Connect with us

CBS News

Virginia school board to pay $575,000 to teacher fired for refusing to use trans student’s pronouns

Avatar

Published

on


 A Virginia school board has agreed to pay $575,000 in a settlement to a former high school teacher who was fired after he refused to use a transgender student’s pronouns, according to the advocacy group that filed the suit.

Conservative Christian legal advocacy group Alliance Defending Freedom announced the settlement Monday, saying the school board also cleared Peter Vlaming’s firing from his record. The former French teacher at West Point High School sued the school board and administrators at the school after he was fired in 2018. A judge dismissed the lawsuit before any evidence was reviewed, but the state Supreme Court reinstated it in December.

Principal Jonathan Hochman told the school board in 2018 that Vlaming allegedly refused to call a ninth-grade student by the male pronouns “he” and “him” because he considered it a “lie.” The student had transitioned and used male pronouns.

Vlaming said he would refer to the student by his new name but wouldn’t use pronouns, citing his devout Christian faith. 

He was fired the superintendent said because he refused to follow the school’s directive numerous times to use pronouns and created a “hostile environment.”

Vlaming alleged that the school violated his constitutional right to speak freely and exercise his religion. The school board argued that Vlaming violated the school’s anti-discrimination policy.

The Daily Press reported that West Point Public Schools Superintendent Larry Frazier confirmed the settlement and said in an email Monday that “we are pleased to be able to reach a resolution that will not have a negative impact on the students, staff or school community of West Point.”

The state Supreme Court’s seven justices agreed that two claims should move forward: Vlaming’s claim that his right to freely exercise his religion was violated under the Virginia Constitution and his breach of contract claim against the school board.

But a dissenting opinion from three justices said the majority’s opinion on his free-exercise-of-religion claim was overly broad and “establishes a sweeping super scrutiny standard with the potential to shield any person’s objection to practically any policy or law by claiming a religious justification for their failure to follow either.”

“I was wrongfully fired from my teaching job because my religious beliefs put me on a collision course with school administrators who mandated that teachers ascribe to only one perspective on gender identity – their preferred view,” Vlaming said in an ADF news release. “I loved teaching French and gracefully tried to accommodate every student in my class, but I couldn’t say something that directly violated my conscience.”

Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s policies on the treatment of transgender students, finalized last year, rolled back many accommodations for transgender students urged by the previous Democratic administration, including allowing teachers and students to refer to a transgender student by the name and pronouns associated with their sex assigned at birth.

Attorney General Jason Miyares, also a Republican, said in a nonbinding legal analysis that the policies were in line with federal and state nondiscrimination laws and school boards must follow their guidance. Lawsuits filed earlier this year have asked the courts to throw out the policies and rule that school districts are not required to follow them.

There have been lawsuits filed in other states on the use of transgender pronouns and rights in schools. In Florida, part of a 2023 law restricts pronouns and titles that educators can use in public schools, teachers filed a lawsuit in 2024 in an effort to overturn that restriction. In Colorado, parents are suing the Board of Education and others, saying their constitutional rights were violated after their daughter was encouraged to transition to a different gender without their knowledge or consent.

Lawmakers in North Dakota failed to override the governor’s veto in 2023 of a controversial bill to place restrictions on educators using transgender pronouns in schools. The bill would have prohibited the use of transgender pronouns in schools unless educators received permission from the student’s parents, in addition to a school administrator. 

contributed to this report.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

CBS News

Takeaways from Jack Smith’s unsealed brief in Trump election case

Avatar

Published

on


Takeaways from Jack Smith’s unsealed brief in Trump election case – CBS News


Watch CBS News



Judge Tanya Chutkan on Wednesday made public portions of a key filing in former President Donald Trump’s federal 2020 election interference case. Harry Litman, former deputy assistant attorney general, joins “America Decides” with analysis.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

Breaking down newly unsealed evidence in Trump 2020 election case

Avatar

Published

on


Breaking down newly unsealed evidence in Trump 2020 election case – CBS News


Watch CBS News



A federal judge unsealed new evidence Wednesday in former President Donald Trump’s 2020 election interference case. Trump has pleaded not guilty to the four charges in the case, including conspiracy to defraud the U.S. CBS News’ Jan Crawford, Robert Costa and Nancy Cordes have the latest.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

CBS News

Harris says she won’t ban fracking

Avatar

Published

on


Harris says she won’t ban fracking in an exclusive KDKA-TV interview


Harris says she won’t ban fracking in an exclusive KDKA-TV interview

02:55

PITTSBURGH (KDKA) — Vice President Kamala Harris said she won’t ban fracking natural gas, telling KDKA-TV that her position hasn’t changed since she joined the Biden ticket in 2020. 

As a senator back in 2019, Harris once said she would ban fracking, which is the method used to extract the natural gas the Pittsburgh region uses to heat homes and factories. 

The Trump campaign insists that is still Harris’ view, so in her first television interview with a Pittsburgh station since announcing her candidacy for president, KDKA-TV’s Jon Delano repeated one campaign ad and asked her directly. 

“The ad claims that if you are elected president you will ban fracking and cost Pennsylvania over 300,000 jobs. Have you changed your view on fracking, and if so, why?” Delano asked. 

“So let me start by saying that that ad as you described it is absolutely a mischaracterization which I think is intended to make people afraid,” Harris replied.

Harris said her view today is the same as in 2020 when she joined the Biden ticket. Biden said repeatedly in that campaign that he would not ban fracking, a position repeated by Harris. 

“I will not ban fracking. I did not as vice president. In fact, I cast the tie-breaking vote to open up more fracking leases,” Harris said. “And my perspective on this is grounded in a number of things, including that we don’t have to ban fracking to do the work that we can do to also invest in a clean energy economy.” 

And the vice president took direct aim at campaign ads claiming otherwise, calling them intentionally misleading. 

“I’m going to bring jobs back to rural communities. I’m going to make sure that we invest in those communities that have done the kind of work that you have in mind when you talk about Pittsburgh, when you talk about the greater aspect of Pennsylvania. And I’m going to keep doing that work,” she said. 

And while she obviously had a different view five years ago, the vice president is adamant she will not ban fracking.

“That’s where I stand, period. As president of the United States, I will not ban fracking,” she said. 

Despite her strong and clear words on the issue, it’s not likely to stop the Trump campaign from insisting her earlier views on fracking are her real ones, leaving it up to voters to decide who’s telling the truth. 



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024 Breaking MN

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.