Connect with us

CBS News

Hurricane Helene conspiracy theories about lithium mining, weather control spread widely

Avatar

Published

on


In the wake of Hurricane Helene, false rumors about the federal response have spread rapidly on social media. More extreme conspiracy theories have also taken root, including claims that politicians manipulated the weather to target Republican areas and that the government is trying to seize land in North Carolina to mine lithium. 

The false claims have been amplified by high-profile politicians and social media influencers with large followings. Despite gaining millions of views online, these claims have been debunked by officials and experts, who stress that the government response remains focused on recovery efforts in the hardest-hit regions. Here are two fact checks about the main claims. 

False claim: The government controlled the weather to make Helene hit Republican areas

The false claim that the government controlled the weather to manipulate Helene’s path to hit majority Republican areas has racked up millions of views on social media.

Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene posted on X , saying: “Yes they can control the weather. It’s ridiculous for anyone to lie and say it can’t be done.” The post, which had more than 40 million views at the time of writing, was also debunked via a Community Note on X. 

Greene also posted what she described as a map of areas affected by Helene – in states including Florida, Georgia and the Carolinas – with an overlay showing the area is home to a majority of Republican voters. 

Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones also amplified the claim, saying “Bottom line the federal government could have killed the storm in the Gulf of Mexico.” Both Greene and Jones pointed to cloud seeding as evidence that the government controlled Hurricane Helene. 

Cloud seeding is a type of weather modification that can improve a cloud’s ability to create rain or snow, according to the Nevada-based Desert Research Institute, which has its own cloud seeding program. Cloud seeding has existed since the 1940s, and dozens of countries have weather modification programs.

Hurricane modification through cloud seeding was explored in the years between 1962 and 1983, but the project ended after seeding was found to be ineffective compared to the natural forces of the hurricane, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Conspiracies around cloud seeding routinely appear after major weather events, including flooding in Dubai and storms in California. When asked if cloud seeding played a role in the Dubai floods, a meteorologist told the Associated Press “…when it comes to controlling individual rain storms, we are not anywhere close to that.” 

False claim: The government is seizing land in a North Carolina town to allow lithium mining

False claims that authorities are trying to seize Chimney Rock, North Carolina, to commandeer a lithium mine have spread on social media platforms like X, TikTok and Facebook

Some of the rumors cite an alleged “town meeting” where officials said they would bulldoze Chimney Rock and the government would own the land. One post on X spreading the false claim garnered more than 6 million views.

Rutherford County Emergency Management said claims of a government seizure of Chimney Rock “are entirely false,” adding that no “special meeting” was held to discuss seizing the town. Rutherford County Emergency Management clarified that North Carolina lawmakers met with local officials to request federal and state support. 

Some social media users spreading the claim referenced the North Carolina city of Kings Mountain, where a lithium mine is projected to reopen. Others reference specific companies like Piedmont Lithium, which aims to build a lithium mine in Gaston County, North Carolina. 

These proposed lithium mines are located about 80 to 100 miles away from Chimney Rock. 

Local officials are actively working to reconstruct damaged infrastructure in the town. Chimney Rock has posted updates online about its recovery efforts, including rebuilding Main Street, restoring power and clearing debris. 

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) said in its new “Rumor Response” page that the agency cannot seize a resident’s property or land. 

Federal and state officials have said misinformation and conspiracy theories are hindering efforts to provide aid and accurate information to victims. 

Deanne Criswell, who leads FEMA, said the false claims are “demoralizing” to aid workers, while Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina told “Face the Nation” on Sunday that the claims distract from rescue work. 





Read the original article

Leave your vote

CBS News

Your friend loves a candidate you hate. Can your relationship survive?

Avatar

Published

on


With Election Day around the corner, political divides grow deeper and relationships with certain friends and family members may feel increasingly strained. It leaves some wondering whether to sever ties over fundamental differences in political views.

While it’s been debated for a few elections cycles, experts say the question weighs even more heavily this year. 

Dr. Judy Ho, a clinical and forensic neuropsychologist and author of “The New Rules of Attachment,” has seen this dilemma ramp up recently in both her personal and professional life.

“If you encounter enough people, there’s going to be somebody who’s not the same as your views, and some people just get so much more fired up about it, and then it becomes extremely personal really quickly,” she told CBS News. 

The issue has even made celeb-studded headlines, with social media users dissecting the friendship between Taylor Swift, who made waves by endorsing Kamala Harris, and Brittany Mahomes, who Donald Trump praised last month for “defending” him.

