Connect with us

CBS News

Senate report details Secret Service failures in response to Trump assassination attempt in Butler

Avatar

Published

on


An interim Senate report identifies planning, communications and security failures in the U.S. Secret Service’s advance and security efforts during former President Donald Trump’s July rally that “directly contributed” to the assassination attempt against him. 

The 94-page report, released Wednesday morning, cited nearly half a dozen problems, including lack of a chain of command, poor coordination with state and local law enforcement, inadequate resources and equipment and a failure to effectively secure the site and ensure the safety of the former president at the Butler, Pennsylvania, incident. 

The preliminary findings were part of a joint investigation with the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. 

“Every single one of these actions is directly related to a failure in the U.S. Secret Service’s planning, communications, intelligence sharing and law enforcement coordination efforts,” Chairman Gary Peters told reporters Tuesday ahead of the report’s release. “Every single one of those failures was preventable, and the consequences of those failures were dire.” 

Gunman Thomas Crooks fired eight rounds with an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle from the roof of an adjacent building before he was killed by a countersniper, grazing Trump’s ear, killing one person at the rally and injuring three others in the July 13 shooting. 

The Senate report says several Secret Service officials had chronic problems with their radios. In one instance, a Secret Service countersniper was offered a local radio to help with communications through the day, but he didn’t have time to pick it up because he was working on “fixing” his own Secret Service radio.  Due to failures of radios on site in Butler, the special agent in charge gave away his radio to a lead advance agent and went without one for the rest of the day, according to the Senate report. 

A text message sent by a Secret Service employee to a supervisor an hour before the shooting warned, “I’m not getting good comms on either my phone or radio. I’ll try to stay on[.]”

At the same time, the Secret Service’s drone units had “technical problems” —  so much so, that at 4:33 p.m., the Secret Service employee operating the drone system had to call a toll-free helpline for support. The report notes the agent had only three months of experience working with that equipment and lacked knowledge about it.

The preliminary report also found that Secret Service personnel were notified about a suspicious person with a rangefinder 27 minutes before the shooting, but the lead service agent and other site officials told the panel they did not receive the information. 

Another alert about an individual on the roof of a building was sent by radio from a local law enforcement officer to the Secret Service two minutes before the shooting. This was  followed by another alert that the individual was armed, but the message was “not relayed” to key Secret Service personnel, the report stated. 

“Leaving a roof unattended, just you know, barely over 100 yards from the podium with a direct line of sight was an unacceptable and inexcusable error,” said GOP Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, a ranking member on the committee. “Everybody thought this guy was suspicious and nobody thought to stop the proceeding and remove the former president from the stage.” 

A counter sniper who was interviewed by the panel described seeing local law enforcement running toward the building where Crooks was positioned with guns drawn, but he did not alert Trump’s protective detail because it “did not cross [his] mind” to notify someone to get Trump off the stage.

According to the report, counter sniper teams were dispatched to Butler following “credible intelligence” of a threat, marking the first time this type of team was deployed to a protectee besides the president and vice president. However, nearly all the Secret Service personnel that spoke to the committee said they were unaware of the potential threat. 

“Why am I hearing about threats on TV,” an agent wrote in a note after the shooting that was included in the report.

Members of the Secret Service advance team were also denied additional resources, according to the report, and “could not identify” who had final decision-making authority for the event. 

“It was almost like an ‘Abbott and Costello’ farce with ‘who’s on first’ finger pointing by all of the different actors,” said Connecticut Senator Richard Blunmental, who heads the permanent investigative subcommittee. “It was really truth being stranger than fiction.”

The Secret Service has not commented on the report. Last week the agency issued findings from its own “Mission Assurance Review,” which found multiple communications issues and a lack of “due diligence” by the Secret Service.    

Acting Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe testified before the committee in late July, shortly after the panel launched its investigation. So far, it has completed 12 interviews, reviewed approximately 2,800 documents and conducted a site visit in Butler. Additional interviews are expected in the coming weeks, but committee aides won’t say if the probe could expand to the second assassination attempt this month, which took place at Trump’s Florida  golf club.  

