Connect with us

CBS News

3 ways your credit card debt can be forgiven

Avatar

Published

on


A debit card balanced on the edge of a shelf
If you’re feeling overwhelmed by expensive credit card debt, there are a few different debt forgiveness options to pursue.

Getty Images


Credit card debt can be a significant financial burden, but it’s one that many Americans are carrying. Not only does the average cardholder have nearly $8,000 in credit card debt currently, but the average rate on that card debt is close to 23% right now. And with rates that high (or higher), it’s easy for any revolving credit card balance to become problematic over time.

That’s why it’s so important to pay off what you owe on your credit cards as quickly as possible. If you let the balance carry over month after month, it will balloon due to compound interest charges. And, if you’re only chipping away at it with minimum payments each month, it could take years or decades to get rid of. 

But it doesn’t have to take that long. If you’re facing high amounts of credit card debt, there are a few routes you can take to have your credit card debt forgiven. Below, we’ll detail what to know.

Learn how debt forgiveness (and other debt relief options) could benefit you now.

3 ways your credit card debt can be forgiven

If you want to have some or all of your credit card debt forgiven, consider these options:

Debt settlement through a debt relief agency

One option you have for pursuing credit card debt forgiveness is to enroll in a debt settlement (or debt forgiveness) program with a debt relief agency. When you enroll in this type of program, you work with experts to negotiate with your creditors to pay less than the full amount owed on your credit cards. If negotiations are successful, the credit card companies effectively forgive a portion of your debt. Here’s how it works:

  • You enroll in a program with a debt relief agency and the experts you work with will analyze your debts and income to determine the right path forward.
  • The agency advises you to stop making payments to your creditors and instead send in monthly payments based on what you can afford to pay. That money is then saved in a dedicated account.
  • Once enough money has accrued in that account, the agency negotiates with your creditors to accept a lump sum payment that’s less than your total debt.
  • If the creditor agrees, you pay the settled amount, and the remaining debt is forgiven.

There are a few potential benefits and downsides to consider with this option, though:

Pros:

  • Can significantly reduce the amount you owe, sometimes by up to 50% or more
  • Provides professional negotiation expertise, which can result in better outcomes in certain cases
  • May have established relationships with creditors, further increasing the chances of a positive outcome
  • Can resolve debt faster than making just the minimum payments

Cons:

Speak with an expert about your options today.

Direct negotiations with your creditors

You don’t have to work with a debt relief company to try and get your creditors to forgive a portion of your balance. If you’d prefer to avoid the fees tied to debt relief agencies or have strong negotiation skills, you can attempt to negotiate debt settlement directly with your creditors instead. Here’s how it works:

  • You contact your creditors directly and explain your financial hardship. You may need to show proof that you’re unable to maintain your payments or pay off what you owe.
  • During this process, you offer a lump sum payment that’s less than the full amount owed. 
  • If the creditor agrees, you pay the negotiated amount to settle the debt.

The potential benefits and downsides to consider with this type of debt forgiveness include:

Pros:

  • No fees to debt relief agencies, potentially saving you money
  • More control over the negotiation process
  • Potential for immediate resolution if you have funds available for a lump sum payment

Cons:

  • Requires strong negotiation skills and knowledge of debt settlement practices
  • Time consuming process, especially if dealing with multiple creditors
  • Still carries a potential credit score impact and tax implications

Bankruptcy

Bankruptcy is a legal process that can lead to the forgiveness of credit card debt through either discharge (Chapter 7) or restructuring (Chapter 13). It’s generally considered a last resort due to its long-lasting impacts. Here’s how it works:

  • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy:
    • Liquidates your non-exempt assets to pay creditors
    • Most remaining unsecured debts, including credit card balances, are discharged
    • Typically takes 4-6 months to complete
  • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy:
    • Establishes a 3-5 year repayment plan to pay off some or all of your debts
    • Remaining unsecured debts may be discharged at the end of the repayment period

As with the other debt forgiveness options, there are benefits and downsides to consider with bankruptcy, including:

Pros:

  • Can provide a fresh financial start
  • Automatic stay stops creditor collection activities
  • Can discharge most unsecured debts, including credit cards

