Connect with us

Star Tribune

Will Donald Trump return to Minnesota before Election Day?

Avatar

Published

on


History also isn’t on Trump’s side. No Republican presidential candidate has won Minnesota since Richard Nixon in 1972.

Minnesota DFL chairman Ken Martin said Democrats “are going to take nothing for granted as we work to keep Minnesota blue.”

“With less than a month to go, Donald Trump is scheduled to spend more time rallying in California and New York than in Minnesota,” Martin said in a statement. “But the fact that Donald Trump is abandoning Minnesota is no excuse for us to let our foot off the gas.”

Republicans including Bergstrom insist the Trump campaign is still investing in Minnesota through on-the-ground organizing. The Republican Party said in late September it had trained 1,400 “Trump Force” volunteer captains at the campaign’s Minnesota field offices.

“They set up a very strong foundation here in Minnesota with a lot of ground forces and an action program,” Bergstrom said. “We’re seeing a great deal of success with that.”

Kelly Fenton, a former Minnesota GOP deputy chair and state legislator, said she also hasn’t heard anything about Trump coming back to the state before Election Day. But Fenton, who served as a Minnesota delegate to the Republican National Convention, didn’t rule out the possibility.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Star Tribune

What time and where rare comet ATLAS will be visible tonight in Minnesota

Avatar

Published

on


“It will still be pretty low, and it’ll set before the sky gets completely dark,” she said. “That’s the trade-off here. This weekend is when it’s going to be its brightest, but it’s also not in the sky when it’s dark,” Brummel said.

If you look to the west, you can probably see Venus, the really bright planet. Then scan to the right of Venus. If you have a pair of binoculars, just point them on Venus, and then slowly scan toward the right to see the comet, she said.

This comet is getting a lot of notice because it’s a rare comet that’s bright enough to see even through the light pollution of cities. A spot with a clear view of the western horizon, without trees or buildings in the way is good.

But the farther away from the city you get, with less light pollution, the better it will look.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Star Tribune

Minnesota Supreme Court rules that duty to retreat differs when someone else is under attack

Avatar

Published

on


The stepbrother told Gutierrez “calm down bro.” At which point, Gutierrez said, “I’m not your bro, bro,” and lunged at him. The stepbrother cracked him upside the head with his pool cue, swinging it “like a baseball bat.” Gutierrez stumbled, then continued attacking him. The stepbrother tripped over a pile of trash outside the garage and Gutierrez, a much larger man, climbed on top of him. He began strangling the stepbrother, smothering his face and punching him. Valdez testified that he knew Gutierrez was unarmed. His stepbrother was screaming in fear and begging Valdez, “Shoot him!”

Valdez came into the alley of the garage and shot Gutierrez once in the side.

Gutierrez screamed that he had been shot. Valdez told his brother to call 911 and Valdez called his mother. By the time paramedics arrived, Gutierrez had no pulse. A helicopter arrived to transport him but the flight crew declared him dead.

Valdez was charged in Renville County with second-degree intentional murder and second-degree unintentional murder. A jury found him guilty of unintentional murder.

At trial, the jury was instructed that Valdez, who was using a “defense-of-others” claim, had a “duty to retreat or avoid the danger if reasonably possible” before shooting Gutierrez.

Valdez appealed the verdict. The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed the conviction and sent it back for a new trial. The State of Minnesota appealed that decision and it was sent to the Minnesota Supreme Court.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Star Tribune

St. Paul voters to choose whether city taxes should pay for childcare

Avatar

Published

on


According to program details given to the City Council in September, 27% of St. Paul children live under the federal poverty level, $31,200 for a family of four. More than half live under 185% of the federal poverty level — a threshold used by the state to indicate the need for early learning scholarships. The committee formulating the St. Paul plan recommends covering the full cost of care for children under 185% of the poverty level.

In the program’s first year, the subsidies would likely help cover child care for 154 infants from some of St. Paul’s neediest families, according to estimates. By the 10th year, 650 infants, 1,169 toddlers and 1,096 preschoolers would be receiving child care subsidies, organizers said.

Noecker said 4,000-7,000 children up to age 5 will have been helped over the 10 years.

Fifty other cities across the country have voter-approved children’s funds, Noecker said, “And they’ve seen a lot of success.”

According to “Vote Yes” organizers, the average St. Paul home would pay an additional $16 in the first year, less than $2 extra per month. After the 10th year, when the program is fully funded, the average home would pay an extra $160 each year.

Records filed with Ramsey County show that, as of Sept. 10, the Vote Yes campaign has raised $65,380 and spent $26,880.20. The campaign had an account balance of $38,639.80.



Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024 Breaking MN

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.