Connect with us

CBS News

Experts warn against vaccine skepticism

Avatar

Published

on


Thanks to all those shots in the arm, in the year 2000, measles in the United States was declared eliminated. But now, it’s coming back, with measles cases reported from California to Vermont.

measles-cases-reported.jpg

CBS News


One big reason: across the country in 2023, more families exempted their children from routine immunizations than ever before.

“There’s never been a better time in human history to tackle an infectious disease than today,” said Dr. Howard Markel, a medical historian, retired from the University of Michigan. “There’s so many things we can do, from vaccines to antivirals to antibiotics. And yet, I am dumbfounded by the volume of anti-vax voices.”

History of vaccine hesitancy

Markel says vaccine hesitancy is as old as the United States. In the 1700s, when smallpox was ravaging the colonies, some people were given an early form of immunization called variolation. “You went to a doctor who had this infectious material – dried pus and detritus of smallpox scars and so on,” Markel said. “They would cut you open, make a slice of your arm, and inoculate – ‘put it in’ – your arm. And half of the people got really sick, and some of them died. So, it cost a lot and it was dangerous.”

But the people who recovered were immune.

Benjamin Franklin decided it was too dangerous for his sickly four-year-old son, Franky. “One of Franklin’s great regrets was that he did not get his son inoculated, instilled with smallpox virus, to prevent what ultimately killed him,” Markel said.

In the 1800s, as a much safer smallpox vaccine was developed, many cities and states started requiring smallpox vaccination. At the University of California at Berkeley in 1902, it was mandatory.

Students were up in arms about it, said professor Elena Conis, a medical historian at Berkeley. “And people in town cheered them on.

In 1905, the Supreme Court ruled the government has the authority to require vaccination. “This, importantly, had the effect of energizing a lot of anti-vaccine groups,” said Conis. “And the anti-vaccine groups at the time believed that they were defenders of individual liberty.”

Victory over polio

But by the 1950s, there was one thing that united Americans: their fear of polio. Markel said, “The idea that your child would be paralyzed or, worse, condemned to an iron lung, this giant tank where your head’s sticking out and that’s how you breathe for the rest of your life, that terrified people.”

Nurse Cares For Polio Patient
An iron lung helps a young boy with polio to breathe, c. 1955.

Kirn Vintage Stock/Corbis via Getty Images


When Dr. Jonas Salk invented the polio vaccine, he was considered a hero. “The greatest faith probably ever in the American medical-industrial complex was around the 1950s,” said Markel. “And here you had this photogenic Jonas Salk with his wife and his children, and they saved the world.”

The 1950s might be considered the high-water mark of vaccine acceptance. Vaccines were then developed for diseases including measles, mumps, and rubella. As Americans, especially children, got their shots, rates for those diseases plummeted.

But it all ran straight into the counterculture decade of the 1960s. Conis said, “As more and more doctors and public health officials were encouraging people to get vaccinated, or encouraging their children to get vaccinated, people were saying, ‘But hold on: I need to ask questions. What are these vaccines for? Who made them? What’s in them? And why are they necessary? Can you tell me that?'”

The overwhelming medical consensus is that the benefits of vaccines have far outweighed the risks. But an upsurge in the anti-vaccine movement was fueled by a 1998 study in the prestigious British journal The Lancet that falsely linked the measles vaccine with autism.

It took 12 years for the journal to retract the study after concluding the research was fraudulent.

Vaccine advocacy, and dissenting voices

Dr. Peter Hotez has worked for decades to develop vaccines at the Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital. “If you asked me 40 years ago would I ever have to be defending vaccines like I do now, I’d say you’re crazy,” he said. “Everybody knows the life-saving impact of vaccination.”

One study estimated that by the end of 2022, the COVID vaccine had saved more than three million American lives. And according to Hotez, “We reached that level of 200,000 Americans needlessly dying because they refused the COVID vaccine.”

