Connect with us

CBS News

Trump and allies mischaracterize data on immigrants with criminal convictions. Here’s context on what the numbers actually show.

Avatar

Published

on


In recent days, former President Donald Trump and his allies have cited recently released data on immigrants with criminal convictions to claim that the Biden administration has allowed tens of thousands of criminals into the U.S., including thousands of murderers and sexual offenders.

“Kamala should immediately cancel her News Conference because it was just revealed that 13,000 convicted murderers entered our Country during her three and a half year period as Border Czar,” Trump wrote in a social media post Friday. “Also currently in our Country because of her are 15,811 migrants convicted of rape and sexual assault.”

Trump was presumably citing a letter U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement recently shared with Texas Republican Rep. Tony Gonzales. The letter, which Gonzalez published on Friday, contained figures on immigrants with criminal records being tracked by ICE but not detained by the agency. Trump and right-wing figures have mischaracterized the data by claiming that everyone on the list entered under the Biden administration and remains freely in the U.S.

The bottom line is that many of the convicted criminals described in the letter have been in the U.S. for a long time, before the Biden administration took office, according to government data and officials. Some are still in federal or state custody serving criminal sentences and are likely to be arrested by ICE. And others cannot be deported because their home countries won’t take them back or they received legal relief from deportation in immigration court.

What does the data actually show?

The letter ICE sent to Gonzales broke down the number of immigrants with criminal convictions or charges in the agency’s “non-detained docket.”

ICE detains immigrants who are deportable because they are in the U.S. illegally, after crossing a border unlawfully or overstaying a visa, or because they lost their legal right to be in the country after being convicted of certain crimes. Under U.S. law, this can happen to green card holders and other legal immigrants who commit certain crimes.

Detainees talk on telephones at the Adelanto ICE Processing Center in Adelanto, California, on Aug. 28, 2019.
Detainees talk on telephones at the Adelanto ICE Processing Center in Adelanto, California, on Aug. 28, 2019.

Chris Carlson / AP


While the agency runs detention facilities to hold immigrants awaiting deportation, ICE also oversees a “non-detained docket” to monitor the cases of immigrants who are facing deportation proceedings before an immigration judge, without being detained by the agency.

The number of non-detained docket cases has ballooned under the Biden administration, fueled by the release of millions of migrants from the U.S.-Mexico border in recent years. ICE is currently tracking roughly 7.7 million non-detained cases, up from 3.3 million in fiscal year 2020, according to agency data provided by a U.S. official. The agency has 41,000 detention beds funded by Congress — not nearly enough to detain everyone facing removal proceedings.

The letter to Gonzales shows that out of millions of cases, ICE’s non-detained docket includes 425,000 immigrants with criminal convictions and 222,000 with pending criminal charges. The list includes 13,099 immigrants convicted of homicide and 15,811 convicted of sexual assault.

Not every person arrived under Biden

Not every immigrant with a criminal record on ICE’s non-detained docket arrived in the U.S. under President Biden’s tenure. In fact, official figures indicate many of them have been here for years — if not decades.

In June 2021, just several months into the Biden administration, there were 405,786 convicted criminals in ICE’s non-detained docket, according to agency data. In August 2016, during the Obama administration, there were 368,574 convicted criminals in ICE’s non-detained docket, according to data published by the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General.

“The data goes back decades; it includes individuals who entered the country over the past 40 years or more, the vast majority of whose custody determination was made long before this Administration,” DHS spokesperson Luis Miranda said in a statement to CBS News.

Some remain incarcerated in federal or local facilities

While they’re not in ICE’s custody, many of the convicted criminals or criminal suspects in the agency’s non-detained docket are still incarcerated in federal, state or local custody serving their criminal sentences or awaiting trial, U.S. officials told CBS News. But since ICE is tracking their cases, they are technically part of its non-detained docket. 

The docket “includes many who are under the jurisdiction or currently incarcerated by federal, state or local law enforcement partners,” said Miranda, the DHS spokesperson.

ICE expects to arrest, detain and deport those convicted of serious crimes once they finish their criminal sentences, a U.S. official said. Those immigrants have long been considered a priority for arrest by ICE, including under Biden administration policy, which instructs the agency to focus their efforts on detaining public safety threats, national security risks and recent border crossers. 

That being said, ICE efforts to arrest immigrants accused or convicted of crimes are often frustrated by jurisdictions with so-called “sanctuary” policies that limit local law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Some communities, for example, do not honor requests from ICE to hold individuals longer so the agency can pick them up and take them into custody.

Others cannot be deported

Some immigrants with criminal records are able to remain in the U.S. due to diplomatic or legal reasons.

Certain countries, like China, Cuba and Venezuela, limit or outright reject the return of their citizens from the U.S. and the Supreme Court has largely banned indefinite detention in these cases through a 2001 ruling. That means that ICE sometimes has to release immigrants who have been ordered deported by a judge, often because of a criminal conviction, simply because their home country won’t accept them.

