Connect with us

CBS News

Hungary’s far right Prime Minister Viktor Orbán visits Trump in Mar-a-Lago after NATO summit

Avatar

Published

on


Hungary’s nationalist prime minister, Viktor Orbán, traveled to Florida on Thursday and met with former President Donald Trump following a NATO summit in Washington, a move likely to aggravate frustrations among Western allies over similar secretive trips he made to Russia and China in recent days.

Orbán met with Trump at the former president’s beachside compound Mar-a-Lago and shared a photo of the two on social media with the caption: “We discussed ways to make peace. The good news of the day: he’s going to solve it!”

On his own social media site, Trump posted: “Thank you Viktor. There must be PEACE, and quickly.”

The Hungarian leader has openly endorsed Trump’s candidacy in this year’s presidential election and expressed hopes that the Republican will be able to bring an end to Russia’s war in Ukraine.

The European Union’s longest-serving leader has become an icon to some conservative populists for championing what he calls “illiberal democracy,” which includes restrictions on immigration and LGBTQ+ rights. He has also cracked down on the press and judiciary in Hungary and been accused by the EU of violating rule-of-law and democracy standards.

The Mar-a-Lago meeting – Orbán’s second since March – came as the latest stop on what he calls a “peace mission” aimed at finding a path toward ending Russia’s war in Ukraine.

Widely considered to have the warmest relations with the Kremlin among all EU leaders, Orbán made an unannounced visit last week to Kyiv, where he held talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Some of his critics interpreted the Kyiv visit as a sign that Hungary could take steps closer to the EU mainstream’s pro-Ukraine stance as it took over the bloc’s six-month rotating presidency earlier this month.

But those hopes were dashed when he made an unannounced trip to Moscow days later to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin, a rare trip to Russia by a European leader that drew condemnation from Kyiv and other European capitals.

After that, he flew to Beijing to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping, where he described China as a stabilizing force amid global turbulence and praised its “constructive and important” peace initiatives.

Zelenskyy said that when Orbán visited Kyiv, he didn’t know that the Hungarian leader would also travel to Moscow.

“Where he will go tomorrow? I don’t know. I don’t know. Maybe he will come again to Ukraine,” said Zelenskyy told reporters at the NATO summit in Washington.

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg added that it wasn’t up to the military alliance to decide whom member countries meet with.

“What matters for NATO is that all NATO allies agree on the policy. And we have yesterday agreed a very strong declaration from the 32 allies expressing our support to Ukraine,” Stoltenberg said Thursday.

Speaking as he arrived at the NATO summit Thursday, Finnish President Alexander Stubb rebuked Orbán for his visits to Moscow and Beijing, which EU leaders have rushed to clarify were not endorsed by other European leaders.

“I’ll say it out loud, I don’t think there’s any point in having conversations with authoritarian regimes that are violating international law,” Stubb said. “He can do it on his own behalf. But I fundamentally disagree about doing that. I simply do not see the purpose.”

President Biden, speaking at a news conference after the NATO summit, said he has “no good reason to talk to Putin right now — there’s not much that he is prepared to do in terms of accommodating any change in his behavior.”

Orbán seemed isolated at the summit in Washington and hardly spoke to reporters, Agence France-Presse noted.

Orbán has sought close ties to Trump and other conservative Republicans and expressed his belief that a new Trump presidency was the “only serious chance” for an end to the war in Ukraine.

Trump has repeatedly said he could settle the war “in 24 hours” if he’s elected president again by meeting with both Putin and Zelenskyy – a claim Russia’s United Nations ambassador has disputed.

White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan on Thursday signaled concern that a Trump-Orbán meeting would run counter to Ukraine’s interests, saying, “The U.S. position – the Biden administration position – is nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine.”

“Whatever adventurism that is being undertaken without Ukraine’s consent or support, you know, is not something that’s consistent with our policy, the foreign policy of the United States,” Sullivan told reporters, adding that he “can’t speculate as to what Orbán is up to, exactly.”

Some observers have raised concerns that Orbán’s pursuit of a separate foreign policy on Russia and China than that of his EU and NATO partners threatens to undermine those groups’ unity.

European governments, meanwhile, have engaged in deep consultations on what they could do to ensure that NATO, Western support for Ukraine and the security of individual NATO countries will endure should Trump – one of the military alliance’s most prominent critics – win back the presidency in November and temper U.S. contributions.

Daniel Fried, a former longtime diplomat and expert on Eastern Europe in the U.S. government, said Orban’s links with China could be hard for Trump to defend given his own get-tough messages toward Beijing.

Otherwise, however, it’s entirely natural, and good leadership, for foreign governments to be reaching out to possible next presidents of the U.S., Fried said.

“A lot of the foreign ministers and other people are probably having side meetings with people near Trump World” on the summit sidelines, he said. “In their place, I would do the same.”