Cons:

  • Long-term impact on your credit score 
  • Can make it difficult to obtain credit, housing or employment in the future
  • Often requires an attorney to help navigate the legal process

The bottom line

Credit card debt forgiveness can provide a path to financial recovery if you’re struggling with overwhelming balances, but each method comes with its own set of advantages and drawbacks. That’s why it’s essential to carefully evaluate your specific financial situation before deciding on a course of action. And remember, the best approach to credit card debt is prevention. So, no matter what route you take, developing sound financial habits and using credit responsibly is necessary to avoid the need for debt forgiveness in the future. 



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

The Menendez Brothers’ Fight for Freedom

Avatar

Published

on


The Menendez Brothers’ Fight for Freedom – CBS News


Watch CBS News



The Menendez brothers were given life sentences for gunning down their own parents. Now they’re hoping new evidence could reopen the case. “48 Hours” contributor Natalie Morales reports.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

9/28: CBS Weekend News – CBS News

Avatar

Published

on


9/28: CBS Weekend News – CBS News


Watch CBS News



Helene death toll rises, millions still without power; Bear sightings unnerve California communities

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

California Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoes bill requiring speeding alerts in new cars

Avatar

Published

on


California Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed a bill Saturday that would have required new cars to beep at drivers if they exceed the speed limit in an effort to reduce traffic deaths.

California would have become the first to require such systems for all new cars, trucks and buses sold in the state starting in 2030. The bill would have mandated that vehicles beep at drivers when they exceed the speed limit by at least 10 mph.

The European Union has passed similar legislation to encourage drivers to slow down. California’s proposal would have provided exceptions for emergency vehicles, motorcycles and motorized scooters.

In explaining his veto, Newsom said federal law already dictates vehicle safety standards and adding California-specific requirements would create a patchwork of regulations.

The National Highway Traffic Safety “is also actively evaluating intelligent speed assistance systems, and imposing state-level mandates at this time risks disrupting these ongoing federal assessments,” the Democratic governor said.

Opponents, including automotive groups and the state Chamber of Commerce, said such regulations should be decided by the federal government, which earlier this year established new requirements for automatic emergency braking to curb traffic deaths. Republican lawmakers also said the proposal could make cars more expensive and distract drivers.

The legislation would have likely impacted all new car sales in the U.S., since the California market is so large that car manufacturers would likely just make all of their vehicles comply.

California often throws that weight around to influence national and even international policy. The state has set its own emission standards for cars for decades, rules that more than a dozen other states have also adopted. And when California announced it would eventually ban the sale of new gas-powered cars, major automakers soon followed with their own announcement to phase out fossil-fuel vehicles.

Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener, who sponsored the bill, called the veto disappointing and a setback for street safety.

“California should have led on this crisis as Wisconsin did in passing the first seatbelt mandate in 1961,” Wiener said in a statement. “Instead, this veto resigns Californians to a completely unnecessary risk of fatality.”

The speeding alert technology, known as intelligent speed assistance, uses GPS to compare a vehicle’s pace with a dataset of posted limits. If the car is at least 10 mph over, the system emits a single, brief, visual and audio alert.

The proposal would have required the state to maintain a list of posted speed limits, and it’s likely that those would not include local roads or recent changes in speed limits, resulting in conflicts.

The technology has been used in the U.S. and Europe for years. Starting in July, the European Union will require all new cars to have the technology, although drivers would be able to turn it off. At least 18 manufacturers including Ford, BMW, Mercedes-Benz and Nissan, have already offered some form of speed limiters on some models sold in America, according to the National Transportation Safety Board.

The National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration estimates that 10% of all car crashes reported to police in 2021 were related to speeding. This was especially a problem in California, where 35% of traffic fatalities were speeding-related — the second highest in the country, according to a legislative analysis of the proposal.

Last year the NTSB recommended federal regulators require all new cars to alert drivers when they speed. Their recommendation came after a crash in January 2022, when a man with a history of speeding violations ran a red light at more than 100 mph and struck a minivan, killing himself and eight other people.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024 Breaking MN

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.