Connect with us

CBS News

California teachers don’t get paid family leave. Gov. Newsom vetoed a bill to change that. Lawmakers are trying again.

Avatar

Published

on


Why are California teachers excluded from paid family leave? | CBS News California Investigates


Why are California teachers excluded from paid family leave?

04:58

As a new school year begins, lawmakers are again trying to give public school teachers paid family leave.

Supporters believe the benefit will help attract and retain high-quality teachers in the face of an increasing shortage. But critics worry that the bill—which has widespread support among the Democratic majority in the Legislature and is a priority for the Legislative Women’s Caucus—could come at the actual expense of students.

The union-backed bill, authored by the Democratic Majority Leader Cecilia Aguiar-Curry, would give teachers 14 weeks of fully paid leave after having a baby, paid for by school districts through existing state funding.

Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed a similar bill in 2019, but won’t say which way he’s leaning on this legislation, which goes even further than the bill he vetoed.

The reality is that hundreds of thousands of California teachers and public employees are still not entitled to paid leave after having a baby. In fact, teachers effectively have to pay for their own substitute teacher after giving birth.

Teachers excluded from receiving paid family leave 

In 2019, CBS News California Investigative Correspondent Julie Watts discussed the issue with Newsom, shortly before he vetoed a previous bill that would have provided paid family leave for teachers. 

At the time, the Governor had recently increased paid family leave for most other Californians. However, teachers and public employees were excluded under existing state law. 

WATCH 2019 STORY: Many California public employees ineligible for paid family leave

“So just to be clear, there’s nothing that you, as the Governor, can do to basically allow anybody who wants [to] to opt [in]?” CBS News California asked Newsom in 2019.

“Well, there’s a lot the Governor can do, and we’re pursuing that,” Newsom responded. “And every day, we’re pursuing more of that.”

He went on to criticize then-President Donald Trump.

“I remember on the campaign trail a guy by the name of Donald Trump talking about paid family leave,” Newsom recounted during the interview. “I’d love him to fulfill a promise. Maybe this is one he could consider.”

“Nothing has happened”

“So what have you done?” asked Pittsburg, California teacher Emily Price as she watched Newsom’s 2019 interview five years later. 

CBS News also interviewed Price in 2019. At the time, she was a Southern California public school teacher with a brand new baby. 

WATCH 2019 STORY: Many California public employees ineligible for paid family leave

“People are surprised,” Price said in 2019. “They think, ‘Oh, you’re out on maternity leave, getting paid to take care of your baby.’ … It’s like no, not really, ran out of pay a while ago.”

A lot has changed in Price’s life since we first interviewed her and Newsom.

Today, she teaches in the Bay Area – and her baby starts kindergarten this week.

But one thing hasn’t changed: public school teachers still aren’t eligible for paid family leave in California.

“It’s been five years. Like, nothing has happened. So, we need your help, Governor,” Price said.

Watch the full 2019 Paid Family Leave interview with Governor Gavin Newsom


RAW: CBS13 Investigator Julie Watts Sits Down With Governor Newsom by
CBS News Sacramento on
YouTube

Who gets paid family leave in California? 

Most Californians are entitled to up to 16 weeks of paid leave after having a baby. 

New moms are entitled to up to eight weeks of disability pay to recover after birth. Newsom signed legislation in 2022 that increases maternity disability pay for lower-wage workers to 90% of their salary beginning in 2025

California also offers another eight weeks of paid family leave — up to 70% of a person’s salary — for mothers, fathers and adoptive parents to bond with a new baby. Other Californians can use the eight weeks of paid family leave to care for a sick relative. 

Public school teachers aren’t entitled to any of it.

“It’s already hard enough to be a teacher,” Price said. “Like, we don’t go into teaching for the money.”

More than 70% of teachers are women. According to data from California State Teachers’ Retirement System, cited in the Assembly Appropriations analysis for its bill, women teachers average nearly $100,000 less in retirement than their male counterparts, in part because they’re forced to use up their accrued vacation and sick leave when they have babies.

