Connect with us

CBS News

Should you lock in a mortgage rate after the Fed cuts rates?

Avatar

Published

on


gettyimages-1063253498.jpg
There are pros and cons to locking in a lower mortgage rate this month.

Getty Images/iStockphoto


The moment homebuyers have been waiting for will soon be here: the Federal Reserve will finally cut its federal funds rate. 

Frozen at a range between 5.25% and 5.50% — the highest level in decades — the Fed is now poised to issue its first rate cut since 2020 when they conclude their next meeting on September 18. And while mortgage interest rates have already been falling in anticipation of this reduction, they could drop even further once a rate cut is formalized. 

But what should homebuyers do when this happens? And, more specifically, should they lock in a new, lower rate post-meeting or continue to wait on the sidelines? That’s what we’ll break down below.

See how low of a mortgage interest rate you could secure here now.

Should you lock in a mortgage rate after the Fed cuts rates?

While every homebuyer’s financial situation differs, there are some pros and cons to be aware of if you’re considering locking in a mortgage rate once the first rate cut of 2024 is issued. Here are three of each:

Pros to locking in a mortgage rate after the Fed cuts rates

  • You’ll be locked at a lower rate: Locking a lower mortgage interest rate as soon as it becomes available will ensure that you don’t have to worry about any adverse market conditions that could cause rates to rise again. You’ll be locked in, possibly for multiple months, depending on the lender being used. So you can rest assured knowing that you won’t have to pay a higher rate when you’re ready to close.
  • You can more accurately budget: A locked interest rate will allow you to more accurately determine your budget. It won’t be theoretical anymore. You’ll know exactly what your mortgage payments will be for both the principal and interest. 
  • You can focus on other priorities: Monitoring mortgage rates on a daily basis can be both time-consuming and stressful. But you won’t have to worry about doing so once you have a rate locked. Instead, you can focus on all of the other steps that will move you toward closing, like an inspection, appraisal and more.

Learn more about your current mortgage options here.

Cons to locking in a mortgage rate after the Fed cuts rates

  • You could lose an even lower rate: Locking in a rate now could very well mean that you lose the chance to secure an even lower one in the future. So be sure to weigh the likelihood of additional rate cuts ahead versus what you can secure now. In today’s cooling rate climate, even waiting a few weeks could prove beneficial. 
  • There may be a fee to unlock: If you do find a lower interest rate after you’ve already locked one in there may be a fee that you’re required to pay your lender to unlock the old one and lock in the new one instead. Be sure to ask about this before locking in any rates to better determine the right time to act. 
  • It won’t last forever: Even if you do find the lowest, ideal mortgage interest rate, a lock won’t last forever. Lenders cap how long your rate can be locked in and you may have to pay a fee to extend it — or be forced to close on a home earlier than you otherwise would to prevent losing the locked rate. So don’t just lock a rate now without having an approximate idea of when you could ultimately close on the home.

The bottom line

Locking in a mortgage rate after the Fed issues its first rate cut may be tempting, especially for those buyers who have waited years for a lower offer, but it may not be the right move for every buyer. Instead, carefully weigh the pros and cons of locking in a mortgage rate next week versus later in the year to best determine which action works best for you. But don’t wait too long, either. A lower rate climate could lead to increasing home prices and steeper buyer competition, either of which can quickly negate some (or all) of the savings secured with a lower rate. 



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

Yellowstone hiker burned when she falls into scalding water near Old Faithful, park officials say

Avatar

Published

on



9/18: CBS Evening News

19:57

Yellowstone National Park, Wyo. — A New Hampshire woman suffered severe burns on her leg after hiking off-trail in Yellowstone National Park and falling into scalding water in a thermal area near the Old Faithful geyser, park officials said.

The 60-year-old woman from Windsor, New Hampshire, along with her husband and their leashed dog were walking off a designated trail near the Mallard Lake Trailhead on Monday afternoon when she broke through a thin crust over the water and suffered second- and third-degree burns to her lower leg, park officials said. Her husband and the dog weren’t injured.

