Connect with us

CBS News

Trump vows to “take other countries’ jobs” in economic speech, pitching ideas from his presidency

Avatar

Published

on


Savannah, Georgia — Former President Donald Trump on Tuesday spoke about his manufacturing agenda and announced incentives to bring manufacturing jobs back to the U.S., several of which he implemented as president and had mixed results. 

Speaking in Savannah, home of one of the busiest ports in the U.S., Trump promised, “Georgia and Savannah are going to be right in the center of the action. We’re going to rebuild our manufacturing, and it’s going to happen fast and beautifully.” 

The economy is one of the top issues for voters nationwide and in the battleground state of Georgia, and Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris have offered some targeted economic proposals. Harris plans to announce more details about her plans for the economy Wednesday. 

Trump said U.S. companies would get expanded research and development tax credits, which was part of the 2017 tax cut enacted during his presidency.

“You’ll be able to write off 100% of the cost of heavy machinery and other equipment in the first year and full expensing for new manufacturing investments,” Trump said of his plan. 

Former President Donald Trump Delivers Remarks On The Economy In Savannah, Georgia
Republican Presidential candidate former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to attendees during a campaign rally at the Johnny Mercer Theatre on September 24, 2024 in Savannah, Georgia. 

BRANDON BELL / Getty Images


This proposal, known as 100% bonus expensing, is something that was enacted as part of the R&D tax credits.  It enables businesses to write off 100% of the cost of a machinery or equipment investment in the first year, rather than amortizing it over a five-year period. 

The former president also claimed his administration would “take other countries’ jobs” with the economic incentives he is offering.

“We’re going to take their factories,” Trump said Tuesday. “We’re going to bring thousands and thousands of businesses and trillions of dollars in wealth back to the good old USA.” 

“Under the plan, American workers will no longer be worried about losing your jobs to foreign nations,” he said. “Instead, foreign nations will be worried about losing their jobs to America.”

Trump said he would put a “100% tariff” on cars coming from Mexico. Several major automakers  — including General Motors, Ford, Nissan, Volkswagen and Toyota — have manufacturing facilities in Mexico, and tariffs in general are unpopular among Republicans. His former adviser Gary Cohn said on “Face the Nation” earlier this month that while tariffs are an “important instrument” for a president, they could lead to inflation.  

A number of Republicans do not share Trump’s enthusiasm for tariffs, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who said Tuesday he’s “not a fan of tariffs.”

 As president, Trump imposed a range of tariffs on foreign goods, including solar panels, washing machines, apparel, and steel and aluminum, arguing that they’d help safeguard U.S. jobs. But many economists said this surge in protectionism triggered retaliation from China, heightened tensions with other key trading partners and increased uncertainty in trade policy, dampening U.S. growth. 

A study this year by some of the world’s top economists evaluated the impact of Trump’s 2018-2019 tariffs and whether they restored jobs to the U.S. and won support from voters. It found that the net effect of the import and retaliatory tariffs in the areas that were affected by the trade war “was at best a wash, and it may have been mildly negative.” 

The report said that the import tariffs “had either insignificantly negative or insignificantly positive employment effects,” and the retaliatory tariffs “had a consistent and significant negative employment impact.” However, the trade war succeeded in “strengthening support” for the GOP, the study said, finding that those who lived in the target-protected areas “became less likely to identify as Democrats and more likely to vote for President Trump.” 

Trump also touted his pitch to lower the corporate tax rate from 21% – which was cemented as law under Trump’s 2017 tax plan – to 15% to incentivize companies to manufacture in the U.S. 

As part of an effort to entice U.S. companies to bring their production back to the states, Trump is proposing creating “special zones” on federal land that would be designated for American companies and feature lower taxes and regulations, but he offered no details about this plan. 

In an olive branch to Georgia’s Republican Gov. Brian Kemp, who Trump previously called a “bad guy” and whom he campaigned against in 2022, Trump praised Kemp as “fantastic” and thanked Kemp “for his great support.” In 2020, Trump became the first Republican to lose Georgia in a presidential race since 1992, and he later placed a call to Kemp asking him to convene a special session of the Georgia legislature to overturn the election results, which Kemp refused. 

But tensions between the two had already been easing. Before Trump last visited Georgia in early August, he offered to work with Kemp to deepen the port of Savannah. Although the port of Savannah is still one of the largest ports in the country, the city had been in a period of decline before a revitalization push from the Savannah College of Art and Design and tourism toward the end of the 20th century. 

“We’ll work with your governor, and we’re going to get that done very quickly,” Trump said Tuesday. 

Trump also thanked Kemp for his support even though the Georgia governor was campaigning in Pennsylvania with Senate candidate Dave McCormick. 

This is Trump’s sixth visit to Georgia during the 2024 presidential campaign cycle, one of the most contentious battleground states.

CBS News polling shows the race in Georgia between Trump and Harris is a toss up



Read the original article

Leave your vote

CBS News

Gov. Newsom signs law to shed light on state storage of newborn DNA, prompted by 10-year CBS News California investigation

Avatar

Published

on


Amended bill allows California to continue to conceal who is using newborn DNA for research — and why.


Bills to shed light on newborn DNA storage in California quietly killed or gutted

03:22

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill (SB 1099) Wednesday prompted by a decade-long CBS News California investigation into California’s newborn genetic biobank. 

