CBS News
Flash: Menopause is no longer stigmatized
On any given night in Las Vegas, the crowds show up for what has become one of the hottest shows in town. It’s “Menopause: The Musical” – 90 minutes of singing on a topic people used to just whisper about, from hot flashes to weight gain.
The show has been around for more than two decades, and when it first debuted, say producers Kathi and Alan Glist, people weren’t talking about menopause out loud. “It was called the ‘silent passage,'” said Kathi Glist, “because there was such a stigma, almost shame attached to it at that time.”
Symptoms like hot flashes and mood swings usually start in what’s called perimenopause, the months or years leading up to menopause itself. And if you didn’t know that, you’re not alone.
Dr. Sharon Malone is an OB-GYN, and an author who is trying to take the mystery out of menopause with a new book, “Grown Woman Talk: Your Guide to Getting and Staying Healthy” (Crown). She says most women do not know what to expect when it comes to menopause. “Most women have no idea when this whole perimenopause or menopausal transition starts,” she said.
And how long does it last? “That’s the $64,000 question,” Malone said. “Every woman is different, but the average is in the range of years, not months.”
There are new treatments for menopause symptoms. But the most common is hormone replacement therapy, or HRT, a cocktail of different types of estrogen to put back what the body isn’t making enough of. Starting in the 1940s, that estrogen mixture came in pill form, sold under the clinical-sounding name Premarin.
And you might not believe where the name comes from: “Pregnant mares’ urine,” said Malone. “Horses, you can image, put out a lot of urine. And as long as you keep the mares pregnant, you have an almost inexhaustible supply.”
And until 2002, it seemed that there was an inexhaustible supply of menopausal women lining up for hormone replacement therapy. Malone said, “Estrogen is not the only answer. But it is the most effective answer. For women who are symptomatic – and by that I mean women who have, you know, hot flashes, night sweats, sleeplessness, mood swings, and the list goes on and on – nothing treats those symptoms better than estrogen therapy. And that’s period, end of sentence.”
By the early 2000s, an estimated six million post-menopausal women were taking hormones. But then, HRT got a black eye. During the 1990s, a government study called the Women’s Health Initiative was investigating a link between estrogen and a decrease in heart disease. But the study’s directors found something else, and on July 9, 2002 they dropped a bomb:
Malone said, “They did not find the expected benefit in the decrease in the risk of cardiovascular disease, which was troubling in and of itself. But more importantly, there was a 26% increase in the risk of breast cancer. And when they reported out the increased risk in breast cancer, it was almost game, set, and match for the hormone therapy market.
“Women are more afraid of breast cancer than they are of cardiovascular disease, despite the fact that more women die of cardiovascular disease than breast cancer, at any age,” said Malone.
But the headlines didn’t tell the whole story. A closer look at that study showed that for most women the risk of breast cancer from hormone therapy is actually very low, and that for younger women HRT does lower the risk of cardiovascular disease.
Still, it seems most women only heard the bad news, and started throwing their hormone pills down the drain. “They’re like, ‘I’m not takin’ this, I don’t care how I feel, I’m not gonna do this, because you are increasing my risk of breast cancer,'” Malone said.
What’s more, the news also had a chilling effect on women’s health issues in general, said Jennifer Weiss-Wolf from the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law School. “Menopause became absolutely deprioritized,” she said. “Doctors stopped learning about it. Medical schools stopped teaching about it. And the government stopped funding federal research for it. So, we found ourselves in an information vacuum that persisted all the way up until this new chapter where people have started demanding change.”
Things are changing. There are several bills addressing menopause education and treatment working their way through Congress; and just last month, President Biden signed an executive order authorizing millions for women’s health research, including for menopause.
And at the grassroots level, women are making change by talking about “the change.” Recently in San Diego there was a gathering known as “Menopause Mondays” – a little wine, a few laughs, and a whole lot of information about menopause.
The cheerful emcee is Ellen Dolgen, who started holding these seminars 20 years ago after a bad experience with her own menopause. “My goal is to educate women,” she said. “My motto is, suffering and silence is out, and reaching out is in. I don’t want anyone to go through what I went through because I was completely uneducated. And it shouldn’t be, it’s not necessary.”
And there is an information gap. Some of the women “Sunday Morning” talked with were actually dealing with perimenopause, and just didn’t know it. One woman said, “Turns out after this function I realize that I do have symptoms. I’m just passing it off as life – like, I can’t sleep, I’ve just been busy, brain fog, I’m just juggling a lot of things.”