The woman was flown to Eastern Idaho Regional Medical Center in Idaho Falls, Idaho for treatment.

old-faithful-sign-yellowstone-national-park.jpg
Old Faithful northbound sign in Yellowstone National Park

National Park Service / Jacob W. Frank


Park visitors are reminded to stay on boardwalks and trails in hydrothermal areas and exercise extreme caution. The ground in those areas is fragile and thin and there’s scalding water just below the surface, park officials said.

Pets are allowed in limited, developed areas of Yellowstone park but are prohibited on boardwalks, hiking trails, in the backcountry and in thermal areas.

The incident is under investigation. The woman’s name wasn’t made public.

This is the first known thermal injury in Yellowstone in 2024, park officials said in a statement. The park had recorded 3.5 million visitors through August this year.

Hot springs have injured and killed more people in Yellowstone National Park than any other natural feature, the National Park Service said. At least 22 people have died from hot spring-related injuries in and around the 3,471-square-mile national park since 1890, park officials have said.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

LaMonica McIver wins special House election in New Jersey for late Donald Payne Jr.’s seat

Avatar

Published

on


LaMonica McIver wins special House Democratic primary in N.J.


LaMonica McIver wins special House Democratic primary in N.J.

00:32

TRENTON, N.J. Democratic Newark City Council President LaMonica McIver has defeated Republican small businessman Carmen Bucco in a contest in New Jersey’s 10th Congressional District that opened up because of the death of Rep. Donald Payne Jr. in April.

McIver will serve out the remainder of Payne’s term, which ends in January. She and Bucco will face a rematch on the November ballot for the full term.

McIver said in a statement Wednesday that she stands on the “shoulders of giants,” naming Payne as chief among them.

She cast ahead to the November election, saying the right to make reproductive health choices was on the ballot as well as whether the economy should benefit the wealthy or “hard working Americans.”

“I will fight because the purpose of politics and the purpose of our vote is to give the people of our communities and our nation a bold voice,” she said.

Bucco congratulated McIver on the victory in a statement but said he’s looking forward to the rematch in November.

“I am not going anywhere,” he said in an email. “We still have a second chance to make district 10 great again!”

Who are LaMonica McIver and Carmen Bucco?

McIver emerged as the Democratic candidate in a crowded field in the July special election. A member of the city council of New Jersey’s biggest city since 2018, she also worked for Montclair Public Schools as a personnel director and plans to focus on affordability, infrastructure, abortion rights and “protecting our democracy,” she told The Associated Press earlier this summer.

Bucco describes himself on his campaign website as a small-business owner influenced by his upbringing in the foster system. He lists support for law enforcement and ending corruption as top issues.

The 10th District lies in a heavily Democratic and majority-Black region of northern New Jersey. Republicans are outnumbered by more than 6 to 1.

It’s been a volatile year for Democrats in New Jersey, where the party dominates state government and the congressional delegation.

Among the developments were the conviction on federal bribery charges of U.S. Sen. Bob Menendez, who has denied the charges, and the demise of the so-called county party line — a system in which local political leaders give their preferred candidates favorable position on the primary ballot.

Democratic Rep. Andy Kim, who’s running for Menendez’s seat, and other Democrats brought a federal lawsuit challenging the practice as part of his campaign to oust Menendez, who has resigned since his conviction.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

Body found near Kentucky shooting site believed to be suspect, officials say

Avatar

Published

on


Body found near Kentucky shooting site believed to be suspect, officials say – CBS News


Watch CBS News



In a news conference Thursday night, Kentucky police said they believe a body found near the site of the Interstate 75 shooting on Sept. 7, 2024, is that of suspect Joseph Couch. Officials said articles on the body indicated it was likely Couch, but that crews were still processing the scene and wouldn’t have final identification until later. CBS News’ Carissa Lawson anchors a special report.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024 Breaking MN

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.