Additionally, some immigrants, even those convicted of serious crimes, can have their deportation deferred if immigration judges determine they would likely be tortured or persecuted in their home countries. That’s because the U.S. has binding legal obligations to offer protection to certain foreigners under the United Nations Convention Against Torture and the United Nations Refugee Protocol, which is implemented through a little-known benefit known as withholding of removal.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

Port workers at East and Gulf Coast terminals steam toward a strike for the first time since 1977

Avatar

Published

on


U.S. ports along the East and Gulf Coasts are set to close on Tuesday, with the union representing tens of thousands of dockworkers and an industry group representing port operators and shipping companies at loggerheads over a new labor contract. 

Experts warn that prolonged work stoppage could lead to higher costs on goods around the nation and create shortages ahead of the holiday shopping season. A one-week strike could cost the economy nearly $3.8 billion and increase the cost of consumer goods, according to the Conference Board, which called the situation a “political minefield” given that it comes just ahead of the November presidential election.

Other estimates of the potential economic hit also suggest the strike could take a toll, although the losses would likely amount to a small fraction of the nearly $29 trillion U.S. economy.

“A port strike could cost the U.S. economy billions of dollars a day, hurting American businesses, workers and consumers across the country,” Business Roundtable CEO Joshua Bolten said in a statement this weekend. “We urge both sides to come to an agreement before Monday night’s deadline.”   

Such a breakthrough seemed unlikely as of late Monday afternoon.


How port strikes could impact America’s supply chain

03:21

The contract between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX), which represents the ports and ocean carriers, expires at midnight Monday. A strike is set to officially kick off as of 12:01 Eastern Time on Tuesday, according to the ILA.

The two sides haven’t been at the bargaining table since June, and as of Monday afternoon there was little sign that they were set to resume talks. 

A total of 14 ports involving some 25,000 workers could be affected by the strike, according to USMX: Baltimore; Boston; Charleston, South Carolina; Jacksonville, Florida; Miami; Houston; Mobile, Alabama; New Orleans; New York/New Jersey; Norfolk, Virginia; Philadelphia; Savannah, Georgia; Tampa, Florida; and Wilmington, Delaware.

The ILA is demanding sizable wage hikes and a complete ban on the use of automated cranes, gates and container-moving trucks in unloading or loading freight at ports handling about half of the country’s ship cargo. 

“The ocean carriers represented by USMX want to enjoy rich billion-dollar profits that they are making in 2024, while they offer ILA longshore workers an unacceptable wage package that we reject,” the union said in a statement on Monday.

USMX did not immediately return a request for comment.  

If a strike were deemed to threaten national health or safety, under the Taft-Hartley Act President Joe Biden could seek a court order requiring an 80-day cooling-off period. But Biden administration officials have repeatedly said he would not take to action to prevent a strike and that the contract dispute should be resolved through collective bargaining.

“Senior officials have been in touch with USMX representatives urging them to come to a fair agreement fairly and quickly — one that reflects the success of the companies. Senior officials have also been in touch with the ILA to deliver the same message,” White House spokesperson Robyn Patterson said.


How the port strike is impacting produce | Lunch Break with Michael Marks

03:25

With the first strike by the ILA at East and Gulf Coast cargo terminals since 1977 seemingly imminent, officials in New York and New Jersey have been working to minimize any potential supply-chain disruptions, setting up trucks to transport food and medical supplies. 

Fuels like home heating oil and diesel gas are transported in ways that wouldn’t be impacted by a strike, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said in a news conference on Monday, although she noted that the “potential for disruption is significant.”

New York does not expect shortages of essential goods anytime soon, so there’s no need to run to the grocery store and stockpile goods as occurred during the pandemic, Hochul said. Although there might be shortages of individual food items. such as bananas, should a strike persist longer than a few weeks, the state would continue to get food shipments from major markets including Canada, California and Mexico, as well as from New York itself, the governor added.

The automobile industry could feel a more immediate impact, however, with Hochul cautioning would-be buyers to call ahead.

“If you’re expecting a new car this week, it may be something you want to check with your dealer. It may not be arriving, for example, in the next few weeks,” she warned. 



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

What’s at stake for JD Vance, Tim Walz debate?

Avatar

Published

on


What’s at stake for JD Vance, Tim Walz debate? – CBS News


Watch CBS News



Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Ohio Sen. JD Vance will debate Tuesday as the presidential election looms weeks away. CBS News senior White House and political correspondent Ed O’Keefe breaks down what’s at stake for the Trump and Harris campaigns.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

How Russia, Ukraine use drones for war

Avatar

Published

on


How Russia, Ukraine use drones for war – CBS News


Watch CBS News



Russia and Ukraine have been ramping up the use of drones since the war began more than two years ago. Ben Solomon, a senior video correspondent for the Wall Street Journal, joins CBS News with more on the evolution of drone use in the conflict.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024 Breaking MN

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.