CBS News
Navy counters Houthi Red Sea attacks in its first major battle at sea of the 21st century
After Hamas launched its deadly terrorist attack in Israel this past October, and Israel began its unrelenting war in Gaza in response, President Biden warned Iran and its proxies in the Middle East to stay out of it. One of those groups decided instead that it was all in. That group is a Shia militia from Yemen, known as the Houthis. Yemen is the poorest country in the Middle East, but its 1,200 miles of coastline leads in and out of the Suez Canal, the primary route by sea between Europe and Asia, responsible for a trillion dollars a year in global trade. So, when the Houthis began to attack commercial ships, in solidarity with Hamas, President Biden faced a crisis in the Red Sea and sent the U.S. Navy into its first major fight of the 21st century.
Our report begins not on the water, but in the air, where from a U.S. Navy reconnaissance plane 500 feet above the Red Sea, we were the first journalists to see the types of commercial ships the Houthis have targeted and the U.S. warships sent to protect them…
Admiral Brad Cooper: We are not gonna let the Houthis hold this strait hostage.
Vice Admiral Brad Cooper is the U.S. military’s deputy commander in the Middle East. After Oct. 7, as the Navy’s top officer in the region, he ordered the fifth fleet into an area it typically sailed right through.
Norah O’Donnell: How many sailors are now in the Red Sea?
Admiral Brad Cooper: Yeah, we’ve got about 7,000– right now. So, it’s– it’s a large commitment.
60 Minutes
Norah O’Donnell: What makes the Red Sea one of the most important waterways in the world?
Admiral Brad Cooper: Fifteen percent of global trade flows exactly through the Red Sea. And so, keeping these vital waterways open is critical. It’s a core commitment the United States has from a strategic perspective, maintaining the free flow of commerce.
The Red Sea is about the size of California. In the north, the Suez Canal. In the south, the 20 mile-wide strait known in Arabic as the Bab el-Mandeb or in English as the Gate of Grief.
It was near there, three months ago, that a Japanese-chartered ship built to carry cars was hijacked by the Houthis, who posted this video.
Since then, according to the Pentagon, the Houthis have attacked at least 45 ships and the U.S. Navy has shot down more than 95 drones and missiles fired by the militia that controls one-third of Yemen, including the capital Sanaa.
As Houthi attacks intensified in December and January, the world’s largest container ship companies all made the decision to avoid the Suez and go around Africa’s Cape of Good Hope – adding as much as a month of travel time and a million dollars in fuel.
U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell told 60 Minutes two weeks ago the diversions pose a risk to the global economy, and in the near term…
Jerome Powell (during Feb. 1, 2024 interview): “That’s going to affect Europe much more than it’s going to affect us.”
Tesla and Volvo were both forced to suspend some European production last month due to supply chain disruptions.
There are still ships going through the Suez, mostly smaller, regional carriers that are willing to run the current risks of the Red Sea.
Norah O’Donnell: How much is that in terms of that traffic? Has it been reduced by half?
60 Minutes
Admiral Brad Cooper: It’s been reduced, uh, on any given day, sometimes 40%. But it’s clearly flowing, and I think in many respects it’s flowing because of the defensive umbrella that we put over the southern Red Sea, for sure.
The official name of that defensive umbrella is Operation Prosperity Guardian. It’s a coalition of more than 20 nations, that includes the United Kingdom.
… but most of the ships, aircraft and firepower …
… are coming from America.
Norah O’Donnell: When was the last time that the U.S. Navy operated at this pace for a couple months?
Admiral Brad Cooper: I think you’d have to go back to World War II where you have ships who are engaged in combat. When I say engaged in combat, where they’re getting shot at, we’re getting shot at, and we’re shooting back.
Initially the Houthis, backed by Iran, stated they would only shoot at ships linked to Israel, in support of the Palestinian people and to force a cease-fire in Gaza. Their ultimate political aims as well as their actual aim appears to be less precise – they have fired at ships tied to dozens of nations.
The Houthis’ official motto is: “God is great, death to America, death to Israel, a curse upon the Jews, victory to Islam.” While their slogan may not be new, their weapons and tactics are, according to Admiral Cooper.
Admiral Brad Cooper: The Houthis are the first entity in the history of the world to use anti-ship ballistic missiles ever, firing against shipping.
Norah O’Donnell: No one has ever used these?
