Connect with us

Star Tribune

Hagedorn campaign money transferred to charity led by his widow, Jennifer Carnahan




WASHINGTON — Almost a year after U.S. Rep. Jim Hagedorn died following a battle with kidney cancer, around $125,000 of his campaign’s remaining money was quietly given to a charity bearing the Republican’s name.

And while there are only scant mentions online of James L Hagedorn Cancer Charities, filings show the late lawmaker’s widow, Jennifer Carnahan, is the president of the organization.

Carnahan is the former chair of the Minnesota Republican Party who was forced out nearly two years ago amid scandal. She ran for her late husband’s congressional seat and finished third in a special GOP primary last year. She is also in a legal dispute with some of Hagedorn’s family members, who sued her over money they put toward the late congressman’s medical expenses.

Carnahan declined an interview request and did not answer a list of detailed questions. In an email, she wrote that “the charity is still in the formation phase, so there is not much to share (at this point) other than this charity was created to honor my husband’s memory and help others fighting cancer.”

In a Facebook post Friday, Carnahan blasted the Star Tribune for asking questions about the charity, accusing it of writing a “false and hateful article.”

Documents submitted to the Internal Revenue Service, which has recognized the organization as a 501c3 public charity, show Carnahan is listed as president and treasurer.

Jennifer Larson, who has been involved in Minnesota GOP politics, is its vice president, and Carnahan’s mother, Cindra Carnahan, is its secretary. All three are listed on the cancer charity’s board of directors in recent state filings reviewed by the Star Tribune.

Federal campaign committees are allowed to make donations to charities. However, a campaign guide from the Federal Election Commission states “using campaign funds for personal use is prohibited.”

The FEC guide notes that donations to a charity “are not considered personal use expenses as long as neither the candidate nor any member of the candidate’s family receives compensation from the charitable organization before it has expended the entire amount donated.”

Financial data included in the IRS documents shows that in 2023, the charity projected to bring in $237,000 in gifts, grants and contributions along with $126,000 in “unusual grants.” For its planned expenses, the charity listed $119,000 for fundraising, $115,000 in “contributions, gifts, grants, and similar amounts paid out,” and $67,000 in “compensation of officers, directors, and trustees.”

The charity projected $429,300 in revenue for 2024, with no money coming from unusual grants; an estimated $157,000 in fundraising expenses, and $160,000 in the “contributions, gifts, grants, and similar amounts paid out” category. The form lists an estimate of $72,000 for “compensation of officers, directors, and trustees” that year.

Carnahan would not say whether the charity had raised any money outside of the campaign donation, nor whether the organization would be using the campaign funds to pay salaries or compensation.

A conflict of interest policy signed by Carnahan, her mother and Larson states that “a voting member of the governing board who receives compensation, directly or indirectly, from the Organization for services is precluded from voting on matters pertaining to that member’s compensation.”

An outline submitted to the IRS about the charity’s planned activities states that 70% of its time would be spent on fundraising. Other planned activities include supporting people and families facing cancer and donating to “established cancer non-profits/charities.” The document states those plans will be initially funded with the money donated by the late congressman’s campaign.

“It seems to be critical because it’s the seed money for the charity,” said Lloyd Mayer, a professor at Notre Dame Law School who focuses on nonprofit and election law.

In her Friday Facebook post, Carnahan said she hopes to give financial support to families fighting cancer.

“Outside of treatment and regular doctor’s visits, there are so many other unexpected costs that arise — ranging from hotel night stays to purchasing oxygen and much more; or in our case also renting an apartment in Scottsdale during the height of the snowbird season and me dwindling my savings account to keep my husband alive to fight another day,” Carnahan wrote.

Heidi Hagedorn Katz, a sister of the late congressman who is not among the family members suing Carnahan, said the Hagedorn family was not told about the new charity.

“I can state with confidence that Jim’s family was not informed of the creation of the James L. Hagedorn Cancer Charities organization and has no involvement in it,” Hagedorn Katz said in a text message.

Hagedorn’s mother, stepfather and one of his sisters sued Carnahan last year around a week before polls closed in a special primary for the late congressman’s seat. In December, a Faribault County district judge ordered Carnahan to reimburse the family members for the more than $20,000 they spent on Hagedorn’s medical expenses. Carnahan has appealed.

At the end of September 2022, Hagedorn’s campaign still had around $140,000 in cash on hand left, federal records show. It then donated $126,684 to James L. Hagedorn Cancer Charities in October. The donation was refunded back to the campaign about a month later. Then in January, the campaign sent around $125,000 to the charity.

The treasurer for Hagedorn’s campaign did not respond to an email with questions about the decision.

Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Star Tribune

Striking workers shut down Minneapolis Park Board meeting with three-hour protest




Workers who are striking the Minneapolis Park Board for the first time in the agency’s 141-year history took the fight over their stalled contract negotiations to commissioners Wednesday night, demonstrating at their meeting for three hours straight until the board was forced to adjourn without getting anything done.

Commissioners Becky Alper and Tom Olsen started the meeting by attempting to amend the agenda with a resolution directing park managers to promptly settle with union workers. They asked the Park Board’s negotiating team to offer Local 363 a proposal with market adjustments that union leaders have committed to accepting verbally and in writing, but without the contract takeaways the union calls “poison pills” — such as provisions to reduce the number of stewards, double probation time for new hires and make automatic seniority raises discretionary.

“This unprecedented situation diverts our attention from our primary mission: preserving, protecting‚ maintaining, improving and enhancing parks,” said Alper. “Without this resolution we face as the Park Board a perilous path forward. It’s one with no end in sight. It’s one where we gradually crawl out of this hole while parks deteriorate, where workers’ families are impacted without paychecks and dissatisfaction grows among the public.”

Commissioners Alper, Olsen and Billy Menz supported amending the agenda to allow discussion of the resolution. However, Park Board President Meg Forney, Vice President Cathy Abene and Commissioners Steffanie Musich, Elizabeth Shaffer and Becka Thompson rejected the amendment (Commissioner Charles Rucker was absent).

Workers in the gallery shouted their dissatisfaction, asking why the commissioners refused to end the strike, now in its third week. The work stoppage has disrupted storm cleanup of the parks, canceled concerts at the Lake Harriet bandshell and caused maintenance jams across the system.

The only dissenter to respond was Thompson, who said she did not understand how the contract offer described in the Alper-Olsen resolution would affect the whole system. Menz, who voted to amend the agenda, added that his colleagues did not want to appear unsupportive of their negotiating team, which includes Superintendent Al Bangoura.

Kevin Pranis, Local 363′s marketing manager, said park officials were negotiating like they wanted to break the strike rather than settle it. He said it was only after seven months of stalled negotiations, and a 94% vote by Local 363 membership to authorize a strike, that the park negotiating team locked onto the “poison pill” takeaways.

“What’s happened now is that management has decided, after 140 years of Park Board history there’s never been a strike, that the goal … is now to make sure that for another 140 years no one will consider striking because they got hurt so badly in this strike,” Pranis told commissioners. “That no other union will ever consider going on strike.”

Every time commissioners attempted to move onto other business, park workers and allies from other unions formed a picket line around the board room, chanting “No contract, no peace!” and “What’s disgusting? Union busting!”

Individual workers spoke directly to commissioners, saying they had received discipline without due process and describing grievances they have pending with managers that likely have not risen to commissioners’ attention.

As the demonstration dragged on without comments from the dais, commissioners ate their dinners and had whispered conversations with each other and park lawyer Brian Rice, while the union ordered dinner from Portillo’s.

Commissioners finally walked out of the room around 8 p.m., three hours after the meeting began, without working through the agenda. Items not acted on included a resolution to transfer $10 million from neighborhood parks across the city to the redesign of North Commons Park, and extension of the lease for the Boys and Girls Club at Phelps Park.

Terryl Brumm, CEO of the Boys and Girls Club of the Twin Cities, left the meeting early, saying that while the Club’s lease of the Phelps Recreation Center now technically expires, she was confident the Park Board won’t evict them.

Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Star Tribune

Rochester blocks comments on city social media pages




ROCHESTER – Residents here with questions or concerns about city government will no longer be able to use official city social media pages to air their grievances.

On Wednesday, the city of Rochester began restricting social media users from leaving comments on posts from its official Facebook and Instagram pages, as well as pages for parks, police and other departments.

City Administrator Alison Zelms said the policy is in response to what she described as “counterproductive” activity on the city’s social media pages.

“Discontinuing the use of comments effectively reduces the potential for harmful content and negative interactions because it removes an unmoderated and monitored forum for those activities,” Zelms wrote in the announcement.

Comment sections on city posts were typically not monitored by departments, city officials said, due to “staffing challenges” and a prioritization of resources to other city needs. Rochester Public Schools also no longer allows public comments on its posts.

Mayor Kim Norton, who has spoken previously about the negative interactions she has had online, also disabled comments on her pages on Wednesday. Users will now only be able to react (by emoji) to posts or reshare a post with comments to their own personal pages. Norton said she remains available by phone or email.

“I believe this change will support our efforts to provide information, and also to create a better, safer digital environment for all,” Norton said in a statement.