“I know many teachers who try to time their pregnancies to align with summer,” Price said.

And those who can’t time their pregnancies to summer vacation often return to work without any sick leave to use when they, or their children, inevitably become ill.

Collective bargaining 

“There are hundreds of thousands of Californians who are not entitled to this leave right now. How is that possible?” CBS News California asked Newsom in 2019.

“It’s possible because they haven’t bargained for it,” Newsom said.

He explained that paid leave is something the unions must collectively bargain for. Members can’t individually opt-in.

Since that interview, the number of state employees without paid leave has decreased, according to data obtained by CBS News California Investigates from California’s Labor & Workforce Development Agency. 

In 2019, CBS News California identified 95,000 state employees who were not entitled to paid family leave, along with an unknown number of city, county, special district and federal employees, and the majority of the more than 300,000 California teachers.

Updated data now indicate an estimated 52,000 state employees belong to unions that still have not bargained for paid family leave, including California Highway Patrol, firefighters, corrections officers, and at least four other categories of state employees. 

Five years later, the California Teachers Association says the vast majority of its members still do not have paid family leave. However, the CTA could not provide a comprehensive list of local unions with or without the benefit, so it is unclear how many teachers still lack paid leave. 

CTA representatives cited anecdotal examples and explained that while some local teachers’ unions have successfully negotiated some paid leave with their school districts, they say other districts refuse to negotiate paid leave without state guidance or a mandate. 

Why can’t teachers opt-in to disability and paid family leave?

California’s paid family leave is paid for by a 1% disability tax on your paycheck. However, under state law, public employees don’t pay into State Disability Insurance (SDI). So they can’t collect.

“I don’t understand why that’s not an option,” Price said. “Yes, I’ll give a portion of my salary to be able to access this amazing benefit.”

Instead, public school teachers get 12 weeks of unpaid leave and must use up any vacation or sick leave before they effectively pay for their own substitute teacher – up to 50% of their salary.

“Why can’t the state allow individuals to opt into disability insurance,” CBS News California asked Gov. Newsom in 2019.

“Our task force … This is what we’re exploring,” Newsom said, referring to the Paid Family Leave Task Force he created in 2019. 

CBS News California asked the Governor to sit down with us again to discuss paid family leave for teachers, now five years later. His office denied our multiple requests, telling us that the Governor was too busy. 

In lieu of an interview, CBS News California asked for examples of what he and his Paid Family Leave Task Force had done since we last spoke – specifically to address paid family leave for California’s 300,000+ teachers. 

His office sent a list of accomplishments, including expanding paid family leave from 6 to 8 weeks in 2019, expanding it further in 2020 and increasing disability wage replacement rates to 90% pay in 2025.

However, the Governor’s office couldn’t point to any accomplishments that helped increase wage replacement or provided any paid family leave for teachers. 

California lawmakers rally behind new bill

Assembly Majority Leader and Vice Chair of the Woman’s Caucus Cecilia Aguiar-Curry wants to give teachers 14 weeks of fully paid leave, paid for by school districts through Prop 98 funding instead of California’s overburdened state budget.

“Paying for their own sub. Do you think that’s fair? Come on,” Aguiar-Curry told CBS News California in an interview on the assembly floor last week. 

Her union-backed bill has widespread support among the Democrat majority, but the Governor vetoed a similar bill shortly after our last interview

His veto message stated, in part, “[T]his bill will likely result in annual costs of tens of millions of dollars that should be considered as part of the annual budget process and as part of local collective bargaining.”

“What do you say to the critics who say you’re sacrificing funding for students to pay the teachers?” CBS News California asked Aguiar-Curry.

“I’m saying to them, a happy instructor is a happy classroom is a happy child,” she said. “I’m also saying to the Governor, you mentioned you wanted to make sure this was in the budget. You never did it.”

As a teacher, Emily said that she is concerned the bill could divert funding from programs for students.

“I see year after year different programs and services being cut,” Price said.

However, as a parent, she says she is just as concerned about the increasing teacher shortage. 