Admiral Brad Cooper: No one has ever used an anti-ship ballistic missile, certainly against commercial shipping, much less against U.S. Navy Ships.
Admiral Cooper took us inside the Fifth Fleet’s command center at naval headquarters in Bahrain.
Norah O’Donnell: I think there’s a sense that the Houthis are sort of, like, a ragtag kind of terrorist group.
60 Minutes
Admiral Brad Cooper: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, yeah, yeah. That can be a sense. And it would be a false sense. And we– we would be unwise to consider that. Ten years of being supplied– by the Iranians, very sophisticated, advanced weapons. They have hit a few ships.
Norah O’Donnell: Of those targets, how many of them are directed at U.S. Naval assets?
Admiral Brad Cooper: The overwhelming majority over these last couple of months have been directed at– internationally flagged merchant ships. A small percentage of them are directly at U.S. Navy ships.
Norah O’Donnell: What kind of damage would one of those anti-ship ballistic missiles do on a commercial ship?
Admiral Brad Cooper: Well, let’s go right here. This is exactly what it looks like. The Houthis attacked it. And you can see in practical terms what the damage was.
The Houthis also have inexpensive Iranian-designed attack drones in their arsenal, like the 15-foot wide Samad, with a range of up to 1,100 miles. Some of their anti-ship ballistic missiles resemble the Iranian weapons seen here, and can hit targets up to about 300 miles away.
Admiral Brad Cooper: If there was an anti-ship ballistic missile launch, this ballistic missile travels at about Mach 5, about 3,000 miles an hour.
Norah O’Donnell: How much time is there between a Houthi launch and then it could reach a U.S. ship?
Admiral Brad Cooper: If it’s coming toward them, now just put yourself in the seat of the destroyer captain on that ship. He has about nine to 15 seconds to make a decision that they’re gonna shoot that down. It’s intense.
To speak to one of those destroyer captains deployed in the southern Red Sea, we took a five mile helicopter ride from the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower over to the USS Mason… where we met Commander Justin Smith. The destroyer is one of four American warships in the area that have shot down more than a dozen of the Houthis’ anti-ship ballistic missiles.
Norah O’Donnell: How quickly can you see those?
Commander Justin Smith: Anywhere from one to two minutes out. And providing me that decision space to give me the nine to 15 seconds as the captain of this ship on what my actions are gonna be.
Norah O’Donnell: You made it sound like that’s a lotta time, nine to 15 seconds. It doesn’t sound like much.
Commander Justin Smith: Seems very small and very short in duration– but my crew has that ready proficiency to be able to engage.
We learned that so far in this crisis, the Navy has fired about 100 of their standard surface-to-air missiles, that can cost as much as $4 million each. The decision to fire one at an incoming Houthi missile or kamikaze attack drone is made in the ship’s Combat Information Center – or CIC.
Commander Justin Smith: We can be attacked at any time and any place.
… that’s where Commander Smith showed us a video of the USS Mason doing just that.
Commander Justin Smith: You’ll see an intercept here followed by a quick explosion showing a successful engagement.
Norah O’Donnell: The weapons systems that you have on board here and specifically the standard missiles, those are expensive weapons. And you’re using them to shoot down $10,000 drones. Is that worth it?
Commander Justin Smith: I don’t think you can put a price tag on s– safety and the defense of our sailors on board.
Norah O’Donnell: You have to be right 100% of the time.
Commander Justin Smith: And they just have to get it right once.
A day before our visit to the USS Mason, about a hundred miles away, another U.S. destroyer needed its weapon of last resort, a defensive cannon called a CIWS, to shoot down a Houthi cruise missile that was a mile out and closing fast.
Most U.S. warships have one of these gun systems, seen here in exercises. The USS Dwight D. Eisenhower has two.
On that ship, with its 5,000 sailors and more than 75 aircraft, strike group commander Rear Adm. Marc Miguez told us the Houthis have proven to be resourceful adversaries.
Norah O’Donnell: There are the intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance drones that the Houthis are launching. How have you seen them used?
Rear Adm. Marc Miguez: When we first got to this– this– area, that– we would detect the drone, and then, all of a sudden, you know, ten minutes later or five minutes later, there was an attack, in other words, a ballistic missile bein’ launched– or a cruise missile bein’ launched. And we’ve deduced over time that they are obviously using these drones to perfect their targeting solution.