The committee issued several recommendations, including enhancing planning and coordination, communication and expanding intelligence assets and resources. It also suggested designating a “single individual” to approve the agency’s security plans. 

“We’ve put a lot of meat on the bones here but we are a long way from getting the information we need,” said GOP Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, ranking member of the investigative subcommittee. 

contributed to this report.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

How do your views on climate change compare to others in your area? Take this quiz and find out

Avatar

Published

on


Poll: People want Congress to act on climate


Americans want Congress to do more for the climate, poll finds

03:54

About two-thirds of Americans say they are worried about climate change. Nearly 8 in 10 Americans support funding research into renewable energy, and 3 out of 4 support regulating carbon emissions. More than 60% believe Congress should do more to address climate change, according to data from the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.  

Even in Jack County, Texas, where Donald Trump received 90% of the vote in 2020, 58% support regulating carbon emissions. That’s the lowest of any U.S. county. 

Still, climate change remains a deeply polarizing issue within Congress and on the campaign trail

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which the White House called “the most significant climate action in U.S. history,” provided nearly $400 billion for climate solutions. It passed Congress strictly along party lines, with no Republicans voting in favor. 

In 2023, Democrats voted for pro-environmental legislation more than 90% of the time, while Republicans voted for pro-environmental legislation less than 5% of the time, according to voting data collected by the League of Conservation Voters. 

“We see pretty much across the board, at all levels of government, that government officials dramatically underestimate the level of support from their own constituents,” Tony Leiserowitz, the director of the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, told CBS News.

Answer the questions below — which are a selection of the same questions asked by the Yale program’s survey to create their Climate Opinion Maps — to see how your beliefs about climate change compare to others in your area and the nation. 



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

Ice cream shops and pharmacy linked to ruthless Mexico cartel, U.S. Treasury Department says

Avatar

Published

on


The U.S. Treasury Department on Tuesday said it sanctioned two Mexican businesses – an ice cream chain and a local pharmacy – for allegedly using proceeds of fentanyl trafficking to finance their operations tied to the Sinaloa cartel.

The move comes as rival cartel factions have been in a deadly conflict with each other and authorities following the surprise arrest on U.S. soil of Sinaloa Cartel co-founder Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada in late July, which is believed to have unleashed an internal power struggle within the group.

Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control — the U.S. agency that combats illicit funds and money laundering — said people previously cited for money laundering had set up a chain of ice cream and popsicle shops in the state of Sinaloa.

The Sinaloa cartel often uses their earnings from international drug trafficking to establish businesses, pouring cash into everything from fraudulent timeshare operations to restaurants to launder money.

OFAC said that another individual set up a pharmacy and convenience store using drug proceeds in the northern state of Sonora.

“President Biden and Vice President Harris are committed to using every tool at our disposal to combat the cartels that are poisoning our communities with fentanyl and other deadly drugs,” said Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Wally Adeyemo in a statement.

The sanctions come days after the U.S. rejected accusations by Mexico’s President that the U.S. was partly responsible for a surge in cartel warfare that left dozens of people dead in Sinaloa.

MEXICO-MILITARY-CRIME-DRUGS
Soldiers of the Mexican Army patrol the streets of Culiacan, Sinaloa State, Mexico, on September 21, 2024. 

IVAN MEDINA/AFP via Getty Images


The cartel is responsible for a significant portion of fentanyl trafficking into the U.S. They precursor chemicals from China and India to make the synthetic opioid and smuggle it into the United States, where it causes about 70,000 overdose deaths annually.

Jesús Norberto Larrañaga Herrera, known as “El 30”, and Karla Gabriela Lizárraga Sánchez, established “Nieves y Paletas,” an ice cream chain with several storefront locations around the capital using drug proceeds, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.

