Connect with us

Star Tribune

Cook County asks public to stay away from Lutsen Lodge during fire investigation

Avatar

Published

on


DULUTH — The Cook County Sheriff’s Office asked onlookers to keep away from Lutsen Lodge Friday, days after it was destroyed by fire and amid accusations the owner was connected to the blaze.

It had earlier in the afternoon declared the property a crime scene, but later clarified that it was still too early to say whether the fire was set intentionally or accidentally.

The Sheriff’s Office said deputies will patrol the area, which can’t be entered without permission as they work to preserve the fire scene for the State Fire Marshal’s investigation. Debris is unstable, a news release said.

Authorities in Cook County say the fire started about 12:30 a.m. Tuesday; the lodge, built in 1952 on a resort site that dated to the late 19th century, was quickly engulfed. By later that morning, all that remained standing were two chimneys. The lodge’s general manager said there were no guests checked in Monday night, and no one was injured in the fire.

The lodge was insured, owner Bryce Campbell said Wednesday, adding that he is “dreading the process” but intends to see that it will one day be rebuilt and reopened to the public. He denied he had anything to do with starting the fire.

The State Fire Marshal released a statement Wednesday noting that the lodge, which had a working sprinkler system, was last inspected in July, when seven violations were found, with four of them repaired. Two of the outstanding violations involved the sprinkler and fire alarm systems and the need to provide recent inspection reports. At this time, the statement continued, “it is too early in the investigation to determine if the three outstanding violations played a role in the fire.”

A federal Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms spokeswoman said a certified fire investigator with her agency has connected with state officials about the blaze.

Campbell, 39, bought the lodge in 2018 for $3.35 million, according to county records.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Star Tribune

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey rebuffs calls for police chief’s firing

Avatar

Published

on


Anti-police brutality activists interrupted a Minneapolis City Council meeting Thursday to call for Police Chief Brian O’Hara’s firing, saying his department failed a Black man who begged police for help for months, to no avail, before he was finally shot in the neck by his white neighbor.

John Sawchak, 54, is charged with shooting Davis Moturi, 34, even though three warrants had been issued for his arrest in connection with threats to Moturi and other neighbors.

Activists showed up at the council meeting and asked for time to talk about the case. Instead, the council recessed and activists took the podium and castigated the city for failing Black people, even as state and federal officials are forcing the police department into court-sanctioned monitoring because of past civil rights violations.

Nekima Levy Armstrong, founder of the Racial Justice Network, said O’Hara needs to be held accountable.

“This is not the first time instance where the community has raised concerns about his poor judgment, poor leadership, blaming the community and excuses. It’s completely unacceptable for him to get away with it,” she said. “How many Black people’s doors have they kicked in for less?”

On Thursday the council voted to request the city auditor review the city’s involvement in and response to the matters between Moturi and Sawchak.

Mayor Jacob Frey released a statement in response saying he supports the council’s call for an independent review of the case, but O’Hara “will continue to be the Minneapolis police chief.”

Protesters also questioned why the public hadn’t heard from Community Safety Commissioner Toddrick Barnette, who called a news conference within hours to say he’s not going to fire O’Hara and the city leadership supports him.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Star Tribune

Backyard chickens approved for more areas in Woodbury, but not typical city lot

Avatar

Published

on


A Girl Scout from Troop 58068 told the Woodbury City Council recently that they should allow backyard chickens in the city: They cheer people up, she said.

It turned out that chickens were on an upcoming agenda and, perhaps pushed a bit by the scout’s lobbying, the Woodbury City Council at their next meeting passed a new ordinance allowing for backyard hens.

The new ordinance went into effect on Oct. 23, the night of the council meeting, and will allow people who live on property zoned R-2, a “rural estate” district, to have backyard chickens. A typical city lot is zoned R-4 and those areas still cannot have chickens, the council said.

The city has received requests “here and there” for the last several years about backyard chickens, City Council Member Andrea Date said.

Backyard chickens come have home to roost — and never leave — in a host of other Minnesota cities that allow them, from Hopkins to Thief River Falls. It’s long been allowed in both St. Paul and Minneapolis, and new cities started approving backyard coops during the pandemic, when interest spiked.

In Woodbury, it wasn’t until the question was included on the city’s biannual survey that city staff knew how people felt. The survey found less support for chickens on a typical city lot — just 13% of respondents said they strongly approve of the idea while 43% percent strongly disapproved — but a majority approved of backyard chickens on lots of 1 acre or more.

The city’s rules until recently only allowed chickens on “rural estate” properties of five or more acres.

The new ordinance allows up to six hens, but no roosters, on property less than four acres that meets the zoning requirements. Larger properties can have an additional two chickens per acre above four acres. The ordinance also sets a height limit for chicken coops of 7 feet. No license or permit is required in Woodbury for backyard chickens.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Star Tribune

Anonymous donor pays overdue bill for Fergus Falls home where town’s first Black resident lived

Avatar

Published

on


A $10,000 overdue special assessment bill threatening tax forfeiture of a historic Fergus Falls home was paid off this week thanks to an anonymous donor.

Prince Albert Honeycutt lived at 612 Summit Avenue East, renamed Honeycutt Memorial Drive in 2021. Not only was Honeycutt the town’s first Black resident — settling there in 1872 from Tennessee — he was the state’s first Black professional baseball player, first Black firefighter and first Black mayoral candidate.

He was an early pioneer and prominent businessman who owned a barbershop in town. Missy Hermes, with the Otter Tail County Historical Society, said Honeycutt and his wife were likely the first Black people in Minnesota to testify in a capital murder trial of a man who was convicted and hanged in Fergus Falls.

“In other places, you would never have a Black person testifying against a white person, especially a woman, too, before women could vote even,” Hermes said. “Obviously he was respected enough.”

Nancy Ann and Prince Albert Honeycutt with their children inside the now-historic Honeycutt house in 1914. Photo from the collections of the Otter Tail County Historical Society.

When dozens of people from Kentucky moved to Fergus Falls in April 1898, known as “the first 85,” Honeycutt helped integrate them into the community.

He died in 1924 at age 71 and is buried in Oak Grove Cemetery in Fergus Falls.

Up until 2016, several owners lived in the Honeycutt home. But the city bought and sold the house to nonprofit Flowingbrook Ministry for $1 to take over the tax-exempt property and operate the ministry.

Ministry founder Lynette Higgins-Orr, who previously lived in Fergus Falls, moved to Florida several years ago and little activity has been going on in the historic home since. But she said there are plans to make it into a museum.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024 Breaking MN

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.