Hotez entered the public debate as a passionate advocate for vaccines, and become a bit of a lightning-rod, telling an audience at Northwestern University in Chicago, “I’m worried there’s a full-on frontal assault on biomedical science. … When we talk about anti-vaccine, anti-science movements, we call it misinformation or info-demic, as though it’s just some random junk out there on the internet. And it’s not. I want to convince you today that it’s organized, it’s deliberate, it’s politically motivated, and it’s having a devastating impact.”

With public figures like former presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. vocalizing vaccine skepticism, Hotez believes politics has turbocharged historical reasons for resisting vaccines. 

Asked why somebody would want somebody else not to be vaccinated, Hotez replied, “It’s a form of political control. And it’s a part of creating another issue to galvanize their base.”

Conis was asked if she were concerned about where vaccines are right now in terms of the public: “What I will say is that I’m not at all surprised. We’ve been here, in some respects, before. Vaccination resistance bubbles up when we use more vaccines, and when we use more of the force of law to encourage or require vaccination. When I hear arguments, and when I hear frustration that people aren’t getting vaccinated – how can they not understand? – my response is, ‘Let’s try to understand their distrust, let’s try to understand their concerns, and let’s take them seriously.'”

But as we try to benefit from the lessons of history, Hotez warns the clock is ticking: “The things that we’re talking about today, like COVID-19, H5N1, they’re the warmup acts. You know, Mother Nature’s not being coy with us, right? She’s telling us, ‘I’m going to throw a major pandemic at you every few years, and you better get ready. And by the way, you better convince your population to accept vaccines. Otherwise, the devastation is going to be unprecedented.'”

      
For more info:

     
Story produced by Alan Golds and Amiel Weisfogel. Editor: Remington Korper. 


See also: 


Winning hearts and minds over vaccines

09:50



Read the original article

Leave your vote

CBS News

Man arrested on murder charge 14 years after victim vanished in Virginia

Avatar

Published

on


Police arrested a man on murder charges this month, 14 years after he allegedly killed a man in Virginia, but the victim’s body has never been found. 

Shane Ryan Donahue, a Virginia man, is presumed deceased, the Prince William County Police Department said Tuesday. He was last seen leaving his parents’ home in Nokesville, Virginia, on March 22, 2010. Donahue, 23, was headed to his house in Nokesville, but never made it there. 

Donahue was added to the National Missing and Unidentified Persons System after he vanished. According to records, Donahue did not have a car and regularly got rides from friends. He frequented Washington, D.C., Baltimore, Fauquier County, Virginia, and Northern Virginia.

The case stumped investigators, who followed a number of leads over the years. This spring, detectives reactivated the investigation and started looking at every detail of the case from scratch, officials said. They revisited people who had been interviewed during the initial investigation and reviewed “digital evidence in greater detail due to advances in analytical technology and modern police investigative practices,” according to a news release.

Officers said Donahue was last seen leaving his parents’ home with Timothy Sean Hickerson, now a 43-year-old Florida resident. Investigators connected Hickerson to a burglary at Donahue’s home that happened just days before the Virginia man disappeared. 

Detectives got an arrest warrant this month and, with the help of Florida’s Flagler County Sheriff’s Office, Hickerson was taken into custody in Palm Coast, Florida. Hickerson was charged with murder and burglary, is now set to be extradited to Virginia. 



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

Trump created the controversial $10,000 SALT deduction cap. Now he wants to end it.

Avatar

Published

on


Former President Donald Trump, an avowed proponent of tax cuts, is floating the idea of reversing a measure passed during his tenure in the White House that effectively raised taxes for many U.S. homeowners.

In a post Tuesday on Truth Social, Trump suggested he would scrap a $10,000 cap on deducting state and local taxes (SALT) that was passed as part of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act — a massive revamp that he has said boosted economic growth. 

Now, in the run-up to the November election, Trump said in the post he would “get SALT back, lower your taxes, and so much more,” although he stopped short of offering details. Trump made the post ahead of a speech he’s giving Wednesday at the Nassau Coliseum on Long Island.

Trump’s new proposal for getting rid of his $10,000 SALT deduction cap comes as the presidential hopeful is pitching several additional tax cuts that would, if enacted, reduce taxes for major groups of voters. He’s also vowed to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits, a pledge that could get support from the nation’s senior citizens, as well as to end income taxes on tipped workers and on overtime pay, ideas that would help lower- and middle-income Americans. 