OFAC said a retail pharmacy and convenience store in Sonora were tied to drug trafficker José Arnoldo Morgan Huerta, nicknamed “Chachio.” His brother, Juan Carlos Morgan Huerta, known as “Cacayo,” is a Sinaloa cartel “plaza boss” and oversees drug trafficking in the border city of Nogales.

“Today’s action is part of a whole-of-government effort to counter the global threat posed by the trafficking of illicit drugs into the United States that is causing the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans annually, as well as countless more non-fatal overdoses,” the U.S. Treasury Department said in the statement.

Separately, the Treasury Department also announced Tuesday it was sanctioning five leaders of Colombia’s Clan del Golfo (CDG), a top drug trafficking network. 

The Gulf Clan “is one of the country’s largest drug trafficking organizations and a key contributor to human smuggling through the Darién Gap,” officials said in a statement.

In July, U.S. President Joe Biden announced a series of proposals aimed at curbing the ongoing drug epidemic. These include a push on Congress to pass legislation to establish a pill press and tableting machine registry and enhance penalties against convicted drug smugglers and traffickers of fentanyl.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

House to vote on 3-month funding extension to avoid government shutdown

Avatar

Published

on


Washington — The House is set to vote Wednesday on a stopgap measure to keep the government funded for three months, after Speaker Mike Johnson embraced a clean temporary funding measure that will need support from Democrats to pass. 

Last week, the House rejected Johnson’s initial funding plan, which would have kept the government funded for around six months and was paired with a noncitizen voting measure that Democrats viewed as a nonstarter. After the setback, which was driven in part by his own party, the speaker said he would opt to bring up a vote on a measure to extend funding through Dec. 20 without the voting proposal, rather than risk a government shutdown weeks ahead of Election Day. 

Then on Monday, Johnson was delivered another setback when the stopgap measure failed to secure enough support on the House Rules Committee, forcing House leadership to bring up the funding bill for a floor vote under suspension of the rules — a process that requires support from two-thirds of the chamber for passage.

Johnson said on Tuesday that he expects the continuing resolution to “pass by a wide margin,” while making clear that he thought “the best play under the circumstances was the CR with the SAVE Act,” referring to the voting measure.

“This was our opportunity to both vote to fund the government and ensure the security of the election, but we came a little short of the goal line,” Johnson said. “So we have to go with the last available play.”

The speaker called the legislation a “very narrow, bare bones” temporary measure. And while he noted that “we loathe [continuing resolutions] as much as anyone,” he said “it would be political malpractice to shut the government down.”

The government funding vote

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speaks during a news conference after a House Republican Caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 24, 2024, in Washington, D.C.
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson speaks during a news conference after a House Republican Caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 24, 2024, in Washington, D.C.

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images


The vote on the funding measure Wednesday could draw more support from Democrats than Republicans, given conservative opposition to the continuing resolution. The same dynamic has occurred in recent funding disputes, putting House Republican leadership in an uncomfortable position with their conference.

House Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar said on Tuesday that with Johnson’s move to proceed with the vote, the belief is “he has the Republicans to pass the bill,” adding that Democrats will “work in a bipartisan way to make sure that this gets done.”

The House is set to depart for a lengthy recess following the vote to keep the government funded, and won’t return until after the Nov. 5 election. And with the three-month funding measure, they’ll face a pre-holiday deadline to prevent a shutdown after their return. House Republicans have fretted about the outcome, which Congress frequently falls back upon. But Johnson said on Tuesday that House leadership opposes an omnibus funding package around the holidays.

“I have no intention of going back to that terrible tradition,” Johnson said, suggesting that he would push to approve the 12 full-year spending bills after the election. 

The Senate will also need to act to prevent a shutdown ahead of the Oct. 1 deadline, assuming the House bill passes. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer encouraged the House to approve the continuing resolution “quickly,” saying on Tuesday afternoon that “time is of the essence.” He outlined that the Senate will move swiftly on the stopgap measure once it passes the lower chamber to avert the shutdown threat. 

“If we work together, stay away from poison pills and partisanship, we can avoid a government shutdown,” Schumer said. 



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024 Breaking MN

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.