Since the war in Israel and Gaza began, other Iranian-backed militias have targeted U.S. forces in Jordan, Iraq and Syria, with at least 170 attacks, that injured 183 service members, and killed three.
Adm. Miguez told us so far the USS Eisenhower has only been focused on the Houthis in the Southern Red Sea. Since Jan. 11, its planes have been regularly striking their launch sites in Yemen, as have U.S. destroyers.
The U.S. also conducted a cyberattack on an Iranian spy ship that was gathering intelligence in and around the Red Sea.
But the Houthi attacks keep coming.
Norah O’Donnell: Could the Houthis do this without Iranian support?
60 Minutes
Admiral Brad Cooper: No. For a decade, the Iranians have been supplying the Houthis. They’ve been resupplying them. They’re resupplying them as we sit here right now, at sea. We know this is happening. They’re advising them, and they’re providing targeting information. This is crystal clear.
Norah O’Donnell: Are there members of Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guard Corps that are actually on the ground in Yemen providing intelligence and targeting?
Admiral Brad Cooper: The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is inside Yemen, and they are serving side by side– with the Houthis, advising them and providing targeting information.
Norah O’Donnell: And so what have we done to degrade that capability?
Admiral Brad Cooper: Yeah, that’s– that will obviously end up being a policy decision. Our role at this point is to simply be ready and continue to be aggressive in exercising our right to self-defense.
Norah O’Donnell: Do these offensive U.S. airstrikes against these Houthi targets in Yemen risk escalating this conflict?
Admiral Brad Cooper: Yeah, I don’t think so. We’re targeting those platforms that are targeting us.
Norah O’Donnell: If we were to look at the calendar, right, since October 7th, the surging of U.S. forces to the Red Sea. And yet, they keep firing back. They keep seeming to be opportunistic in their response. Is the U.S. Navy, the Fifth Fleet, are the actions having an effect?
Admiral Brad Cooper: It’s very clear that we are degrading their capability. And every single day they attempt to attack us, we’re eliminating and disrupting them in ways that are meaningful, and I do believe have an impact.
Norah O’Donnell: How long does this go on?
Admiral Brad Cooper: Well, I have a pretty clear– endgame in mind, and that is the restoration of the free flow of commerce and safe navigation in the southern Red Sea.
Produced by Keith Sharman and Roxanne Feitel. Associate producer, Eliza Costas. Broadcast associate, Callie Teitelbaum. Edited by Sean Kelly.
CBS News
Tajikistan nationals with alleged ISIS ties removed in immigration proceedings, U.S. officials say
When federal agents arrested eight Tajikistan nationals with alleged ties to the Islamic State terror group on immigration charges back in June, U.S. officials reasoned that coordinated raids in Los Angeles, New York and Philadelphia would prove the fastest way to disrupt a potential terrorist plot in its earliest stages. Four months later, after being detained in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities, three of the men have already been returned to Tajikistan and Russia, U.S. officials tell CBS News, following removals by immigration court judges.
Four more Tajik nationals – also held in ICE detention facilities – are awaiting removal flights to Central Asia, and U.S. officials anticipate they’ll be returned in the coming few weeks. Only one of the arrested men still awaits his legal proceeding, following a medical issue, though U.S. officials speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive proceedings indicated that he remains detained and is likely to face a similar outcome.
The men face no additional charges – including terrorism-related offenses – with the decision to immediately arrest and remove them through deportation proceedings, rather than orchestrate a hard-fought terrorism trial in Article III courts, born out of a pressing short-term concern about public safety.
Soon after the eight foreign nationals crossed into the United States, the FBI learned of the potential ties to the Islamic State, CBS News previously reported. The FBI identified early-stage terrorist plotting, triggering their immediate arrests, in part, through a wiretap after the individuals had already been vetted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, law enforcement sources confirmed to CBS News in June.
Several months later, their removals following immigration proceedings mark a departure from the post-9/11 intelligence-sharing architecture of the U.S. government.
Now facing a more diverse migrant population at the U.S.-Mexico border, a new effort is underway by the Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice and the Intelligence Community to normalize the direct sharing of classified information – including some marked top-secret – with U.S. immigration judges.
