In a tight presidential race in which Americans cite the state of the economy as the most important issue, one aspect of the country’s performance could prove decisive: How voters in battleground states currently perceive inflation.

Americans rank the economy and inflation as their top two issues in the November 5 election, according to CBS News and other polls. But perhaps even more important than current price levels is how voters in key states interpret their experience with inflation, according to Bernard Yaros, lead economist at Oxford Economics. 

All eyes on Pennsylvania

Yaros notes that voters’ views on inflation are particularly important in Pennsylvania, a state experts say could be a tipping point in the contest between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump. Pennsylvanians appear to be more sensitive to inflation than people in many other states, with Yaros’ research finding that every 1 percentage point increase in inflation before a presidential election is linked to tens of thousands of Pennsylvanians voting against the incumbent and for the challenger. 

That dynamic could be due to the state’s lower median annual household income of about $73,000, which is slightly below the U.S. median of $75,000. The Keystone State also tends to have an older population, at an average age of 41, compared with 39 years old for the U.S., Census data shows. Older, less affluent Americans 

“Lower-income people devote more of their income to essentials — they will react more negatively” to inflation shocks, Yaros told CBS MoneyWatch. Pennsylvania “also has a slightly older demographic, so people on fixed incomes are going to feel the bite from high inflation.”

With new CBS News polling showing a statistical dead heat between Harris and Trump in Pennsylvania, the path to victory in the state may boil down to whether voters experience inflation in one of two ways, Yaros said. 

Overall U.S. prices jumped 22% between January 2020 and September of this year, forcing consumers to shell out more for everything from groceries to car insurance. But in the past year, inflation has cooled to an annual rate of 2.4%, approaching the Federal Reserve’s target of 2%.

Given these trends, a key question that could tilt the balance in Pennsylvania, as well as in other battleground states, is whether local voters focus on the cumulative rise in prices since 2020 or instead take cheer from how inflation has cooled over the last year, Yaros said.

If voters fixate on how prices for many goods and services remain significantly higher than before the pandemic — what Yaros calls the “sticker-shock model” — Trump is forecast to win Pennsylvania by more than 90,000 votes, the economist’s analysis found. If, by contrast, voters zero in on the more recent descent in prices, Harris is projected to secure the state by 70,000 votes. 

Why inflation leaves scars

Some battleground states have experienced a higher rate of inflation since 2020 than the nation more broadly, especially those in Sun Belt states like Arizona. While those areas are now seeing a step-down in prices, prices in the Middle Atlantic states, which includes Pennsylvania as well as New Jersey and New York, rose 3.4% last month — a full percentage point higher than the national rate, government data shows.

Yaros’ model shows that voters in other battleground states like Arizona, Georgia and Wisconsin — states won by Biden in 2020 — could also swing in favor of Trump if voters there view inflation through the sticker-shock model. Meanwhile, Americans typically dislike high inflation more than other economic shocks, such as rising unemployment, he said.

“You have a rich history of literature that shows people disliking inflation much more than they dislike other negative macroeconomic outcomes, such as higher unemployment,” Yaros said, pointing to a 1997 paper from Nobel-prize winning economist Robert J. Shiller.

He added, “Unemployment affects only a subset of the economy, but when you have periods of high inflation, that affects everyone.”

It’s difficult to predict which outlook will prevail in the battleground states, Yaros said. But, he added, “The research we’ve done, which has shown how lower-income folks have seen their share of spending toward discretionary spending permanently reduced because of the inflation shock, that would argue in favor of people fixating on the high price levels, still being upset with the political status quo.”

Inflation: How do you view it?

The Consumer Price Index measures the change in prices over time of a typical basket of goods and services. But many Americans tend to conflate inflation with the actual prices they’re paying at the store. 

In other words, even though inflation has cooled, prices remain high; what’s more, they’ll stay high unless there’s a period of deflation, which typically only occurs when there’s a steep economic downturn. It also explains why more than 1 in 4 people polled by YouGov in August said they think the current inflation rate is over 10%, or more than quadruple the actual inflation rate.

“People who aren’t economists, when they think about inflation, are thinking about the price level,” Yaros said. “‘A gallon of milk is $3, not $2 like it used to be, and I’m upset about it’.”

Why the “misery index” could portend

Voters who focus on the recent cooler rate of inflation might be inclined to support Harris, in what Yaros calls his “misery-index model,” based on the misery index, an informal measure that looks at the sum of the nation’s unemployment rate and the annual inflation rate. 

Currently, the misery index stands at 6.5%, below its 9.1% average since 1947.

Historically, the misery index has accurately predicted the presidential outcome, with a high index number predicting that the incumbent party was set to lose. For instance, the misery index reached 15% in 2020, indicating that President Trump was vulnerable in that year’s race.

To be sure, plenty of other factors could sway voters this year, from immigration to abortion, Yaros acknowledged. And despite Americans’ glum outlook about the economy, consumers are still spending.

“We’ve seen such a disconnect between consumer sentiment measures and actual consumer spending, so people could be saying one thing and acting differently,” he said. “I don’t think anyone can say for sure what way this is going to break.”

Three Chinese astronauts including the country’s only woman spaceflight engineer entered the Tiangong space station Wednesday morning following an early morning launch into orbit.

The Shenzhou-19 mission took off with its trio of space explorers from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center in northwest China, state news agency Xinhua and state broadcaster CCTV reported.

Among the crew is Wang Haoze, 34, the spaceflight engineer, according to the China Manned Space Agency (CMSA). She is the third Chinese woman to take part in a crewed mission.

The crew met with the astronauts from the previous Shenzhou-18 mission, “starting a new round of in-orbit crew handover,” Xinhua said.