Within hours of the announcement, threads on other sites began filling up with questions about the legality of the new city policy, with some users suggesting it amounted to censorship.

But Dr. Jane Kirtley, a professor of media ethics and law at the University of Minnesota, said the city is within its rights to discontinue public comments on its social media channels. Kirtley noted that while local governments cannot block comments based on one viewpoint or another, they are under no obligation to manage a public forum on social media.

“They can decide to discontinue the public forum if they choose,” Kirtley said. “If they do allow public comments, they can only impose reasonable restrictions on time, place, and manner. These restrictions must be viewpoint neutral.”

On social media threads — ones not managed by the city — there were a few users who defended the government’s decision to restrict comments, noting that city threads are often cesspools of comments from people trolling and harassing public officials.

But overwhelmingly, users were critical of the move. One commenter wrote that while “the change may simplify some aspects of the city’s social media management … eliminating open dialogue among constituents on the platforms most people use to connect is certainly not going to improve community engagement or help build trust in local government.”

Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Star Tribune

Judge blocks MPCA from restricting hours at St. Paul iron foundry accused of pollution




A judge has blocked the state from limiting operating hours and imposing other restrictions intended to reduce air pollution from a St. Paul iron foundry.

Earlier this year, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ordered Northern Iron, LLC, to limit its daily operations to control airborne lead and particulate matter, which can damage the lungs and circulatory system when inhaled.

But in a ruling issued July 11, Ramsey County District Judge Leonardo Castro partially granted Northern Iron’s request for an injunction, preventing the state from enforcing limits on how much metal the company could melt in a day and what hours it could operate. Northern Iron says the agency’s demands would make the foundry go out of business.

The judge left intact other provisions of MPCA’s order, and ordered the business and the agency to work together on a new air permit and installing new pollution control equipment. MPCA has said the business’ own modeling shows it is releasing pollutants at thousands of times the level allowed by law.

Alex Lawton, CEO of foundry owner Lawton Standard, told the Star Tribune that after the ruling, he “felt relief for the folks who were laid off that who wanted to come back to work.” The company announced shortly after MPCA’s order that it would have to cut 15% of its workforce, but is now operating with its full staffing of about 80 employees.

MPCA said in an email sent out shortly after the ruling that it “respectfully disagrees” with the decision.

“We stand ready to hold the company accountable should pollution emissions exceed [air quality] standards, to protect the health company employees and nearby residents,” agency spokesperson Andrea Cournoyer wrote in a statement.

Northern Iron opened at 867 N. Forest St. in St. Paul’s Payne-Phalen neighborhood in 1906. It molds made-to-order components that other companies use in finished products. Lawton Standard bought the business in 2022.

Sidney Pisano, vice chair of the Payne-Phalen Community Council, said the court decision has left the neighborhood feeling “disregarded.”

“It feels like we don’t matter, and I think that’s a sentiment a lot of East Siders have felt for a long time,” she said.

The situation has played out differently than the regulation of another urban iron casting company. Smith Foundry spurred complaints of bad smells and air pollution for years from neighbors in Minneapolis’ East Phillips neighborhood. The EPA took the lead on an investigation there, after a surprise inspection last year, and got the foundry to agree to shut down its furnace and casting operations in a settlement. Some in the area were frustrated it took action by EPA, not MPCA, to address the issues.

In the Northern Iron case, MPCA has led the enforcement, including a $41,500 fine imposed on the foundry last year for changing its pollution controls without reporting it to the state. Lawton said the Smith Foundry case was hanging over the regulation of his own business, and suggested it had encouraged regulators to take a stronger hand.

“I think Smith and certain other factors like that seemed to be omnipresent,” he said.

Since the fine last year, MPCA and the foundry have been discussing how to reduce its emissions. After one round of modelling showed that the particulate matter and lead released were thousands of times higher than federal rules allow, Northern Iron then came up with new calculations to show how the emissions would change if they altered their hours or installed new equipment.

The particulate pollution would still be higher than allowed, and the calculations for lead “seemingly defy the conservation of mass and likely cause an underestimate of lead emissions at some sources,” according to MPCA’s administrative order.

The company contends that it’s not polluting, because monitors stationed around the foundry show the air doesn’t exceed state limits on contaminants. It is still planning to install two air filters and make other improvements at the building, a project that will cost around $2 million, Lawton said.

But Cournoyer said that the foundry’s current permit requires it to use modeling to show it is meeting air quality standards.

The foundry and the state agency will next be in court on Aug. 22, when MPCA will argue to dismiss the case. Northern Iron said it plans to submit a new air permit application by August.

“I feel glad the MPCA is keeping the pressure on,” Pisano said.

Read the original article

Leave your vote

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2024 Breaking MN

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.