway in several other states, including Arkansas, Missouri, Montana and Nebraska, to get the issue on the Nov. 5 ballot.

Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June 2022 and cleared the way for states to enact laws restricting access to abortion, the issue has become a motivator for voters, and Democrats are hoping that remains the case for this year’s general election. 

In the wake of the high court’s decision, the abortion rights position has succeeded in seven states where the issue was squarely before voters. In Kansas, Kentucky and Montana, anti-abortion rights proposals failed. Meanwhile, in California, Michigan, Ohio and Vermont, measures to enshrine access in state constitutions were successful.

Abortion is banned in Arizona after 15 weeks of pregnancy. But the state recently became the center of a fierce ballot over access after its supreme court ruled that an 1864 law outlawing the procedure, except when necessary to save the mother’s life, could be enforced.

The decision set off a frenzy of legislative activity in the state, as lawmakers moved swiftly to repeal the Civil War-era law, which remained on the books but hadn’t been enforced since the 1973 Roe decision legalizing abortion nationwide. Gov. Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, signed a bill in May unwinding the pre-Roe ban, though it won’t take effect until 90 days after the end of the state legislative session, which adjourned last month.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

How much would a $70,000 home equity loan cost per month?

Avatar

Published

on


gettyimages-172370672.jpg
Home equity loan payments will vary depending on your interest rate, opening balance and more. 

Getty Images/iStockphoto


Do you have a costly home repair or remodel planned? Are you thinking about opening a business? In either case – or for a multitude of other reasons – you may need access to $70,000. There are multiple options to consider when borrowing that amount of money. Credit cards and personal loans are two alternatives to think about. But, a home equity loan could be a better option. 

These loans often come with lower interest rates because they’re attached to your home. But, with your home as security, you should ensure you can afford the payments before borrowing the money.

So, how much would a $70,000 home equity loan cost per month and how would that cost compare to the monthly cost of credit cards and personal loans? That’s what we’ll calculate below.

See what home equity loan interest rate you’re eligible for here

How much would a $70,000 home equity loan cost per month?

There are a few factors that will dictate the monthly cost of your home equity loan. These include your interest rate and loan amount. Your term can also have a meaningful impact on your payments. 

10-year and 15-year terms are some popular options to consider. And, the average interest rates for home equity loans with these are 8.74% and 8.73%, respectively. At 8.74%, your monthly payments on a 10-year $70,000 home equity loan would be $876.91. And, at 8.73%, you would pay $698.79 on a $70,000 15-year home equity loan. 

But, the monthly cost of your loan isn’t the only thing you should consider. There’s a significant difference between the overall cost of a 10-year $70,000 home equity loan and its 15-year alternative. Over 10 years, you would pay a total of $105,229.28, which includes $35,229.28 in interest. Over 15 years, you would pay a total of $125,781.76, which includes $55,781.76 in interest. 

So, while you can save on the monthly cost of your loan by opting for a 15-year term over a 10-year term, you could experience significant long-term savings by choosing the 10-year option. 

Find out how much your home equity loan payments would be today

How home equity loan costs compare to the alternatives

The difference in the monthly cost between home equity loans and personal loans or credit cards can be substantial. According to Bankrate, the average credit card interest rate is almost 21%, as of June 26, 2024. And, the average personal loan interest rate is 12.35%.

If you took out a $70,000 10-year personal loan at 12.35%, your monthly payments would be $1,018.51. If you opted for a 15-year term at the same rate, your monthly payments would be $855.94. If you opted for a 10-year term, you would pay $52,221.26 in interest while you would pay $84,069.90 in interest if you chose a 15-year term. 

And, your credit card payments on $70,000 at 21% interest would be $1,399 per month over 10 years. Of course, those payments would decline as your balance declined.

Based on these figures, you could realize substantial savings over personal loans and credit cards by borrowing $70,000 with a home equity loan instead. 

Tap into savings with a home equity loan now

The bottom line

You would pay between $698.79 and $876.91 per month on the average $70,000 home equity loan, depending on your loan’s term and interest rate. That pales in comparison to the payments ranging from $855.94 to $1,399 per month that you’d need to make if you borrowed the same amount of money with a personal loan or credit card. Compare today’s leading home equity loans to access the money you need now



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024 Breaking MN

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.