The new Tiangong team will carry out experiments with an eye toward the space program’s goal of placing astronauts on the Moon by 2030 and eventually constructing a lunar base.

The space agency deemed the launch a “complete success,” Xinhua said, noting that the spaceship separated from the rocket it was on and entered its designated orbit about 10 minutes after taking off.

Xinhua later said the spaceship had “made a fast, automated rendezvous and docking with the front port of the space station’s core module Tianhe.”

The team will return to Earth in late April or early May next year, CMSA Deputy Director Lin Xiqiang said at a press event ahead of the launch. The current crew is scheduled to return to Earth on November 4. They’ve been on the space station for six months.

China’s ambitious space goals

China has ramped up plans to achieve its “space dream” under President Xi Jinping.

It constructed a space station after being kept out of the International Space Station, largely due to U.S. concerns over the Chinese Communist Party’s military arm’s overall control over the space program, The Associated Press points out, adding that Beijing’s moon program is part of a growing rivalry with the U.S. and others, Japan and India among them.

China was the third nation to put humans in orbit and has landed robotic rovers on Mars and the moon.

Crewed by teams of three astronauts that are rotated every six months, the Tiangong space station is the program’s crown jewel.

Beijing says it’s on track to send a crewed mission to the Moon by 2030, where it intends to construct a base on the lunar surface.

Only the U.S. has landed a crewed spacecraft on the moon so far.  

One experiment the Shenzhou-19 crew’s time aboard Tiangong is scheduled to carry out involves “bricks” made from components imitating lunar soil, CCTV reported.

These items — to be delivered to Tiangong by the Tianzhou-8 cargo ship in November — will be tested to see how they fare in extreme radiation, gravity, temperature and other conditions.

Due to the high cost of transporting materials into space, Chinese scientists hope to be able to use lunar soil for the construction of the future base, CCTV reported.

The Shenzhou-19 mission is primarily about “accumulating additional experience,” Jonathan McDowell, an astronomer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, told Agence France-Presse.

While this particular crew’s six-month stint aboard Tiangong may not witness major breakthroughs or feats, it is still “very valuable to do,” said McDowell.

China has in recent decades injected billions of dollars into developing an advanced space program on par with those of the United States and Europe.

In 2019, China landed a probe on the far side of the moon, making it the first spacecraft ever to do so. In 2021, it landed a small robot on Mars.

Tiangong, whose core module launched in 2021, is planned to be in use for about 10 years.

NEW YORK — The New York Yankees are still alive in the World Series, thanks in large part to their young homegrown shortstop.

Facing the specter of an embarrassing sweep, the Yankees used a grand slam from Anthony Volpe and stellar work from their bullpen in an 11-4 victory over the Los Angeles Dodgers in Game 4 on Tuesday.

Volpe did it all on a night New York needed everything it could get from everyone, finishing 2 for 3 with the aforementioned slam, three runs scored, two stolen bases, and several sparking plays in the field.

Game 5 is set for Wednesday night in the Bronx.

With the home side down 2-1 in the bottom of the third, Yankee Stadium, which was largely silent during Game 3 on Monday, finally erupted. The Dodgers had opted for a bullpen game and Daniel Hudson, their second pitcher of the night, hit Aaron Judge with one out. Jazz Chisholm Jr. followed with a long single off the wall in right, sending Judge to third. Chisholm then stole second and Giancarlo Stanton and Anthony Rizzo walked, setting the stage for Volpe.

The native of nearby Watchung, New Jersey, laced the first pitch he saw from Hudson five rows deep in the left-field seats for a grand slam, sending the crowd into a frenzy.

After a slow start, Yankees starter Luis Gil looked like he might get through the fifth inning, but he made a mistake leading off the frame and never regained his form. The Dodgers’ Will Smith smacked an 0-2 fastball up in the zone into the seats in right, cutting the Yankees’ lead to 5-3. Gil then walked Tommy Edman, prompting New York manager Aaron Boone to go to left-hander Tim Hill.

Hill, however, was greeted by a single to center by Shohei Ohtani. Mookie Betts then hit into a fielder’s choice, sending Edman to third. The Yankees looked like they were out of the inning when Freddie Freeman hit a double-play grounder to second, but he beat the relay throw, scoring Edman.

Bottom of the Yankees’ order raked all night

Much maligned over the first three game of the Series, New York’s bottom four hitters accounted for five hits and drove in seven runs in Game 4.

In the sixth, Austin Wells, who was batting eighth in the order, belted a Landon Knack fastball into the second deck in right, putting New York back up by two.

Then in the eighth, the Yankees batted around and put the game away. Volpe, their seventh-place hitter, got things going by beating the throw home on ninth-place hitter Alex Verdugo’s grounder to second.

Leaving nothing to chance, Gleyber Torres followed with a three-run homer to right, Juan Soto doubled to right, and struggling Judge delivered an RBI single to left, perhaps an indication that the Yankees’ superstar may have more to say in the Series moving forward.

New York’s bullpen continued its strong bounce back from a disastrous showing in Game 1. The combination of Tim Hill, Clay Holmes, Mark Leiter Jr., Luke Weaver and Tim Mayza allowing pitched shutout ball and surrendered just one hit over the final five innings.

Freeman again got the Dodgers off to a quick start

Much like he did in Game 3, Freeman had the Bronx faithful fearing the worst right off the bat as he hit a two-run home run to right in the first inning.

The Yankees seemed poised to get both runs back in the bottom half, but Chisholm and Stanton failed to get the job done, the latter with runners on second and third with two out.

The Dodgers had a chance to extend their lead in the second when Gavin Lux led off with a double down the first base line, but Gil got Smith to pop out and Edman to line into a double play.

The Yankees got on the board during their turn at-bat in the second on Verdugo’s run-scoring groundout.