Can you remain friends with people who hold political views antithetical to your own? Experts say there are a few things to consider when it comes to navigating political divides among loved ones. 

Why political differences cause problems

“Political divides are really problematic for relationships because they’re often deeply intertwined with people’s identities and core values,” Ho said. “When the beliefs are challenged, then it feels like a much more personal attack, and it triggers a defensive reaction.”

She said some research shows that when people encounter statements that contradict their deeply held beliefs, their brains react similarly to facing a physical threat.

“It puts them into a fight or flight stance, and that makes conversation impossible, because when you’re in fight or flight, you’re not going to have any kind of productive conversation,” she said. 

That’s why we tend to see disagreements that lead to unfriending someone occur more often around social views, and less around something like economic policy, said Dr. Laura Vogel, psychologist and director of mental health services at Momentous Institute.

“Particularly around those social views, that’s where it begins to connect to my identity as a person, who I am, what my faith is, those sorts of things,” she said. 

How to decide if your friendship has a future

So, how do you know when it’s time to take a step back — or completely away — from a friend or family member over these disagreements?

First, assess the relationship, experts advise.

Think about how much value this person adds to your life, Ho suggests, and also consider the logistics of whether if you’re going to see this person all the time at work or if they’re part of your family.

“Is it going to be really that feasible to just completely cut them off?” Ho said. “If a person is of value to you in some way, is important to you, then it’s important to try to work through the conflict instead of just completely shutting it out or completely never speaking to them about anything related to their beliefs.”

Vogel also suggests slowing down and thinking, “If I unfriend them, what impact will this have on me?” 

“When we are flooded with emotion, whether that’s shock or anger or shame, none of us make really good, thoughtful decisions,” she said. “Let that emotion settle and really reflect … and then make a decision. And I can’t tell anybody what that is, everyone’s going to have a different range of what is best for you.”

If you want to move forward with this person in your life, the next step may include having a conversation with them to better understand their views or to set certain boundaries. 

“If this is an important relationship, that’s where we want to really slow down and resist that temptation to make a snap decision, an impulsive decision, and then consider whether a conversation is important and necessary — a live conversation, not a Facebook conversation,” Vogel said. 

Your decision doesn’t have to be all-or-nothing, “remain close friends” or “completely cut them off,” experts say. Instead, you may decide to mentally or privately take a step back from someone but remain on amicable terms.

“If it’s a person who you share friends with, you can still see each other at parties and big get-togethers, but do you need to be calling them? No, you don’t,” Ho said. “It doesn’t have to be this huge black-and-white approach, because I don’t think that that’s always feasible.”

Social media versus real life

The threshold for “unfriending” someone in real life compared to on social media is typically different, too. 

“If you’re feeling a lot of stress and anxiety every time you get on social media, and it’s a handful of people that are creating that and you don’t really have a relationship with them, I think it’s good for us to have boundaries,” Vogel said.

Ho added that “muting” is a great option if you don’t want to see someone’s posts without outright “unfriending” or “unfollowing” them, which they may see. 

“I definitely think the bar is lower for online consumption, because we know that just passive consumption of things can really affect your mindset,” Ho said. 

On the other hand, real-life friends who you have more meaningful relationships with may be well worth the extra effort it takes to navigate differences. 

“Our good friends can challenge us,” Vogel said. “There’s that argument of, ‘You’re in this echo chamber and you’re not talking to people who have different perspectives than you.’ I think good friends who care about us can come to the conversations with curiosity and be able to listen to your perspective, and then you’re curious about how they’ve come to their perspective. But that’s a much more civil conversation, typically, with a good friend where you value each other versus somebody that you really don’t interact with anymore.”



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

McDonald’s introduces the Chicken Big Mac

Avatar

Published

on


McDonald’s introduces the Chicken Big Mac – CBS News


Watch CBS News



McDonald’s adds the Chicken Big Mac to its menu for a limited time, offering a fresh take on the classic sandwich with chicken patties and no onions.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

Biden urging Congress to return from recess to approve hurricane disaster relief funds

Avatar

Published

on


Biden urging Congress to return from recess to approve hurricane disaster relief funds – CBS News


Watch CBS News



President Biden is calling on Congress to return early from its recess and speed up emergency funds for the victims of Hurricane Helene and Milton. CBS News senior White House and political correspondent Ed O’Keefe has more.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024 Breaking MN

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.