Yet Trump’s reversal on the SALT deduction has sparked skepticism from lawmakers as well as economists and policy experts. 

“So … now Trump is against the SALT tax cap which *checks notes* is a key part of the — only — major piece of legislation passed during his administration?” noted Chris Koski, a political science professor at Reed College in Portland, Oregon, on X.

Rep. Tom Suozzi, a Democrat from Nassau, Queens, said in a statement on Wednesday that he is “happy that the former president is saying that he has finally reversed his devastating decision in 2017 to cap the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction.” He also urged Trump to convince Republican lawmakers to vote to restore the full deduction “if he is truly serious.”

The SALT deduction cap “has been a body blow to my constituents for the past 7 years,” Suozzi added.

Senator Chuck Schumer, a Democrat from New York, wrote on X,”Donald Trump took away your SALT dedications and hurt so many Long Island families. Now, he’s coming to Long Island to pretend he supports SALT. It won’t work.”

Asked for details about Trump’s proposal to restore the SALT writeoff, a spokeswoman for the Trump campaign told CBS MoneyWatch: “While his pro-growth, pro-energy policies will make life affordable again, President Trump is also going to quickly move tax relief for working people and seniors.”

Here’s what to know about the SALT deduction. 

What is the SALT deduction?

The state and local tax deduction allows taxpayers who itemize to deduct property taxes, sales taxes and state or local income taxes from their federal income taxes. Prior to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, there was no limit on how much people could deduct through the SALT deduction. 

But the 2017 tax overhaul passed under Trump limited the deduction to $10,000 – a blow to many homeowners in states with high property taxes, many of which are Democratic leaning. At the time of the law’s passage, the Treasury Department estimated that almost 11 million taxpayers in high-tax states like New York and New Jersey would forfeit $323 billion in deductions.

Who benefits from the SALT deduction?

Homeowners with high property taxes, such as people in New York, New Jersey and California, were the biggest beneficiaries of the the full SALT deduction. 

But some experts also noted that the SALT deduction primarily put more money in the pockets of higher-earning Americans. About 80% of the full SALT deduction had helped people earning more than $100,000 a year, according to the Tax Foundation. 

What happened after Trump capped the SALT deduction at $10,000?

The limit has increasingly impacted middle-class homeowners across the U.S. because of rising property taxes and incomes. Some lawmakers have also sought to either repeal or increase the SALT cap, but none of those efforts have borne fruit. 

Earlier this year, some lawmakers sought to double the SALT deduction cap to $20,000 for married couples, with the change retroactive for the 2023 tax year. But that bill was blocked in the House in February.

Won’t the SALT deduction cap expire anyway?

Yes, the SALT deduction cap is a provision that’s due to expire in 2025, as are many other parts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, such as a reduction of the individual tax brackets. But Trump has previously indicated he wants to extend the provisions in his signature tax law.

How much would it cost the U.S. to repeal the SALT deduction cap?

It won’t be cheap, according to the the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a think tank that focuses on budget and policy issues. 

Eliminating the $10,000 deduction limit “would increase the cost of extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) by $1.2 trillion over a decade,” the group estimates, adding that such a measure would be a “costly mistake.”

Extending the TCJA’s tax cuts would increase the nation’s deficit by $3.9 trillion over the next decade, the group estimates. By adding in a expiration or repeal of the SALT deduction cap, that would grow to $5.1 trillion, it added.

“Lawmakers should not extend the TCJA without a plan to – at a minimum – offset the costs of extension, but ideally the plan would raise revenues relative to current law and help put the nation’s debt on a better trajectory,” the group said in a statement.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

What Kamala Harris told Latinos at Congressional Hispanic Caucus event

Avatar

Published

on


What Kamala Harris told Latinos at Congressional Hispanic Caucus event – CBS News


Watch CBS News



Vice President Kamala Harris courted minorities, immigrants and their families during the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute’s leadership conference in Washington. CBS News senior White House and political correspondent Ed O’Keefe reports.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024 Breaking MN

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.