CBS News
How Vladimir Kara-Murza won a Pulitzer Prize from a Russian prison
When Russian dissident Vladimir Kara-Murza was sent to prison for speaking out against the Kremlin, it was noteworthy that he continued to criticize Vladimir Putin from behind bars, even to the point of winning a Pulitzer Prize for his essays. What is even more remarkable is that the Russians let him correspond with the outside world.
“I was already in there. I mean, that was the goal,” Kara-Murza told correspondent Scott Pelley in an interview for 60 Minutes. “I was in solitary confinement in a strict regime prison in Siberia with a 25-year sentence. What else could they have done to me?”
Kara-Murza was released from prison in August as part of the prisoner exchange with Russia that was negotiated by the Biden administration and its allies. He had been arrested in April 2022 for publicly criticizing Russia’s war in Ukraine and held in solitary confinement in Siberia since his conviction a year later.
Long critical of Putin, Kara-Murza twice survived being poisoned by suspected agents of the Kremlin.
Prior to his arrest, Kara-Murza had contributed columns to The Washington Post, and he continued to write them throughout his time in the Russian penitentiary system. His prison essays included headlines such as “Russians are living in a frightening, distorted reality” and “Vladimir Putin’s war on Ukraine makes a mockery of law.”
Although his public criticism of Putin and the war in Ukraine had earned him a conviction for treason, Kara-Murza said writing behind bars has long been a tradition for Russian political prisoners.
“Many of them actually wrote some of their most significant pieces of work while they were in prison,” he said.
He explained to Pelley how he was able to get his writing out. It began, he said, with an electronic letter system, through which his friends and family would write to him. Guards would then print out those correspondences, along with a few sheets of blank paper for a written reply.
Kara-Murza said his wife, Evgenia, frequently wrote to him and attached the maximum allowed number of blank sheets, which he used to write his columns longhand. He would give his writings back to prison officials, who would then send them through the censorship system before they were electronically delivered back to Evgenia.
Kara-Murza said very little was ever censored. He noted that, at times, he preemptively edited his own words in order to clear the censorship system, knowing his wife would figure out what he really meant.
“She knew exactly what I was actually saying,” Kara-Murza said. “And so, she would just replace a word to make it the one that I was actually meaning to write but couldn’t because of prison censorship. And every time she got it exactly right.”
Kara-Murza in May was awarded a Pulitzer Prize for the “passionate columns” he authored “under great personal risk,” and which included striking datelines such as “PRE-TRIAL DETENTION CENTER NO. 5” and “PRISON COLONY NO. 6.”
Whether he was awaiting his fate in a Moscow cell or being held in solitary confinement in Siberia, Kara-Murza told us no one in the Russian prison system ever prevented him from writing.
“I think for the regime and the Kremlin, what is most important is to punish their opponents, to punish them physically, to isolate them from their families, not to allow them to speak to their children, to send them away into Siberia, to keep them locked up, which is what they did to us,” Kara-Murza said. “What we wrote in letters, I don’t think they cared much about.”
The video above was produced by Brit McCandless Farmer and edited by Scott Rosann.
CBS News
Former Trump national security adviser says next couple months are “really critical” for Ukraine
Washington — Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster, a former national security adviser to Donald Trump, said Sunday that the upcoming months will be “really critical” in determining the “next phase” of the war in Ukraine as the president-elect is expected to work to force a negotiated settlement when he enters office.
McMaster, a CBS News contributor, said on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” that Russia and Ukraine are both incentivized to make “as many gains on the battlefield as they can before the new Trump administration comes in” as the two countries seek leverage in negotiations.
With an eye toward strengthening Ukraine’s standing before President-elect Donald Trump returns to office in the new year, the Biden administration agreed in recent days to provide anti-personnel land mines for use, while lifting restrictions on Ukraine’s use of U.S.-made longer range missiles to strike within Russian territory. The moves come as Ukraine marked more than 1,000 days since Russia’s invasion in February 2022.
Meanwhile, many of Trump’s key selection for top posts in his administration — Rep. Mike Waltz for national security adviser and Sens. Marco Rubio for secretary of state and JD Vance for Vice President — haven’t been supportive of providing continued assistance to Ukraine, or have advocated for a negotiated end to the war.
McMaster said the dynamic is “a real problem” and delivers a “psychological blow to the Ukrainians.”
“Ukrainians are struggling to generate the manpower that they need and to sustain their defensive efforts, and it’s important that they get the weapons they need and the training that they need, but also they have to have the confidence that they can prevail,” he said. “And any sort of messages that we might reduce our aid are quite damaging to them from a moral perspective.”
McMaster said he’s hopeful that Trump’s picks, and the president-elect himself, will “begin to see the quite obvious connections between the war in Ukraine and this axis of aggressors that are doing everything they can to tear down the existing international order.” He cited the North Korean soldiers fighting on European soil in the first major war in Europe since World War II, the efforts China is taking to “sustain Russia’s war-making machine,” and the drones and missiles Iran has provided as part of the broader picture.
“So I think what’s happened is so many people have taken such a myopic view of Ukraine, and they’ve misunderstood Putin’s intentions and how consequential the war is to our interests across the world,” McMaster said.
On Trump’s selections for top national security and defense posts, McMaster stressed the importance of the Senate’s advice and consent role in making sure “the best people are in those positions.”
McMaster outlined that based on his experience, Trump listens to advice and learns from those around him. And he argued that the nominees for director of national intelligence and defense secretary should be asked key questions like how they will “reconcile peace through strength,” and what they think “motivates, drives and constrains” Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Trump has tapped former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard to be director of national intelligence, who has been criticized for her views on Russia and other U.S. adversaries. McMaster said Sunday that Gabbard has a “fundamental misunderstanding” about what motivates Putin.
More broadly, McMaster said he “can’t understand” the Republicans who “tend to parrot Vladimir Putin’s talking points,” saying “they’ve got to disabuse themselves of this strange affection for Vladimir Putin.”
Meanwhile, when asked about Trump’s recent selection of Sebastian Gorka as senior director for counterterrorism and deputy assistant to the president, McMaster said he doesn’t think Gorka is a good person to advise the president-elect on national security. But he noted that “the president, others who are working with him, will probably determine that pretty quickly.”
CBS News
Sen. Van Hollen says Biden is “not fully complying with American law” on Israeli arms shipments
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
CBS News
Rep.-elect Sarah McBride says “I didn’t run” for Congrees “to talk about what bathroom I use”
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.