Read the original article

Leave your vote

CBS News

Historian Kenneth C. Davis on the power of reading

Avatar

Published

on


Historian Kenneth C. Davis on the power of reading – CBS News


Watch CBS News



Kenneth C. Davis, author of “The World in Books,” joins “CBS Mornings” to talk about the power of reading and the need to fight for the right to access books in an era of increasing bans across the U.S.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

Your friend loves a candidate you hate. Can your relationship survive?

Avatar

Published

on


With Election Day around the corner, political divides grow deeper and relationships with certain friends and family members may feel increasingly strained. It leaves some wondering whether to sever ties over fundamental differences in political views.

While it’s been debated for a few elections cycles, experts say the question weighs even more heavily this year. 

Dr. Judy Ho, a clinical and forensic neuropsychologist and author of “The New Rules of Attachment,” has seen this dilemma ramp up recently in both her personal and professional life.

“If you encounter enough people, there’s going to be somebody who’s not the same as your views, and some people just get so much more fired up about it, and then it becomes extremely personal really quickly,” she told CBS News. 

The issue has even made celeb-studded headlines, with social media users dissecting the friendship between Taylor Swift, who made waves by endorsing Kamala Harris, and Brittany Mahomes, who Donald Trump praised last month for “defending” him.

Can you remain friends with people who hold political views antithetical to your own? Experts say there are a few things to consider when it comes to navigating political divides among loved ones. 

Why political differences cause problems

“Political divides are really problematic for relationships because they’re often deeply intertwined with people’s identities and core values,” Ho said. “When the beliefs are challenged, then it feels like a much more personal attack, and it triggers a defensive reaction.”

She said some research shows that when people encounter statements that contradict their deeply held beliefs, their brains react similarly to facing a physical threat.

“It puts them into a fight or flight stance, and that makes conversation impossible, because when you’re in fight or flight, you’re not going to have any kind of productive conversation,” she said. 

That’s why we tend to see disagreements that lead to unfriending someone occur more often around social views, and less around something like economic policy, said Dr. Laura Vogel, psychologist and director of mental health services at Momentous Institute.

“Particularly around those social views, that’s where it begins to connect to my identity as a person, who I am, what my faith is, those sorts of things,” she said. 

How to decide if your friendship has a future

So, how do you know when it’s time to take a step back — or completely away — from a friend or family member over these disagreements?

First, assess the relationship, experts advise.

Think about how much value this person adds to your life, Ho suggests, and also consider the logistics of whether if you’re going to see this person all the time at work or if they’re part of your family.

“Is it going to be really that feasible to just completely cut them off?” Ho said. “If a person is of value to you in some way, is important to you, then it’s important to try to work through the conflict instead of just completely shutting it out or completely never speaking to them about anything related to their beliefs.”

Vogel also suggests slowing down and thinking, “If I unfriend them, what impact will this have on me?” 

“When we are flooded with emotion, whether that’s shock or anger or shame, none of us make really good, thoughtful decisions,” she said. “Let that emotion settle and really reflect … and then make a decision. And I can’t tell anybody what that is, everyone’s going to have a different range of what is best for you.”

If you want to move forward with this person in your life, the next step may include having a conversation with them to better understand their views or to set certain boundaries. 

“If this is an important relationship, that’s where we want to really slow down and resist that temptation to make a snap decision, an impulsive decision, and then consider whether a conversation is important and necessary — a live conversation, not a Facebook conversation,” Vogel said. 

Your decision doesn’t have to be all-or-nothing, “remain close friends” or “completely cut them off,” experts say. Instead, you may decide to mentally or privately take a step back from someone but remain on amicable terms.

“If it’s a person who you share friends with, you can still see each other at parties and big get-togethers, but do you need to be calling them? No, you don’t,” Ho said. “It doesn’t have to be this huge black-and-white approach, because I don’t think that that’s always feasible.”

Social media versus real life

The threshold for “unfriending” someone in real life compared to on social media is typically different, too. 

“If you’re feeling a lot of stress and anxiety every time you get on social media, and it’s a handful of people that are creating that and you don’t really have a relationship with them, I think it’s good for us to have boundaries,” Vogel said.

Ho added that “muting” is a great option if you don’t want to see someone’s posts without outright “unfriending” or “unfollowing” them, which they may see. 

“I definitely think the bar is lower for online consumption, because we know that just passive consumption of things can really affect your mindset,” Ho said. 

On the other hand, real-life friends who you have more meaningful relationships with may be well worth the extra effort it takes to navigate differences. 

“Our good friends can challenge us,” Vogel said. “There’s that argument of, ‘You’re in this echo chamber and you’re not talking to people who have different perspectives than you.’ I think good friends who care about us can come to the conversations with curiosity and be able to listen to your perspective, and then you’re curious about how they’ve come to their perspective. But that’s a much more civil conversation, typically, with a good friend where you value each other versus somebody that you really don’t interact with anymore.”



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

McDonald’s introduces the Chicken Big Mac

Avatar

Published

on


McDonald’s introduces the Chicken Big Mac – CBS News


Watch CBS News



McDonald’s adds the Chicken Big Mac to its menu for a limited time, offering a fresh take on the classic sandwich with chicken patties and no onions.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024 Breaking MN

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.