The more routine intelligence sharing with immigration judges is aimed at allowing U.S. immigration courts to more regularly incorporate derogatory information into their decisions. The endeavor has led to the creation of more safes and sensitive compartmented information facilities – also known as SCIFs – to help facilitate the sharing of classified materials. Once considered a last resort for the department, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas has sought to use immigration tools, in recent months, to mitigate and disrupt threat activity.
The immigration raids, back in June, underscore the spate of terrorism concerns from the U.S. government this year, as national security agencies point to a system now blinking red in the aftermath of the Oct. 7 attacks by Hamas on Israel, with emerging terrorism hot spots in Central Asia.
A joint intelligence bulletin released this month, and obtained by CBS News, warns that foreign terrorist organizations have exploited the attack nearly one year ago and its aftermath to try to recruit radicalized followers, creating media that compares the October 7 and 9/11 attacks and encouraging “lone attackers to use simple tactics like firearms, knives, Molotov cocktails, and vehicle ramming against Western targets in retaliation for deaths in Gaza.”
In May, ICE arrested an Uzbek man in Baltimore with alleged ISIS ties after he had been living inside the U.S. for more than two years, NBC News first reported.
In the past year, Tajik nationals have engaged in foiled terrorism plots in Russia, Iran and Turkey, as well as Europe, with several Tajik men arrested following March’s deadly attack on Crocus City Hall in Moscow that left at least 133 people dead and hundreds more injured.
The attack has been linked to ISIS-K, or the Islamic State Khorasan Province, an off-shoot of ISIS that emerged in 2015, founded by disillusioned members of Pakistani militant groups, including Taliban fighters. In August 2021, during the U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan, ISIS-K launched a suicide attack in Kabul, killing 13 U.S. service members and at least 170 Afghan civilians.
In a recent change to ICE policy, the agency now recurrently vets foreign nationals arriving from Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and other Central Asian countries, detaining them while they await removal proceedings or immigration hearings.
Only 0.007% of migrant arrivals are flagged by the FBI’s watchlist, and an even smaller number of those asylum seekers are ultimately removed. But with migrants arriving at the Southwest border from conflict zones in the Eastern Hemisphere, posing potential links to extremist or terrorist groups, the White House is now exploring ways to expedite the removal of asylum seekers viewed as a possible threat to the American public.
“Encounters with migrants from Eastern Hemisphere countries—such as China, India, Russia, and western African countries—in FY 2024 have decreased slightly from about 10 to 9 percent of overall encounters, but remain a higher proportion of encounters than before FY 2023,” according to the Homeland Threat Assessment, a public intelligence document released earlier this month.
A senior homeland security official told reporters in a briefing Wednesday, that the U.S. is engaged in an “ongoing effort to try to make sure that we can use every bit of available information that the U.S. government has classified and unclassified, and make sure that the best possible picture about a person seeking to enter the United States is available to frontline personnel who are encountering that person.”
Approximately 139 individuals flagged by the FBI’s terror watchlist have been encountered at the U.S.‑Mexico border through July of fiscal year 2024. That number decreased from 216 during the same timeframe in 2023. CBP encountered 283 watchlisted individuals at the U.S.-Canada border through July of fiscal year 2024, down from 375 encountered during the same timeframe in 2023.
“I think one of the features of the surge in migration over recent years is that our border personnel are encountering a much more diverse and global population of individuals trying to enter the United States or seeking to enter the United States,” a senior DHS official said. “So, at some point in the past, it might have been primarily a Western Hemisphere phenomenon. Now, our border personnel encounter individuals from around the world, from all parts of the world, to include conflict zones and other areas where individuals may have links or can support ties to extremist or terrorist organizations that we have long-standing concerns about.”
In April, FBI Director Christopher Wray warned that human smuggling operations at the southern border were trafficking in people with possible connections to terror groups.
“Looking back over my career in law enforcement, I’d be hard-pressed to think of a time when so many different threats to our public safety and national security were so elevated all at once, but that is the case as I sit here today,” Wray, told Congress in June, just days before most of the Tajik men were arrested.
The expedited return of three Tajiks to Central Asia required tremendous diplomatic communication, facilitated by the State Department, U.S. officials said.
Returns to Central Asia routinely encounter operational and diplomatic hurdles, though regular channels for removal do exist. According to agency data, in 2023, ICE deported only four migrants to Tajikistan.
Robert Legare and
contributed to this report.
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
Watch CBS News
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.