And as a parent who is also a teacher, she believes paid family leave will help attract and retain quality teachers.

What’s next?

The bill, “AB 2901: School and community college employees: paid disability and parental leave,” has 17 co-authors, which is a sign that it is popular among Democratic lawmakers. 

The Assembly already passed this bill, so it’s up to the Senate, which could vote as early as next week.

But anything can happen, especially if the Governor doesn’t want to sign it.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

CBS News

How do your views on climate change compare to others in your area? Take this quiz and find out

Avatar

Published

on


Poll: People want Congress to act on climate


Americans want Congress to do more for the climate, poll finds

03:54

About two-thirds of Americans say they are worried about climate change. Nearly 8 in 10 Americans support funding research into renewable energy, and 3 out of 4 support regulating carbon emissions. More than 60% believe Congress should do more to address climate change, according to data from the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.  

Even in Jack County, Texas, where Donald Trump received 90% of the vote in 2020, 58% support regulating carbon emissions. That’s the lowest of any U.S. county. 

Still, climate change remains a deeply polarizing issue within Congress and on the campaign trail

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which the White House called “the most significant climate action in U.S. history,” provided nearly $400 billion for climate solutions. It passed Congress strictly along party lines, with no Republicans voting in favor. 

In 2023, Democrats voted for pro-environmental legislation more than 90% of the time, while Republicans voted for pro-environmental legislation less than 5% of the time, according to voting data collected by the League of Conservation Voters. 

“We see pretty much across the board, at all levels of government, that government officials dramatically underestimate the level of support from their own constituents,” Tony Leiserowitz, the director of the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, told CBS News.

Answer the questions below — which are a selection of the same questions asked by the Yale program’s survey to create their Climate Opinion Maps — to see how your beliefs about climate change compare to others in your area and the nation. 



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

Ice cream shops and pharmacy linked to ruthless Mexico cartel, U.S. Treasury Department says

Avatar

Published

on


The U.S. Treasury Department on Tuesday said it sanctioned two Mexican businesses – an ice cream chain and a local pharmacy – for allegedly using proceeds of fentanyl trafficking to finance their operations tied to the Sinaloa cartel.

The move comes as rival cartel factions have been in a deadly conflict with each other and authorities following the surprise arrest on U.S. soil of Sinaloa Cartel co-founder Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada in late July, which is believed to have unleashed an internal power struggle within the group.

Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control — the U.S. agency that combats illicit funds and money laundering — said people previously cited for money laundering had set up a chain of ice cream and popsicle shops in the state of Sinaloa.

The Sinaloa cartel often uses their earnings from international drug trafficking to establish businesses, pouring cash into everything from fraudulent timeshare operations to restaurants to launder money.

OFAC said that another individual set up a pharmacy and convenience store using drug proceeds in the northern state of Sonora.

“President Biden and Vice President Harris are committed to using every tool at our disposal to combat the cartels that are poisoning our communities with fentanyl and other deadly drugs,” said Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Wally Adeyemo in a statement.

The sanctions come days after the U.S. rejected accusations by Mexico’s President that the U.S. was partly responsible for a surge in cartel warfare that left dozens of people dead in Sinaloa.

MEXICO-MILITARY-CRIME-DRUGS
Soldiers of the Mexican Army patrol the streets of Culiacan, Sinaloa State, Mexico, on September 21, 2024. 

IVAN MEDINA/AFP via Getty Images


The cartel is responsible for a significant portion of fentanyl trafficking into the U.S. They precursor chemicals from China and India to make the synthetic opioid and smuggle it into the United States, where it causes about 70,000 overdose deaths annually.

Jesús Norberto Larrañaga Herrera, known as “El 30”, and Karla Gabriela Lizárraga Sánchez, established “Nieves y Paletas,” an ice cream chain with several storefront locations around the capital using drug proceeds, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.

