Star Tribune
Some Minnesota corporations quietly resume donations to election disputers
In the aftermath of the insurrection on the U.S. Capitol, many of Minnesota’s largest corporations publicly announced they were pausing campaign donations to all members of Congress, including those who joined Donald Trump’s push to block the certification of the 2020 election.
In the months and years that followed, most have quietly resumed donating to politicians who voted to overturn the results.
At least eight big companies with headquarters in Minnesota — including UnitedHealth Group, Target, U.S. Bancorp and Cargill — that initially suspended donations have since resumed contributions and have given more than $400,000 directly to the campaigns of members of Congress who disputed Joe Biden’s victory, according to a Star Tribune analysis of thousands of donations and Federal Election Commission (FEC) records.
“They’ve quietly picked it back up,” said Bruce Freed, president of the Center for Political Accountability, which advises corporations on responsible donations. “They’ve reverted to spending as usual, and they are engaging in spending for access.”
After the Jan. 6, 2021, attack, Minnesota-based Best Buy and General Mills immediately said they would stop giving money to election objectors, going further than most Minnesota companies that initially took a more neutral stance. Since then, General Mills appears to have continued with its pledge, while Best Buy has changed course and resumed such donations.
In addition, at least two other Minnesota companies — Medtronic and 3M — that paused donations three years ago have made changes to their political giving policies and haven’t given since then to any election objectors.
Medtronic, which is based in Ireland, but run from Fridley, said its PAC board reviewed and made changes to its guidelines in 2021.
“We enhanced our giving criteria to include that, in addition to demonstrating behavior consistent with Medtronic’s values, candidates must also demonstrate principles of American democracy,” the company wrote in a statement.
Most resumed giving
Days after the attack on the U.S. Capitol, Minnesota’s largest public company, Minnetonka-based UnitedHealth Group, announced it paused giving to all candidates immediately in order to review its donation strategy. By fall of that same year, it resumed political donations to Republicans who didn’t certify the last election.
Since then, the global health care conglomerate has donated at least $272,000 to 42 of the 147 Republican members of Congress who objected to certifying the election results. Companies make such contributions through their political action committees, or PACs.
“We participate in the political process to inform health care policy decisions that affect our company, and the people we are privileged to serve,” a UnitedHealth spokesman wrote in an emailed response. “Bipartisan political contributions are just one part of our efforts to engage in the policy process and our participation comes with the understanding we may not agree with recipients of political contributions on all issues.”
Richfield-based Best Buy went further than UnitedHealth, pledging to stop donating to members of Congress who didn’t vote to certify Biden’s win. But last year, the company’s PAC contributed at least $6,000 to three Republican lawmakers who tried to overturn the election results, according to FEC records.
Best Buy did not provide an explanation for why it restarted such donations.
In making these decisions, corporations weigh the interests of consumers, their own employees and shareholders, said Jiao Luo, an associate professor at the University of Minnesota’s Carlson School of Management.
Many initially felt pressure to make some sort of statement or action after Jan. 6, she said. But many worried they risked alienating Republicans if they did not resume contributions. The conflict for businesses reflects overall the political polarization in society, she added.
“It’s difficult for them to make decisions that appeal to stakeholders with very different preferences, so they’re a little bit caught in between,” Luo said.
A handful of Minnesota companies that initially paused donations, including Ecolab and Target, sat out the midterm election cycle but then resumed contributing to election objectors in 2023.
St. Paul-based Ecolab gave $2,000 last year to two lawmakers who did not vote to certify the election, including Minnesota Republican Rep. Michelle Fischbach. Since the attack, the company “reviewed and strengthened its assessment criteria before considering case-by-case contributions,” said Ecolab spokesman Nigel Glennie.
Minneapolis-based Target lists “respect for democratic election process” on its corporate website as one of the factors it weighs when making PAC contributions. “This means we will consider a candidate’s respect for the civic process and maintaining the integrity of our elections,” the website says.
Still, Target gave at least $16,500 in 2023 to six Republicans who objected to the results of the 2020 election. The retailer did not comment beyond pointing to its website.
In 2021, Minneapolis-based U.S. Bancorp said it would review its political giving policies to ensure that its involvement helps “advance, improve and do what is right for the country, our customers and our employees.” Its giving since then has included at least $53,500 to 10 election objectors. U.S. Bancorp declined to comment.
Ameriprise, which also has headquarters in Minneapolis, initially suspended donations as well but has since given at least $28,500 to 13 lawmakers who didn’t certify the election, including $1,000 to Fischbach. It declined to comment.
In the aftermath of Jan. 6, Wayzata-based Cargill, one of the world’s largest privately held companies, said in a statement that the “unconscionable attack on democracy stands in sharp contrast to our values as a nation and company” and it was “immediately and indefinitely” suspending all political contributions.
The company has since given at least $28,500 to 12 Republicans who didn’t certify the last presidential election. The company did not return a request for comment.
And after pausing donations, C.H. Robinson, the Eden Prairie-headquartered transportation and logistics company, has given at least $7,000 to three Republicans who tried to overturn the results. It did not provide a comment.