We still won’t know who is using your DNA for research, or what the research is for, but the California Department of Public Health must now reveal the number of newborn DNA samples that California is storing and the number of DNA samples that the state sells to researchers each year. 

California has stored blood spots from every baby born in the state since the 1980s. Researchers and law enforcement can use those DNA samples without your knowledge or consent. 

If you’re related to someone who was born in California since 1983, a portion of your DNA is likely in the state’s massive Newborn Genetic Biobank. In response to our decade-long investigation, lawmakers introduced several bills this year that were intended to shed light on how the state is amassing and using California’s newborn DNA stockpile.

SB 1099 was the only bill to survive the legislative session. 

While privacy advocates say it is a step in the right direction, recent amendments raise new questions about the appearance of state secrecy.

The initial bill was heavily amended to remove the requirements for the state to reveal which researchers are purchasing the DNA and what they are using it for.

Privacy advocates plan to try again next year.

See our continuing coverage on newborn blood spot privacy concerns here.

Learn more about newborn bloodspot storage and how to opt out of storage or research here.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

Special counsel files critical brief in Trump’s D.C. case, but it remains under seal

Avatar

Published

on


Washington — Special counsel Jack Smith has filed what is expected to be a key legal brief in the federal case against former President Donald Trump related to the 2020 presidential election, but kept it under wraps as the judge weighs the next steps.

Smith’s filing, which prosecutors said would run up to 180 pages, is expected to provide the most comprehensive look at the evidence federal prosecutors have compiled in their case against Trump, which was upended by the Supreme Court’s landmark decision on presidential immunity. The filing was submitted to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Thursday. The court set a deadline of 5 p.m. for the filing.

“We have complied with the court’s order,” the special counsel’s office said in a statement.

The former president pleaded not guilty to four counts arising from what the special counsel alleges was an unlawful scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election to hold on to power for four more years.

The filing, as well as any accompanying exhibits, could give the public its most substantial window into the special counsel’s investigation into Trump’s alleged efforts to subvert the transfer of power, if the document or portions of it are made available. It contains a “substantial amount” of sensitive information, such as recordings, transcripts and reports of witness testimony that typically is kept secret, Smith’s team said in a separate filing.

Smith’s team filed the document under seal, meaning it was not released publicly. Whether the submission is made available — and when — will be up to U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is presiding over the case. 

Trump’s 2020 election case

Smith initially brought charges against Trump in August 2023, but a federal grand jury returned a new indictment narrowing the allegations last month after the Supreme Court ruled that the former president is absolutely immune from prosecution for official actions taken while in the White House.

The decision has led to additional proceedings before Chutkan, who must now consider whether the newly alleged conduct can give way to criminal charges in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

Federal prosecutors have argued the new indictment adheres to the high court’s decision and stressed that Trump was acting as a candidate seeking the presidency rather than the office-holder. Among the allegations that Smith and his team have made is that the former president enlisted Vice President Mike Pence to unilaterally reject state electoral votes during a joint session of Congress on Jan. 6, 2021, which he presided over in a ceremonial role as president of the Senate. 

But Trump’s lawyers have asserted that those communications with Pence are subject to immunity and therefore cannot be used in the case against him. They have indicated that they will seek to have the entire indictment tossed out on those and other grounds.

The two sides appeared before Chutkan earlier this month for their first meeting since the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling to hash out a schedule for how the case should move forward. While Trump’s lawyers had proposed a series of deadlines that would push proceedings into 2025, the judge adopted a schedule that sees most filings submitted before the November election.

The path Chutkan laid out means the public could learn more about Smith’s case against the former president, and the evidence he has amassed, before Election Day. Trump is vying for a second term in the White House and is locked in a tight race with Vice President Kamala Harris, with the election now less than six weeks away.

If Trump wins, he could order the Justice Department to seek to drop the charges against him.

Lawyers for the former president have argued that evidence gathered by the special counsel and his team should not be made public before the election and raised concerns to Chutkan about potentially damaging information coming to light as voters begin casting ballots.

The judge, though, has made clear that the upcoming election will not factor into her decision-making, though she said earlier this month that setting a trial date would be an “exercise in futility.”

Any decision Chutkan makes about whether the conduct alleged in the new indictment is covered by presidential immunity will likely be appealed up to the Supreme Court. 

In the opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, the conservative majority laid out three categories of presidential acts and corresponding levels of immunity. Actions taken within a president’s exclusive constitutional authority are entitled to absolute immunity, official acts are entitled to the presumption of immunity and unofficial acts are not entitled to immunity at all.

The Supreme Court wiped away one aspect of the indictment under its new standard, finding that Trump is shielded from criminal charges for alleged conduct involving his discussions with Justice Department officials. But they left it to the district court to determine whether a prosecution involving the rest of Trump’s alleged actions, including the efforts to influence Pence’s oversight of Congress’ certification of electoral votes, is allowed.

Chutkan said in a filing earlier this week that she is conducting a “close” and “fact specific” analysis of the indictment’s allegations, as directed by the Supreme Court.

contributed to this report.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

Kamala Harris, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy address reporters

Avatar

Published

on


Kamala Harris, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy address reporters – CBS News


Watch CBS News



Vice President Kamala Harris and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy delivered remarks Thursday after President Biden announced more than $8 billion in military aid to Ukraine.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024 Breaking MN

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.