OFAC said a retail pharmacy and convenience store in Sonora were tied to drug trafficker José Arnoldo Morgan Huerta, nicknamed “Chachio.” His brother, Juan Carlos Morgan Huerta, known as “Cacayo,” is a Sinaloa cartel “plaza boss” and oversees drug trafficking in the border city of Nogales.

“Today’s action is part of a whole-of-government effort to counter the global threat posed by the trafficking of illicit drugs into the United States that is causing the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans annually, as well as countless more non-fatal overdoses,” the U.S. Treasury Department said in the statement.

Separately, the Treasury Department also announced Tuesday it was sanctioning five leaders of Colombia’s Clan del Golfo (CDG), a top drug trafficking network. 

The Gulf Clan “is one of the country’s largest drug trafficking organizations and a key contributor to human smuggling through the Darién Gap,” officials said in a statement.

In July, U.S. President Joe Biden announced a series of proposals aimed at curbing the ongoing drug epidemic. These include a push on Congress to pass legislation to establish a pill press and tableting machine registry and enhance penalties against convicted drug smugglers and traffickers of fentanyl.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

House to vote on 3-month funding extension to avoid government shutdown

Avatar

Published

on


Washington — The House is set to vote Wednesday on a stopgap measure to keep the government funded for three months, after Speaker Mike Johnson embraced a clean temporary funding measure that will need support from Democrats to pass. 

Last week, the House rejected Johnson’s initial funding plan, which would have kept the government funded for around six months and was paired with a noncitizen voting measure that Democrats viewed as a nonstarter. After the setback, which was driven in part by his own party, the speaker said he would opt to bring up a vote on a measure to extend funding through Dec. 20 without the voting proposal, rather than risk a government shutdown weeks ahead of Election Day. 

Then on Monday, Johnson was delivered another setback when the stopgap measure failed to secure enough support on the House Rules Committee, forcing House leadership to bring up the funding bill for a floor vote under suspension of the rules — a process that requires support from two-thirds of the chamber for passage.

Johnson said on Tuesday that he expects the continuing resolution to “pass by a wide margin,” while making clear that he thought “the best play under the circumstances was the CR with the SAVE Act,” referring to the voting measure.

“This was our opportunity to both vote to fund the government and ensure the security of the election, but we came a little short of the goal line,” Johnson said. “So we have to go with the last available play.”

The speaker called the legislation a “very narrow, bare bones” temporary measure. And while he noted that “we loathe [continuing resolutions] as much as anyone,” he said “it would be political malpractice to shut the government down.”

The government funding vote

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speaks during a news conference after a House Republican Caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 24, 2024, in Washington, D.C.
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speaks during a news conference after a House Republican Caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 24, 2024, in Washington, D.C.

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images


The vote on the funding measure Wednesday could draw more support from Democrats than Republicans, given conservative opposition to the continuing resolution. The same dynamic has occurred in recent funding disputes, putting House Republican leadership in an uncomfortable position with their conference.

House Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar said on Tuesday that with Johnson’s move to proceed with the vote, the belief is “he has the Republicans to pass the bill,” adding that Democrats will “work in a bipartisan way to make sure that this gets done.”

The House is set to depart for a lengthy recess following the vote to keep the government funded, and won’t return until after the Nov. 5 election. And with the three-month funding measure, they’ll face a pre-holiday deadline to prevent a shutdown after their return. House Republicans have fretted about the outcome, which Congress frequently falls back upon. But Johnson said on Tuesday that House leadership opposes an omnibus funding package around the holidays.

“I have no intention of going back to that terrible tradition,” Johnson said, suggesting that he would push to approve the 12 full-year spending bills after the election. 

The Senate will also need to act to prevent a shutdown ahead of the Oct. 1 deadline, assuming the House bill passes. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer encouraged the House to approve the continuing resolution “quickly,” saying on Tuesday afternoon that “time is of the essence.” He outlined that the Senate will move swiftly on the stopgap measure once it passes the lower chamber to avert the shutdown threat. 

“If we work together, stay away from poison pills and partisanship, we can avoid a government shutdown,” Schumer said. 



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024 Breaking MN

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.