Public paying ‘much closer attention’
All of the companies gave directly to members through their PACS, which pour tens of millions of dollars into the battle to control Congress and the White House each election cycle.
Some corporate PACs take voluntary contributions from employees to spend on elections, and many dole out their givings to lawmakers on a bipartisan basis. After the 2022 election, Republicans narrowly took back control of the U.S. House. Most contributions flowed to their members in leadership positions or those who sit on powerful committees that debate policy on spending, taxes and business regulations.
But some companies feared associating their brand with individuals who bucked the nation’s system for certifying election results. Their vote against certifying the election took place just hours after a mob stormed the Capitol, sending lawmakers into hiding and temporarily pausing the proceedings.
Some companies have taken a stand. In addition to Medtronic, Maplewood-based 3M also changed its criteria for contributions in 2022. Its PAC now “prohibits contributions to candidates who overextend Congress’ role in the election process and continue to deny federal election results,” the company wrote in a statement.
Freed recommends all businesses have policies in place to guide their political giving and strategies to manage risk. Even a small contribution can connect a company to a person or idea that might be unpopular with some of its customers.
“Many companies are realizing they need to have a framework for their giving and spending because they run a real risk in terms of who they associate with,” he said. “The general populace is paying much closer attention to what companies are doing and how they are using their money.”
Rain and potentially heavy snow are on tap Thursday around the Twin Cities, just before families set out for Halloween trick-or-treating.
Temperatures were expected to drop throughout the day, creating conditions for flurries. A winter weather advisory is in effect from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. covering the Twin Cities metro area and parts of south-central Minnesota. Steady rain drenched the Twin Cities on Thursday, making for a soggy morning commute.
“As colder air begins to move in this morning, the rain will transition to heavy snow from west to east with snowfall rates of an inch per hour at times into early afternoon,” the National Weather Service in Chanhassen said in a weather advisory.
The Twin Cities and surrounding areas could get between 2 and 4 inches of snow, according to the weather service. The winter weather advisory is expected to affect Anoka, Chisago, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington and Le Sueur counties.
It’s unclear how much of the snow will actually stick, with warm surface temperatures likely leading to melting on contact in many areas.
“Exact totals will depend on snowfall rate, surface temperatures, and melting — which increases uncertainty with the snow forecast,” the weather service said in an early Thursday briefing.
“Thundersnow possible!” the weather service emphasized.
The good news for Halloween revelers is that the snow and rain are expected to wrap up in time for trick-or-treating, though temperatures will remain in the 30s with a sharp windchill.
An off-duty Washington County sheriff’s deputy caused a head-on crash while under the influence of alcohol and injured a couple in the other vehicle, officials said.
The crash occurred about 10:40 a.m. Sunday in Afton on Hwy. 95 at Scenic Lane, the Minnesota State Patrol said.
Campbell Johnston Blair, 58, of Hastings, was heading north in his Subaru Crosstrek, crossed into the opposite lane and collided with a southbound Ford Expedition, the patrol said.
Blair and the other vehicle’s occupants, 38-year-old Erik Robert Sward and 36-year-old Heather Lynn Sward, both of Lake Elmo, were taken to Regions Hospital with non-critical injuries, according to the patrol.
The patrol noted the alcohol use by Blair was involved in the crash.
Blair, who was driving a private vehicle at the time of the crash while off-duty, has been a deputy with the Sheriff’s Office since 2020 and is currently assigned to our Court Security Unit.
The Sheriff’s Office has been asked for reaction to the crash involving one of its deputies.
ST. CLOUD – On Tuesday, St. Cloud voters will be asked to make decisions on a new fire station and moving city elections to odd years, and — for those who live in Stearns County — how to fund a new county jail.
Here’s a look at the three referendum questions that are on St. Cloud-area ballots this year.
Ballot question: “Shall Stearns County be authorized to impose a sales tax & use tax of three-eighths of one percent to finance up to $325 million, plus associated bonding costs, for the construction of a justice center facility, consisting of law enforcement, judicial center and jail? The sales tax would be used solely to finance construction, upgrades and financing costs for the justice center and remain in effect for 30 years or until the project is paid for, whichever comes first. These services and facilities are mandated by the state of Minnesota to be provided by counties.”
Stearns County officials are planning to build a new $325 million justice center complex that includes a 270-bed jail, a judicial center with courtrooms, and a law enforcement center that houses the Sheriff’s Office. In the summer, Stearns County board members voted to move those facilities out of downtown and to a new location with more space. That site has yet to be determined.
The question before voters is how to fund that center.
County Administrator Mike Williams said a common misconception he’s heard at recent town halls is residents think voting “yes” gives permission to the county to build the facility, and if they vote “no,” the county won’t spend the money to build it.
“People [think they] are voting on the project — and they’re not. They’re voting on how we are going to fund it,” Williams said.
If voters approve the ballot question, the county will impose a sales tax to fund the project. If they vote it down, the county can instead pay for the project with property taxes.