Dolgen has hosted these parties in more cities than she can count, and she says there’s no end in sight. To her, menopause is having a moment. “I think it’s kind of chic right now,” she said. “Like, I’m wearing my menopause right now and I think I’m pretty damn chic!”
And so the big news flash here might be ignorance about menopause is out, suffering is out, treatment is in.
Dr. Malone said. “I want women to understand that, you know, menopause is inevitable. If you have ovaries, you will go through menopause, whether you have symptoms or not. The message is that menopause is inevitable; suffering is not.”
Smith asked, “Do you think women still have this idea that we are supposed to suffer?”
“We have sort of incorporated the language of suffering into the entirety of women’s existence,” Malone said. “We have to get used to the fact that it’s okay to want to feel better.
“Why do we as women not have the ability to make decisions for ourselves without feeling guilty? Put yourself first to say that, ‘My quality of life is important.’ What’s wrong with that?”
READ AN EXCERPT: “Grown Woman Talk” by Sharon Malone, M.D.
For more info:
Story produced by John D’Amelio. Editor: Steven Tyler.
CBS News
Former Trump national security adviser says next couple months are “really critical” for Ukraine
Washington — Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster, a former national security adviser to Donald Trump, said Sunday that the upcoming months will be “really critical” in determining the “next phase” of the war in Ukraine as the president-elect is expected to work to force a negotiated settlement when he enters office.
McMaster, a CBS News contributor, said on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” that Russia and Ukraine are both incentivized to make “as many gains on the battlefield as they can before the new Trump administration comes in” as the two countries seek leverage in negotiations.
With an eye toward strengthening Ukraine’s standing before President-elect Donald Trump returns to office in the new year, the Biden administration agreed in recent days to provide anti-personnel land mines for use, while lifting restrictions on Ukraine’s use of U.S.-made longer range missiles to strike within Russian territory. The moves come as Ukraine marked more than 1,000 days since Russia’s invasion in February 2022.
Meanwhile, many of Trump’s key selection for top posts in his administration — Rep. Mike Waltz for national security adviser and Sens. Marco Rubio for secretary of state and JD Vance for Vice President — haven’t been supportive of providing continued assistance to Ukraine, or have advocated for a negotiated end to the war.
McMaster said the dynamic is “a real problem” and delivers a “psychological blow to the Ukrainians.”
“Ukrainians are struggling to generate the manpower that they need and to sustain their defensive efforts, and it’s important that they get the weapons they need and the training that they need, but also they have to have the confidence that they can prevail,” he said. “And any sort of messages that we might reduce our aid are quite damaging to them from a moral perspective.”
McMaster said he’s hopeful that Trump’s picks, and the president-elect himself, will “begin to see the quite obvious connections between the war in Ukraine and this axis of aggressors that are doing everything they can to tear down the existing international order.” He cited the North Korean soldiers fighting on European soil in the first major war in Europe since World War II, the efforts China is taking to “sustain Russia’s war-making machine,” and the drones and missiles Iran has provided as part of the broader picture.
“So I think what’s happened is so many people have taken such a myopic view of Ukraine, and they’ve misunderstood Putin’s intentions and how consequential the war is to our interests across the world,” McMaster said.
On Trump’s selections for top national security and defense posts, McMaster stressed the importance of the Senate’s advice and consent role in making sure “the best people are in those positions.”
McMaster outlined that based on his experience, Trump listens to advice and learns from those around him. And he argued that the nominees for director of national intelligence and defense secretary should be asked key questions like how they will “reconcile peace through strength,” and what they think “motivates, drives and constrains” Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Trump has tapped former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard to be director of national intelligence, who has been criticized for her views on Russia and other U.S. adversaries. McMaster said Sunday that Gabbard has a “fundamental misunderstanding” about what motivates Putin.
More broadly, McMaster said he “can’t understand” the Republicans who “tend to parrot Vladimir Putin’s talking points,” saying “they’ve got to disabuse themselves of this strange affection for Vladimir Putin.”
Meanwhile, when asked about Trump’s recent selection of Sebastian Gorka as senior director for counterterrorism and deputy assistant to the president, McMaster said he doesn’t think Gorka is a good person to advise the president-elect on national security. But he noted that “the president, others who are working with him, will probably determine that pretty quickly.”
CBS News
Sen. Van Hollen says Biden is “not fully complying with American law” on Israeli arms shipments
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
CBS News
Rep.-elect Sarah McBride says “I didn’t run” for Congrees “to talk about what bathroom I use”
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.